Jump to content

Difficulty of Doing Radical Platooning in the O's Lineup


LA2

Recommended Posts

I was about to post the outrageous proposal that last night's Trumbo-less lineup** (although he was rested due to back spasms, not platooned) was our best against RHP. There's such a wide righty vs. lefty split in his record this year I assumed his weak stats were against RHP, but actually they're against lefties (.183/.232/.415, .647 OPS). A second anomaly is Bourn also has a severe reverse split (.353/.375/.456, .831 OPS vs. LHP) and his career stats show only a slight advantage vs. RHP. Davis's splits are significant, but he's making more money than anyone on the team and, along with Jones, Manny, Hardy, Schoop and Wieters, is part of the defensive foundation.

Otherwise, one could continue with last night's lineup vs. RHP, and go with the following against LHP: Bourne LF, but Pearce or Rickard if they come back fully functioning; Jones CF; Stubbs RF (very good career stats vs. LHP, decent defender); Manny 3B; Hardy SS; Schoop 2B; Davis 1B; Trumbo DH. (Obviously, that's going around the OF and then the infield and not the batting sequence.) That would also give us two killer pinchhitters in Alvarez and Kim, aside from the late-game platooning of Flaherty.

But it's not that simple.

**Although I'd consider moving Jones back to the MOO (proven reverse split) and leading off with Kim in order to move Davis further down the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I also went with Burnes because of his better durability. Since 2019 Snell has pitched more then 128 innings in a season one time (180 innings in 2023). While Burnes has pitched over 167 inning or more every season since becoming a full time starter in 2021. Burnes is also two years younger so in theory while a six year contract is riskier it would end at the same age as Snell on a four year deal. I'd be happy with either one, but my preference in Burnes.
    • Adding that I would go for Roki over either of them.
    • I'd go for Snell. He has true Cy Young stuff. Burnes is really good but his K rate keeps dropping and the years scare me. The box score for his playoff start was solid but he actually gave up a lot of hard contact. I just don't trust him enough to commit all those years and dollars.
    • I go Burnes because to me the higher floor is very important with this sort of deal. I feel like Snell's skillset is more on a razor's edge-- if you didn't like how Burnes pitched in August, Snell is almost certainly more prone to stretches of poor performance like that. Even if he is more dominant at other times to balance it out. Plus, the extra length of Burnes' deal is offset a bit by being 2 years younger. 
    • Snell is injury prone and Burnes is a tough workhorse.
    • Didn't see the video? The ball went maybe 15 feet before it bounced, it was rolling by the dugout.  It was nothing and the Dodgers look soft. Was he supposed to let the discarded ball stay on the field?
    • Rojas pulled from the bases in the 3rd inning after he couldn't manage 2nd to home on a Mookie single (and Ohtani couldn't 1st to 3rd behind him) as the Dodgers try to dig out of 6-1.    Rojas' limited mobility hurt the Dodgers defense on a Bogaerts ground ball where Merrill was too quick going first to second, and Rojas ended up getting no outs on a routine ground ball. Manny with a cagey zigzag baserunning move during the Padres 6-run inning off Buehler, getting into Freeman's throwing lane to put Buehler into the jam. Teoscar grand slam brings it back to 6-5 in the 3rd inning...get your popcorn ready.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...