Jump to content

Six games into the season


spiritof66

Recommended Posts

Sometimes baseball is just too damn predictable. With about 4 percent of the season in the books, the Orioles are rolling along pretty much as we'd all expected: solid starting pitching, shaky relief work, not much power (tied for 24th in MLB in HRS, 26th in SLG), scratching for runs as a result, putting the bat on the ball (tied for second fewest batting Ks), Seth Smith, Castillo and Davis leading the team in BA, and erratic defense with a porous and unreliable infield. All adding up to .667 baseball (a 108-win clip) and first place in the division.   :confused:

Strange game, isn't it? 

(Before someone else mentions it, we are last in walks drawn.)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Sometimes baseball is just too damn predictable. With about 4 percent of the season in the books, the Orioles are rolling along pretty much as we'd all expected: solid starting pitching, shaky relief work, not much power (tied for 24th in MLB in HRS, 26th in SLG), scratching for runs as a result, putting the bat on the ball (tied for second fewest batting Ks), Seth Smith, Castillo and Davis leading the team in BA, and erratic defense with a porous and unreliable infield. All adding up to .667 baseball (a 108-win clip) and first place in the division.   :confused:

Strange game, isn't it? 

(Before someone else mentions it, we are last in walks drawn.)

At least something is going according to expectations!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Sometimes baseball is just too damn predictable. With about 4 percent of the season in the books, the Orioles are rolling along pretty much as we'd all expected: solid starting pitching, shaky relief work, not much power (tied for 24th in MLB in HRS, 26th in SLG), scratching for runs as a result, putting the bat on the ball (tied for second fewest batting Ks), Seth Smith, Castillo and Davis leading the team in BA, and erratic defense with a porous and unreliable infield. All adding up to .667 baseball (a 108-win clip) and first place in the division.   :confused:

Strange game, isn't it? 

(Before someone else mentions it, we are last in walks drawn.)

 

It's way too early though. They'll be getting better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Gentry stinks. I hope he doesn't become one of "Buck's Guys" and stick around the entire season, based on a good spring. 

Get rid of him and bring up Mullins.

The team will not carry a small pen for the rest of the season.

Once they need that 5th starter on a regular basis, somebody is gone, and Gentry just well might be that body.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Gentry stinks. I hope he doesn't become one of "Buck's Guys" and stick around the entire season, based on a good spring. 

Get rid of him and bring up Mullins.

This may be the most reactionary thing I've ever read on this site.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

This may be the most reactionary thing I've ever read on this site.   

Oh, come on.  I'm sure we've had threads advocating for the release of players before the Orioles even signed them.  There were folks saying the Orioles would never have any winning seasons during the current decade in years where they won playoff series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

The team will not carry a small pen for the rest of the season.

Once they need that 5th starter on a regular basis, somebody is gone, and Gentry just well might be that body.

 

Yes, he might be the one who's Bourne-out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/12/2017 at 1:24 PM, Frobby said:

This may be the most reactionary thing I've ever read on this site.   

I would normally agree with you...SSS, yada yada yada.

But Gentry looks B.A.D. thus far and has not been a positive WAR player since 2014. I'll concede that it's early, but my eye-test says he's a liability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...