Jump to content

Duquette: O's medical staff waited too long to address Tillman's shoulder?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Quote

 

Tillman, recovering from a right-shoulder issue, made his first rehabilitation at Double A start on Monday and could rejoin the rotation in early May.

Duquette believes the pitcher’s return date should have been sooner.

“We probably could have done a better job getting him back,” Duquette said.

Did the Orioles rush Tillman?

“I’m not sure we rushed him,” Duquette said. “I’m just disappointed he didn’t start the season with us. We had plenty of time to work with him. The shoulder was bothering him at the end of last year.”

Duquette did not elaborate, but he was upset with how the Orioles’ medical staff handled Tillman, according to two sources with knowledge of the situation.

“Obviously, it’s difficult to extend the season and pitch in the playoffs like Chris has in two of the last three seasons,” Duquette said. “Our approach was designed so he will be available again this year in October.”

 

http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/notes-baltimore-orioles-need-farm-system-to-develop-gems-041817

The story seems a little vague.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think being cautious with a shoulder injury is the smart way to go.  Tillman is not out of woods yet.    

As far as waiting too long to address it, maybe I don't know enough about what has happened but 1) they gave the shoulder time to rest after the season which sounds smart and then gave him an injection in December which required rest to work.   I am not complaining about how Tillman has been handle.  It would be worse if he had been rushed, got hurt and was out for the season.

If Tillman is able to get back by May 2nd and is effective at that time the O's will have minimized the loss of his services through April. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

Can't disagree with DD. They knew about it last year, but basically waited until ST to address it.  They should be called out. 

 

On the other hand, why didn't DD and the front office press the issue sooner? Or did they?

I don't know too many GMs that go public with this sort of stuff like DD does.

My guess is that they did press the issue at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

I don't know too many GMs that go public with this sort of stuff like DD does.

My guess is that they did press the issue at some point.

That's doesn't shock me anymore. I wanted DD gone after the Toronto debacle. 

Maybe DD is asking himself "What do I have to to do to get fired?". Idk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lost in the brashness of Duquette calling out the medical staff...is Tillman's role in all of this. The player almost *always* hides the severity of the issue. Who's to say that Tillman didn't hide this at the end of last year as just "I'm fine, typical season injuries". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The article states that they knew Tillman's shoulder was bothering him at the end of the season.    The cortisone shot seems to have done the trick.   Why wasn't the cortisone shot given to him back in December of January?     As it is, there is probably something more going on.   The cortisone shot just relieves the symptoms, it doesn't fix whatever the underlying problem that caused the pain in the first place.    His shoulder bothered him when the season ended.   It bothered him again when he started throwing in December.    They called it bursitis which I think is about the same as tendonitis which is about the same as "we don't know".       Now, I admit I know nothing about the medical field and am probably talking out of the wrong end but then again, I might have it right.

Which is exactly my point. Bursitis, tendonitis, etc. They're all repetitive stress injuries usually relieved (but not always fixed) by anti-inflammatories such as cortisone shots.

If Tillman was feeling it at the end of the season...I'm guessing the reason is as simple as Tillman saying: "It's the offseason, I'm not pitching, some rest and eventual rehabilitation will cure what ails me." 

Throwing the medical team under the bus here just seems asinine to me especially considering Duquette's checkered past (i.e. Gallardo). Let's not forget this is the same medical team that saved the O's ass when it came to guys like Balfour and other problematic players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dark Helmet said:

Can't disagree with DD. They knew about it last year, but basically waited until ST to address it.  They should be called out. 

 

On the other hand, why didn't DD and the front office press the issue sooner? Or did they?

Well said on both points.  Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...