Jump to content

Maybe It's Just Me, But Does It Seem Like We Always Let The Yankees Off The Hook?


ORIOLE33

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I guess they let us off the hook the first two games when we came back. I understand what you are saying, but it's baseball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, and sometimes it rains.

Sometimes Zach Britton is unavailable, and sometimes you wait too long to use him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ORIOLE33 said:

I could be wrong, but damn, it seems like we've had this team on the ropes quite a few times to only let them steal the last game of a series. 

I know it's early, but I really wanted this sweep.

I just happy the O's won the series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ORIOLE33 said:

 

I could be wrong, but damn, it seems like we've had this team on the ropes quite a few times to only let them steal the last game of a series. 

I know it's early, but I really wanted this sweep.

 

o

 

Aside from the fact that I completely agree with Tony-OH's post, this is a reminder of the fates of the Orioles and the Yankees from the 2016 season.

If anybody should be feeling like it's Bill Murray's Groundhog Day, it's Yankee fans, nor Orioles fans.

 

 

1) ) The Orioles beat the Yankees on the final game of the 2016 season.

2) ) The Orioles won the final series of the 2016 season against the Yankees, 2 games to 1.

3) ) The Orioles won the overall 2016 season series against the Yankees, 10 games to 9.

4) ) The Orioles knocked the Yankees out of the 2016 post-season with a 4-0 shutout of the Blue Jays on September 29th.

5) ll The Yankees DID NOT knock the Orioles out of the post-season in the final series of the 2016 season, when they had a chance to.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

 

It's just you.

 

 

6 minutes ago, ORIOLE33 said:

 

Lol ... I was expecting that. Happens on every site.

 

o

 

What happens on every site ???

A person starts a "Woe is Me/Us" thread that isn't based in reality, and then is reminded why by several other posters ???

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still remember 2007, when we won each of the first four series against the Yankees to take an 8-4 lead in the season series, only to lose 5 of the final 6 and end up with a 9-9 series tie.    I wanted to win that season series so badly!     We've now won the season series with NY three years in a row, but before that it had been some unconscionable number of years since we'd beaten them for the year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the feeling, but we have come back to win a few games already this year, including the Yankees series. It probably felt to their fines like the other teams were letting us off the hook. These guys are professional baseball players, and they are going to keep coming at us for 9 innings every game for 162 games. They are not going to just roll over because we got the first two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I guess they let us off the hook the first two games when we came back. I understand what you are saying, but it's baseball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, and sometimes it rains.

Your right Tony...We're all gonna have to learn our clichés. You're gonna have to study them, you're gonna have to know them. They're your friends. Write this down: "We gotta play it one day at a time." ;

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Pineda had a perfect game through 6 and just lost it in the 7th inning on precisely the first pitch I saw after tuning into the game.  This is the 2nd straight "perfect game alert" that I tuned into at exactly the pitch that spoiled it, the previous being the 27th batter (with 2 strikes) being hit by a pitch from Max Scherzer a couple years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its just he Yankees.  Its the way Buck manages and I am not saying he wrong to do what he does. 

1) Buck protects his guys in the pen by very rarely letting them pitch in three straight games.  That can mean that its harder to sweep without the best the O's have.

2) Sunday's which are often day games after night games see Buck playing the bench player more than the rest of the week.  That can also make is hard to sweep.

But Buck is protecting his players for the long haul by the way he manages. And he has proven to be right more times than not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...