Jump to content

The Matt Wieters Appreciation Thread


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I remember the negotiations to sign Wieters doing down the deadline and the ownership stepping up with a monster bonus - as it should have.  Wieters has a tremendous asset to the organization and a class act from the moment he signed. 

Expectations were created by MW's agent with the signing bonus (but that was market value) and by the great seasons in the minors.  It would have been nice if Matt were a true middle of the order hitter, but his best was plenty good enough.  The videos of him gunning down baserunners are among my favorite Orioles vids.

It would have been interesting if MW had been dealt after the 2012 (or 2013 - can't remember) season for two or three blue chip prospects as some of us advocated - and he really has not been a difference maker since.  Matt spent the next (or last) four years accumulating about as much WAR in those years in total as the average of 2011/12.  Buck was enamored with MW and so we've kept him until he the point where he will provide no return when he leaves - something I'm not very comfortable with - which, of course, has nothing to do with a fond farewell to MW for wearing the Os uniform and providing us with quality memories.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I adore Matt Wieters. From the time he arrived to the time he got hurt, nobody caught more innings than Matt. That's tough to begin with and even more so when consider Baltimore is rated as the toughest town climate-wise in MLB. He hung in there and ran the game how Buck dictated, which was a quick paced game to keep the defense on it's toes so they could provide their best efforts. I know he doesn't frame well but we'll soon see more stats that quantify gamesmanship and I'm confident Matt will score well.  Good night sweet prince.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, hoosiers said:

I remember the negotiations to sign Wieters doing down the deadline and the ownership stepping up with a monster bonus - as it should have.  Wieters has a tremendous asset to the organization and a class act from the moment he signed. 

Expectations were created by MW's agent with the signing bonus (but that was market value) and by the great seasons in the minors.  It would have been nice if Matt were a true middle of the order hitter, but his best was plenty good enough.  The videos of him gunning down baserunners are among my favorite Orioles vids.

It would have been interesting if MW had been dealt after the 2012 (or 2013 - can't remember) season for two or three blue chip prospects as some of us advocated - and he really has not been a difference maker since.  Matt spent the next (or last) four years accumulating about as much WAR in those years in total as the average of 2011/12.  Buck was enamored with MW and so we've kept him until he the point where he will provide no return when he leaves - something I'm not very comfortable with - which, of course, has nothing to do with a fond farewell to MW for wearing the Os uniform and providing us with quality memories.

 

I enjoyed Matt at his best, and after the injury it is easy to say he should have been dealt. By a team that had just returned to winning, playoff attending ways with him a large part in 2012. I cannot say that I will not miss him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely will miss him. He was an easy guy to root for. Oriole HOF worthy? Probably not, but he was a huge part of the turn around once Buck got here. I'll still never understand why his offense was never elite, like he showed in the minors, but that is a discussion for another time.

Good luck wherever you go Matt! I'm hoping that it's Atlanta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked Matt, I got to meet him at the last fanfest. He never lived up to the hype but he was still a very good catcher. Unfortunately he got too expensive for us. I wish for a bounce back season for him wherever he goes an hopefully he is able to transition to 1b or somewhere else to extend his career.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, canonfaz said:

Definitely will miss him. He was an easy guy to root for. Oriole HOF worthy? Probably not, but he was a huge part of the turn around once Buck got here. I'll still never understand why his offense was never elite, like he showed in the minors, but that is a discussion for another time.

Good luck wherever you go Matt! I'm hoping that it's Atlanta.

I think you need to check out who is already in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltimore_Orioles_Hall_of_Fame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

Maybe this is premature pending a formal announcement that Castillo has been signed, but let me take a moment to say a few things about Matt Wieters.

While Matt never met the sky-high offensive expectations that many of us had after his insane year at Frederick and Bowie in 2008, he provided a lot of great moments.    I loved the way he carried himself on the field, and the look he always had on his face after gunning down a runner or blocking a runner at the plate.    It was a look that basically said, "how dare you!"     As he grew into veteran status, he was very well respected by his teammates, especially the pitchers.   And we all know Buck adored the guy; that counts for a lot in my book.

We thought we'd be saying goodbye to Matt last offseason, but he surprised a lot of people (not everyone) and took the QO.   There was a lot of unhappiness about it at the time, but looking back, we weren't a playoff team in 2016 without Matt.   From his game winning hit on opening day, to his game winning homer against the Angels in May, to his game-tying homer against the Blue Jays in the second-to-last series of the year, to his two homers in our playoff-clinching win on the final day of the regular season, Matt provided a lot of really special moments in 2016.

We all mostly agree that it's time to move on, but I enjoyed Matt's 9 years playing in our organization (8 as a major leaguer) and I hope he has several good years left in him.   The team that signs him will be getting a class act.

This.  Can't say it any better.  Best wishes to Matt for the remainder of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, fansince1988 said:

Matt represented the first sign of hope for the fanbase during 14 years of losing.

I was fortune enough to see him play at Frederick, and I was in the stands with my father at Camden Yards when he hit his first career home run against the Mets.

I always dreamed that Matt would hit a towering homerun in game 7 of the World Series at Camden Yards. 

Thank you MW for your effort. You gave us hope.

 

I think that's a fair assessment. After 1st round picks like Rowell, Olson, Townsend, Snyder and Beato, Wieters was the first guy since Markakis that the fans could get excited about especially after his first full minor league season when he exceeded everyone expectations.

Wieters was a good player for us overall. He may have been a victim of his own early success which skyrocketed expectations, but for years it was fun to know he had that cannon back there and he certainly had his times with the bat as well. 

He'll go down as one of the best catcher's in Orioles history if not the best overall.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

 

He'll go down as one of the best catcher's in Orioles history if not the best overall.

 

By rWAR:

Hoiles 23.4 (10 seasons)

Dempsey 21.3 (12 seasons)

Wieters 16.3 (8 seasons)

Nobody else over 10 rWAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Gunnar is the only one you worry about. I would still sign Holliday as well but I think Gunnar is the bigger fish to fry. I no longer would consider an extension for Adley. I would wait on anyone else.
    • Something that doesn't show up on the stat sheet is something like being able to hit behind the runner to advance him.   The O's have been successful in building an analytics offense.   Focus on hitting homeruns, develop a swing to achieve optimum launch angle and exit velocity to hit the ball over the fence.  Result is they have a team of beer league software players and not baseball players and struggle to score when not hitting homeruns.   Analytically, if you review their offensive rankings for the season, it says, nothing wrong with the offense, at least from a macro review, but we all know that this offense has issues.   Runs - 4th Home runs - 3rd AVG - 7th OBP - 11th SLG - 3rd OPS - 4th  K's - 18th (this was interesting to see considering how much they seem to strikeout) All of the above looks good, nothing to fix. The O's had 6 sacrifice hits for the season, ranking 30th.  Interestingly, Arizona who led the league in runs scored also led the league in sacrifice hits with 34.   The O's do not need to necessarily to focus on small ball, but they do need to be able to add that skillset to their offensive arsenal.  
    • Sounds like Buck. Anything to get a slight advantage. It’s something this team sorely misses. 
    • Detroit has been so much fun to watch. They have Skubal and literally 11 completely interchangeable pitchers who Hinch uses at any time and in any situation. They all can start games, throw in middle relief, and close. Every Tigers pitcher has to be ready to come in at any time because nobody other than Skubal actually has a defined role, which can certainly help keep them focused.  That guy Holton who started Game 1 in Cleveland closed Game 3 yesterday.  Of course he did! And Hinch seems to have complete faith in everybody, which I guess works since they all seem to have rubber arms and never get tired. It must be so annoying as an opposing manager to try and game plan against them or to be a hitter and have absolutely no idea who you are going to be facing until you actually walk up to the plate.  Not sure how long this "gimmick" will last, but it has been really enjoyable.
    • So if Westburg ends up being a very good but not MVP level player you aren't interesting in extending him at a team friendly rate? I disagree with your strategy. If you can lock up even a young 3 win player at a team friendly rate I say do it.
    • The most obvious player to extend is Gunnar, his agent is Boras, which means most likely, he will not be interested in an extension.  All others, you have to wait and see.  Adley after that horrible second half, you really need to see if he bounces back.  Westburg, need a full season before locking him up, plus he would probably want a season to post big numbers.  Cowser, wait and see if he learns the strike zone before extending.  
    • I agree with you on Gunnar. I'd wait on Westburg until he puts up a Gunnar like season, and spend money on Burnes this offseason. Oh and do something temporary to bring the RF wall in 10-15 feet
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...