Jump to content

I Know The Draft is In A Few Hours...


Recommended Posts

But I'd like to know everyone's opinion of if we take Matusz with the 4th pick, are taking the best player on the board which is what Jordan and McPhail said they were going to do.

From everything I've read it looks like Hosmer, Alvarez, Beckham and Posey could possibly be ranked higher. I suppose it just depends on what website you're looking at.

I know it's been said plenty of times but if I were picking a pitcher with the 4th overall pick, I would expect it to be on someone with the ceiling of a frontline starter...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'd prefer a hitter, but anybody saying Matusz is a reach or a stupid pick is incredibly off base, IMO.

With the exception of a few guys here who have done an inordinate amount of research into this draft (Greg, Stotle, markpolis, apologies to any of the major contributors I'm forgetting) I don't see how any of our opinions should even be considered compared to what Joe Jordan thinks and decides to do. Almost none of us have seen any of these guys play, or know anything other than what other people tell us. Stats from HS and even college are close to worthless. Scouting is what sticks in the draft, and considering Jordan's track record, I'll be happy with whoever he picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the offensive talent in this draft, and our lack of hitting prospects, I want them to pick a hitter. And if they do pick a pitcher, he better be a future ace.
Bigbird asked this question before, but are we better off with one of the bats at #4 and a pitcher at #50 or Matusz at #4 and one of the remaining bats at #50. Being such a deep draft for bats, especially 1B, means there will likely still be premium offensive talent available in later rounds, not neccesarily the case for pitching.

I'll be a bit bummed out if we pass on Smoak, but I'd rather have Matusz than someone like G. Beckham or Posey or Alonso.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone else posted how happy they'd be to have Arietta, Tillman, Matusz, Hernandez and a couple of our other arms all in this organization at the same time. I cannot disagree.

It could also be argued that drafting Matusz might make a trade of Cabrera more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm as interested if not more interested to see how we do after the first round. We really need another good draft today.
I agree.

I'm excited to see what gems Jordan unlocks, and I'm sure the triumverant here (Greg, Stotle, Markpolis) will be overwhelming us with information on each and every pick so we can read up on these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.

I'm excited to see what gems Jordan unlocks, and I'm sure the triumverant here (Greg, Stotle, Markpolis) will be overwhelming us with information on each and every pick so we can read up on these guys.

We've easily had just as much success later in the draft as we've had in the first round the past couple years.

I know regardless of who we take in the first round or any round after that I'm not going to second guess it. I think Jordan has proven that he knows what he's doing.

Here's to a good draft day today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is something that I have not really thought of, but makes alot of sense.

Yeah, it's pure speculation, but I think McPhail could make a great case of trading just about every productive player on the O's to really stack the organization with young talent and solidify the franchise starting in 2010. If the value's there, I think he'd have to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is something that I have not really thought of, but makes alot of sense.

I can see where you'd be coming from with that line of thinking, but I doubt drafting a pitcher in the first round is going to make them more likely to deal Cabrera. We've got an abundance of pitching talent already in the minors. If they draft Matsuz it's because he's the best player on their board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I can’t emphasize enough how stupid that rain delay was.  No rain at all for 45 minutes, then two hours of light mist, the kind that teams play through all the time.  I was standing near the kids play area during most of the delay and believe me, that rain didn’t deter any kids from using the playground equipment for two hours. Then, 15 minutes before the game is going to start, the grounds crew is watering the infield.  What? The game itself was not worth the wait, needless to say.   But what annoys me most is the complete lack of communication during these delays.  How about letting the fans who are there know what the thinking is about how long the delay will be?  How about an update every 30 minutes or so.   Nope, nothing.   Just a generic message on the scoreboard saying that the start of the game will be delayed to to the “threat” of inclement weather.   My phone was showing .05” of rain expected in the next six hours.  Some threat! On the bright side, the team did announce that ticket holders would be given vouchers that could be used for a Monday - Thursday game.  That was the least they could do.       
    • 19,286 for that rain-delayed mess of a game.  I’d say about 2/3 of those stuck through the 3 hour delay and were in their seats at game time.  
    • And paid Scherzer, and Zimmerman, and Corbin, and Werth.   They didn’t all work out, but nobody could say the Nats didn’t spend to put a winning team on the field during their run.  The run basically ended because Stras II and Corbin blew up in their face.   But there’s always 2019.   
    • I can’t believe that 8 hours after Grayson stepped off the mound, I’m the first person to update his thread.   After a 19-day IL stint and without a rehab stint, Grayson threw 6 innings of one-hit shutout ball last night.  The one hit was an infield squibber hit 59.5 mph off the bat.  His command was a tad shaky at times, as he walked three and hit a batter, but he still breezed through 6 innings on 82 pitches, 50 for strikes.  If it hadn’t been his first outing in three weeks, he certainly could have pitched the 7th inning.  Unfortunately, the bullpen blew it for him. Fastball topped out at 98.4 and he was still hitting 97 in his final inning.  
    • I think half of Fangraphs’ staff over the years came from Lookout Landing.   I rarely read other teams’ sites, but I agree Pinstripe Alley is one of the best Yankee sites.     
    • For one thing, they don’t have Bautista shutting things down in the 9th inning or extra innings.   Second, 30-16 just doesn’t happen every year.  I’m actually pretty encouraged that the O’s have played .650 baseball without winning a disproportionate number of close games.    
    • Four more shutout innings for Chace last night, 2 hits, 3 walks, 6 strikeouts.   His ERA is 0.91, WHiP 1.21, K/9 12.7.   The only blemish is his 5.2 BB/9.   He’s pitched 8 games and has only allowed runs in two of them.   Yesterday he threw 45 of 68 pitches for strikes.  For some reason the O’s kind of have him under wraps, as he’s only been allowed to exceed 70 pitches twice, back in April.  He’s also been kept to four inning outings.  They’re clearly being very careful with the 20-year old (turns 21 in three weeks).  In fairness, they did need to shut him down for a month late last summer, so I’m guessing it’s more season load management than game-by-game decisions.   In any event, it’s been a promising campaign for Chace.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...