Jump to content

May 8th @ Royals


mdterps4life25

Recommended Posts

Is that what's going on? Because Joe Angel is clueless.

Ramon's backswing momentum put him slightly in the way of the catcher. The catcher stepped forward more than he had to, really, and made contact with Ramon incidentally. Had their been an actual play at second, it would have been interference on a BS technicality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The catcher made contact with him, that's total BS.

If Ramon is in the batter's box, he can get in the way all he wants. If he's not in the box, he can't. Ramon had stepped towards (maybe on) the plate, he was out of the box. Doesn't matter what he meant to do, just matters what he did. So, the ump's call was the right one.

However, doesn't matter because Payton went back, so there was no play on the throw. Wonder if that's why he went back? If so, that's a tremendously brainy thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Ramon is in the batter's box, he can get in the way all he wants. If he's not in the box, he can't. Ramon had stepped towards (maybe on) the plate, he was out of the box. Doesn't matter what he meant to do, just matters what he did. So, the ump's call was the right one.

However, doesn't matter because Payton went back, so there was no play on the throw. Wonder if that's why he went back? If so, that's a tremendously brainy thing to do.

I think Payton went back because he was a dead duck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Ramon is in the batter's box, he can get in the way all he wants. If he's not in the box, he can't. Ramon had stepped towards (maybe on) the plate, he was out of the box. Doesn't matter what he meant to do, just matters what he did. So, the ump's call was the right one.

However, doesn't matter because Payton went back, so there was no play on the throw. Wonder if that's why he went back? If so, that's a tremendously brainy thing to do.

I think he was in the box, feet wise anyway. His body was leaned around from the momentum.

Maybe one foot was out of the box, maybe. I still think it would have been a technicality BS type thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, I'd still like an answer ont his:

So, I just started watching (lots of regular shows I wanted to watch tonight). Has Thorne said "Hey, that's Freddy Bynum" on pretty much every play he's made? Because, if so, not only is that awesome, I think he should do it for as long as Bynum is out there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think Norby is going to be a very good MLB offensive player. I’m ok trading him but not for 1/2 season rental types.
    • Yeah I think they need to staggar the lefties in the rotation order. R-R-L-R-L like that.
    • Trading Mayo Kjerstad and Povich for one guy to become a relief pitcher is nuts.
    • We don't need starting pitchers. We need Relief Pitchers. We don't need average Relief Pitchers, we need consistent high leverage/high K Relief Pitchers.
    • If you feel comfortable putting Aiken and Baker (or even Tate) in during an elimination series, that's your prerogative. But I do not. Too inconsistent, which is the same reason why Mike Baumann pitched himself off the active roster. when spot was needed for returning starters off the IL. Currently Coulombe is on IL so we can't even count on one of our best. Cano has regressed from last season. We've also witnessed last season how Webb broke down from over use and was ineffective in the playoff series against Texas. Perez goes in streaks of either really good or concernedly bad (he loses his command). Akin's problem is he leaves the ball over the heart of the plate and he doesn't have good enough stuff to get away with it. They're meatballs. We might get some good times from Baker now that he's up, but I would only expect a month or 2 at best from him before he returns to old habits. And Suarez is a starter who wants to be a starter. Who knows if he will go back to the bullpen? He'll have to go deeper into games if he wants to stay in the rotation, otherwise, I think he should be in the bullpen. But that's not what he is right now in this moment. He's a starter with a ERA in the 1s.
    • It's pretty hard to say definitively that the bolded is true.  It might be, but there's also the loss in ability you have to account for.  30 year olds are slower than 26 year olds too.  Maybe their game knowledge and practice have made it so they can overcome the meager loss in bat speed/athleticism over that time span.  But the picture is a bit muddy.   I also don't think the aging issue is limited to people in their mid-late 30s.  Bat speed peaks at like 24 or 25 based on the data we have right now on it, and after 31 starts falling off fairly fast.  Obviously this is population data and individuals are likely to see different curves.   But outside of the stars that have a lot of ability to lose, it's becoming pretty clear that once you hit your early 30s it's pretty hard to maintain your skills without all the "help" that is extensively tested for.   I think that even for early-30s players teams are much more willing to drop them over giving them expensive market-rate deals, especially since they can abuse young talent so readily.
    • After a really dumb day at work, this was an absolutely delightful read. Seeing a diamond expert and a can of corn detonate a yoked PBA pro was absolutely wonderful. I love this website. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...