Jump to content

It's ballot box stuffing time already!


blueberryale77

Recommended Posts

http://mlb.mlb.com/index.jsp

It's right up there on the front page of MLB's web site. Time to start casting your 25 online ballots. No time like the present for Sawx fans to start stuffing the boxes for .177 hitting Big Papi and .239 hitting 'Tek and the Yanks fans to go to town for .153 hitting Robby Cano and .167 hitting Giambi... and you know they will too! I know this gets discussed every year but the stupidity of it never ceases to amaze me. All-Star balloting should take place in June only, not starting before the end of April!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://mlb.mlb.com/index.jsp

It's right up there on the front page of MLB's web site. Time to start casting your 25 online ballots. No time like the present for Sawx fans to start stuffing the boxes for .177 hitting Big Papi and .239 hitting 'Tek and the Yanks fans to go to town for .153 hitting Robby Cano and .167 hitting Giambi... and you know they will too! I know this gets discussed every year but the stupidity of it never ceases to amaze me. All-Star balloting should take place in June only, not starting before the end of April!

Would it even matter if they voted at the end of April. I just hope Markakis doesn't get snubbed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would it even matter if they voted at the end of April. I just hope Markakis doesn't get snubbed.

Markakis WILL get snubbed. He's only in his third MLB season, and he plays for the "once proud" Orioles. I'd be willing to bet 75% of the people outside Baltimore casting All Star ballots couldn't pick him out of a lineup...with help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Markakis or Sherrill will be our lone representative picked by Francona.

The OF will be Manny, Ichiro and Vlad. The IF will be A-Rod, Jeter, Pedroia and Youkilis with Victor Martinez catching. It's not even worth voting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tidbits about All Star roster selection and the ballot stuffing:

History of player selection methods

From 1935 through 1946, the manager of each All-Star squad selected the entire team.

Fans were given the opportunity to vote on the eight starting position players starting in 1947. In 1957, fans of the Cincinnati Reds stuffed the ballot box (see below), and elected a Red to every position except first base. Commissioner Ford Frick stepped in and removed two Reds from the lineup. As a response to this unfairness, fan voting was discontinued. Players, coaches, and managers were given the sole authority to elect starting position players, for the next dozen years.

Between the lack of fan input and over-exposure due to the double All-Star Games during 1959-1962, interest in the game was thought to be waning. As part of the rise of the MLB Promotion Corporation's attempts to modernize marketing of baseball, fan balloting for the starting eight was restored for the 1970 game.

Sometime in the 1960s, the distinction between left-fielder, center-fielder, and right-fielder was dropped, and it was provided that the top 3 vote-getters in the outfield category would start regardless of position. Prior to that the situation included remarks like "If you had Clemente, you couldn't have Aaron", and so on.

Rico Carty was the first player ever selected to an All-Star team as a write-in candidate by fans, in 1970, the first year that voting was given back to the fans. Upon getting elected, he was quoted as saying "Thanks to the fans for making this possible, and thanks to Gillette for making this all necessary."

Steve Garvey was the second player ever selected to an All-Star team as a write-in candidate by fans, in 1974. He was later the MVP of that game.

Until 2003, reserves and pitchers were chosen by the manager. Player voting was re-introduced in 2003 because the managers were criticized for picking players from their own team over more deserving players from other teams.

One continuing controversy of the player selection process is the rule that each team has to have at least one representative on its league's All-Star roster. Opponents of the rule contend that the purpose of the game is to spotlight Major League Baseball's best players, and that some superior players are left off the roster in favor of possibly less deserving players from weaker teams. This argument is strengthened by the greater urgency of winning the game, due to the rule that the winning league attains home field in the World Series. Supporters of the rule point out that this rule spreads interest in the game, and prevents large-market teams from totally dominating the squad and possibly resulting in, for example, an All-Star Game consisting solely of Yankees and Red Sox playing a team consisting solely of Dodgers and Cubs.

A number of compromises have been suggested in the media, such as limiting the number of representatives a particular team could have, requiring only that a certain percentage of teams be represented, or expanding the size of the All-Star rosters to mitigate the issue. However, Major League Baseball has not indicated that it is considering altering or eliminating the rule in any form.

Stuffing the ballot box

In 1957, fans of the Cincinnati Reds stuffed the ballot box and elected 7 Reds players to start in the All-Star Game. They were:

Johnny Temple, 2B

Roy McMillan, SS

Don Hoak, 3B

Ed Bailey, C

Frank Robinson, LF

Gus Bell, CF

Wally Post, RF

The only non-Red elected to start for the National League was St. Louis Cardinals' first baseman Stan Musial. While the Reds were known to be a great offensive team with many outstanding position players, most baseball observers agreed that they did not deserve seven starters in the All-Star Game. An investigation showed that over half of the ballots cast came from Cincinnati. The Cincinnati Enquirer had printed up pre-marked ballots and distributed them with the Sunday newspaper to make it easy for Reds fans to vote often. There were even stories of bars in Cincinnati not serving alcohol to customers until they filled out a ballot.

Commissioner Ford Frick decided to appoint Willie Mays of the New York Giants and Hank Aaron of the Milwaukee Braves to substitute for Reds players Gus Bell and Wally Post. In addition, Frick decided to strip the fans of their voting rights. Managers, players, and coaches picked the entire team until 1969, when the vote again returned to the fans.

To guard against further ballot stuffing, since 1969, each team has been given the same number of ballots to hand out. In 1998, that number was roughly 400,000 ballots. Since the dawn of the internet age, online voting has again raised fears of ballot stuffing. In one incident in 1999, Nomar Garciaparra gained over 14,000 votes thanks to an automated computer program.[1] Major League Baseball assures its fans that they have taken precautions to guard against this. Similarly, popular players who are injured often garner many votes despite their inability to play in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Markakis or Sherrill will be our lone representative picked by Francona.

The OF will be Manny, Ichiro and Vlad. The IF will be A-Rod, Jeter, Pedroia and Youkilis with Victor Martinez catching. It's not even worth voting...

There's no way Sherrill gets selected. ERA too high and most outside of Oriole land (and some inside) don't regard him as a true closer. I would think most likely Roberts gets in the same way he did last year, by virtue of finishing second in the player voting and the players and fans agreeing on the starter. Pedroia is leading in batting average and playing for the Red Sox so he's a shoo-in to start. Nobody else is lighting the world on fire but Brian has been as solid as anybody despite having a period of almost a week where he only got one hit and is respected by his peers so I think he'll once again get their votes while being nowhere near the top 5 in fan voting. Nick could be selected if that doesn't happen in the player voting (outfield player voting will be more complicated because the players will probably disagree with the fans on at least one starter) but I also suspect that by the time Francona has to make his decision Brian's numbers will be significantly better for a second baseman than Nick's are for an outfielder. Of course, if we keep playing over .500, Francona might find it in his heart to give us two all stars.

Edit: Actually I just checked and they already are. Brian (.820) leads AL 2B's in OPS by 28 points (over Pedroia at .792) and is 78 points ahead of the next competitor (Jose Lopez). He leads in both components of OPS too, by 27 points in slugging and his OBP at the moment is one point higher than Pedroia's and two points higher than Kinsler's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would it even matter if they voted at the end of April. I just hope Markakis doesn't get snubbed.

Either Markakis or Roberts will be our lone representative when the manager selects them, but I would not call Kakes getting snubbed. He is clearly going to be a superstar some day, but today, 2008, he is not one of the three best outfielders in the AL stats wise, nor is he a popular player outside of Baltimore. You have to have at least one or the other, and Markakis has neither. So there is no "snub" with him yet. Its just the simple fact that he's not there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either Markakis or Roberts will be our lone representative when the manager selects them, but I would not call Kakes getting snubbed. He is clearly going to be a superstar some day, but today, 2008, he is not one of the three best outfielders in the AL stats wise, nor is he a popular player outside of Baltimore. You have to have at least one or the other, and Markakis has neither. So there is no "snub" with him yet. Its just the simple fact that he's not there yet.

A voice of reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • The Diamondbacks absolutely destroy LHP (.857 OPS, tops in ML) and the Orioles are going to start back-to-back lefties in this series. Don't get me wrong, I would  not change the rotation now with things going well, but I'm going to be very impressed if they get another good start from Means after what Irvin just accomplished. The Orioles are in a much better spot with regard to starter diversity than they were in 2023 and I think that's a very good thing for OPACY.
    • I think the bar is pretty low.  Don’t be as stingy as John Angelos.   Nobody’s expecting him to be Steve Cohen.  
    • It's gracious of you to admit it's a matter of personal bias. In just his first of two seasons with the Orioles, Belle provided a lot more offense (37 homers, 117 RBIs, 143 OPS+)  than several of the players you did list combined in their entire Orioles careers, e.g. Clark + Carter + Thome--all of whom, moreover, were much further along "a downward trajectory from age." Belle's first season with the Orioles was basically equivalent to the popular and listed Nelson Cruz's single season (40 HR, 108 RBI, 137 OPS+). I also disagree that Angelos and the Orioles' front office should have known that Belle's days as a feared slugger were over: he had played 143, 158, 161, and 163 games leading into his age 32-years-old 1999 season with the O's. The HR totals during those seasons with the Indians and White Sox were 50, 48, 30, and 49. He played in 161 and 143 games with the Orioles in 1999 and 2000. The degenerative hip condition that ended his career was not diagnosed until the spring of 2021, a half year after his second season with the Orioles. The sight of Belle in spring training nonetheless trying his hardest to run down the first base line on essentially one leg left no doubt in my mind that, as he had expressed to the media, he was absolutely dedicated to honoring the generous contract Angelos had bestowed. He had to be ordered to give up trying to play.    
    • Then Who goes to the Pen?
    • Kimbrel was good, no doubt, But I'm with Irvin. Who could have possibly seen the last 4 starts coming? tonight was more of the same, Hope he keeps it up.
    • I think it was the 1997 team that had Mussina, Erickson, Key...   Could be this staff is the best since the 80s but we'll have to wait and see.  I'm not ready to say it's close to better than the dynasty staffs of the 60s through the early 80s.  Those teams didn't just have good individual years but many years strung together.  That's what the O's haven't had in so long and need to get back to.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...