Jump to content

O's are 12-4. Explain it.


wildcard

Recommended Posts

How are the O's doing so well?   

Bundy has started fast using his cutter but that is kind of offset but not having Tillman.   Triumbo is still starting in the outfield. The O's defensive improvement is marginal.  Overall the team is about the same as last year other then that.

What's going on?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Already explained it in another thread.   Four games all year where the starters have allowed more than three runs.    End of explanation.   

So its the starters?  Why?  Ubaldo is up and down.  Gausman's ERA is 7.23.  Is the pen better?  Is it the defense?  I understand that the starters have not allowed more than three run in all but for games but why?  Are they pitching better or getting better support for the defense and pen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Hot streak at beginning of season.  Bullpen has been great.  Winning almost all of the close ones.   IF

1. Bundy can handle 180+ IP

2. Tillman is 100 per cent

3. Miley is for real

4. Gausman is Gausman

5. Ubaldo doesn't stink

 

Should be a very good year.  There are still some icebergs up ahead but we have a top notch captain.

What are the icebergs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

So its the starters?  Why?  Ubaldo is up and down.  Gausman's ERA is 7.23.  Is the pen better?  Is it the defense?  I understand that the starters have not allowed more than three run in all but for games but why?  Are they pitching better or getting better support for the defense and pen?

They're pitching better.     The defense hasn't been that great, and the bullpen hasn't been any better than usual.    It's the starters, period.    

I just gave my synopsis of why the starters have been better in another thread.   Basically, it's Bundy and Miley, with the two good spot starts thrown in.   Gausman and Jimenez have not been better than last year (yet).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Doesn't that just mean the O's are not hitting.

It could mean the Blue Jays are not hitting, or the Red Sox are not hitting.

Generally speaking teams do not succeed at that level in close contests over the course of a season.

That being said the 2012 Orioles were a thing, as were the 2016 Rangers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Five and one in one run games.

Nine and one in games decided by two or fewer runs.

Because of their excellent bullpen, I usually expect the O's to fare well in close games.    But not this well, obviously.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

They're pitching better.     The defense hasn't been that great, and the bullpen hasn't been any better than usual.    It's the starters, period.    

I just gave my synopsis of why the starters have been better in another thread.   Basically, it's Bundy and Miley, with the two good spot starts thrown in.   Gausman and Jimenez have not been better than last year (yet).

So its not that Castillo calls a better game than Wieters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Only ones I’d look to extend now are Gunnar, and maybe Holliday or Basallo. Premium defensive positions and young enough to not worry about going past their primes. Westburg would need to be a team friendly deal as he’s older and I wonder if we’re getting his best years now. 
    • I've never played in a beer league software league.  Is it drunk programming?  Sounds fun. Don't a lot of beer leagues limit the amount of Homeruns you can hit? With the way pitching and defense is currently don't all team struggle to score when they don't hit HR?  Seven players hit .300.  It's pretty hard to string together three hits in an inning with what pitching looks like these days.
    • Gunnar is the only one you worry about. I would still sign Holliday as well but I think Gunnar is the bigger fish to fry. I no longer would consider an extension for Adley. I would wait on anyone else.
    • Something that doesn't show up on the stat sheet is something like being able to hit behind the runner to advance him.   The O's have been successful in building an analytics offense.   Focus on hitting homeruns, develop a swing to achieve optimum launch angle and exit velocity to hit the ball over the fence.  Result is they have a team of beer league software players and not baseball players and struggle to score when not hitting homeruns.   Analytically, if you review their offensive rankings for the season, it says, nothing wrong with the offense, at least from a macro review, but we all know that this offense has issues.   Runs - 4th Home runs - 3rd AVG - 7th OBP - 11th SLG - 3rd OPS - 4th  K's - 18th (this was interesting to see considering how much they seem to strikeout) All of the above looks good, nothing to fix. The O's had 6 sacrifice hits for the season, ranking 30th.  Interestingly, Arizona who led the league in runs scored also led the league in sacrifice hits with 34.   The O's do not need to necessarily to focus on small ball, but they do need to be able to add that skillset to their offensive arsenal.  
    • Sounds like Buck. Anything to get a slight advantage. It’s something this team sorely misses. 
    • Detroit has been so much fun to watch. They have Skubal and literally 11 completely interchangeable pitchers who Hinch uses at any time and in any situation. They all can start games, throw in middle relief, and close. Every Tigers pitcher has to be ready to come in at any time because nobody other than Skubal actually has a defined role, which can certainly help keep them focused.  That guy Holton who started Game 1 in Cleveland closed Game 3 yesterday.  Of course he did! And Hinch seems to have complete faith in everybody, which I guess works since they all seem to have rubber arms and never get tired. It must be so annoying as an opposing manager to try and game plan against them or to be a hitter and have absolutely no idea who you are going to be facing until you actually walk up to the plate.  Not sure how long this "gimmick" will last, but it has been really enjoyable.
    • So if Westburg ends up being a very good but not MVP level player you aren't interesting in extending him at a team friendly rate? I disagree with your strategy. If you can lock up even a young 3 win player at a team friendly rate I say do it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...