Jump to content

Are There Three Internal SP Candidates


Eddie_Ripken

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, TommyPickles said:

I think Ynoa could be a MLB #4-5 starter. The Mets scouts seemed to think so back in the day. He’s looked strong at times, just seems inconsistent.

I think he’ll get a few starts for the Os before the All Star break.

I could see shelling out the money for Cobb (I know this isn’t going to happen), and then just filling the other two spots internally.  Unlikely to be a playoff team, but I think it’d be an interesting team to watch.

I think he’s got a chance too. His fastball has good velocity and late life, the slider is good enough and when he’s on, he can really hit his spots. The lack of a third MLB quality pitch hurts him and I’d like to see improvement of his changeup. Even without it, I think he can eat some innings respectably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I think he’s got a chance too. His fastball has good velocity and late life, the slider is good enough and when he’s on, he can really hit his spots. The lack of a third MLB quality pitch hurts him and I’d like to see improvement of his changeup. Even without it, I think he can eat some innings respectably.

I certainly would much rather watch Ynoa than Ubaldo or Wright or even Miley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, interloper said:

I certainly would much rather watch Ynoa than Ubaldo or Wright or even Miley.

I certainly don't want to watch a tanked season, but I feel the same as you. I would rather see some of the younger guys than retreads.

That talk sounds so similar to 5 -10 years ago here on OH "I'd much rather them bring up the young guys than to see.....play". As disappointing as the notion that we are heading back to those days is, I do feel that MAYBE the "young guys" this time around may be a little better than they were 8-10 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Eddie_Ripken said:

I certainly don't want to watch a tanked season, but I feel the same as you. I would rather see some of the younger guys than retreads.

That talk sounds so similar to 5 -10 years ago here on OH "I'd much rather them bring up the young guys than to see.....play". As disappointing as the notion that we are heading back to those days is, I do feel that MAYBE the "young guys" this time around may be a little better than they were 8-10 years ago.

Are they?   Among the seasoned MiL pitchers, I doubt it.   8-10 years ago we had Matusz, Tillman, Arrieta, Britton, Bergesen, Hernandez and others percolating up through our system.    Several of those guys fizzled, at least as starters, but at the time they were a much more highly-rated group than the current one.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Are they?   Among the seasoned MiL pitchers, I doubt it.   8-10 years ago we had Matusz, Tillman, Arrieta, Britton, Bergesen, Hernandez and others percolating up through our system.    Several of those guys fizzled, at least as starters, but at the time they were a much more highly-rated group than the current one.   

You are right Frobby, the system now has some interesting SP prospects (good depth too, especially in the lower levels) but the only guy who is a top 100 guy is Harvey. Now there are a few guys who could be right there if they have good 2018s, but right now no.  The Orioles position prospects are much stronger now than back then however.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Luke-OH said:

You are right Frobby, the system now has some interesting SP prospects (good depth too, especially in the lower levels) but the only guy who is a top 100 guy is Harvey. Now there are a few guys who could be right there if they have good 2018s, but right now no.  The Orioles position prospects are much stronger now than back then however.  

And the younger guys intrigue me. Lots to follow at Frederick and Delmarva this year, but that’s not going to do our major league rotation any good.    

I keep forgetting about Harvey, but I still think it’s 2019 before he can really help us, and that’s if everything goes great.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Are they?   Among the seasoned MiL pitchers, I doubt it.   8-10 years ago we had Matusz, Tillman, Arrieta, Britton, Bergesen, Hernandez and others percolating up through our system.    Several of those guys fizzled, at least as starters, but at the time they were a much more highly-rated group than the current one.   

True. Those guys were rated higher and I guess I am thinking with more of a hindsight is 20/20 mentality. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Are they?   Among the seasoned MiL pitchers, I doubt it.   8-10 years ago we had Matusz, Tillman, Arrieta, Britton, Bergesen, Hernandez and others percolating up through our system.    Several of those guys fizzled, at least as starters, but at the time they were a much more highly-rated group than the current one.   

By 2019 Bundy, Gausman and Harvey may be better than anything the O's got out of those pitchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would argue that starting pitching isn't all that important anymore. Not with the way teams are using them. Look at the world series, they were taking all-star pitchers out of games after the 1st or 2nd time through the order. They were even using starters in relief, knowing they only had to face the order 1 time or if at the bottom of the order twice. You need a couple of guys that can eat up innings in the regular season just so you don't overuse the pen. If you look around lots of teams need pitching. A lot of people on here seem to be pretty hard on the Orioles and their system. Unless the Orioles do a complete gut job, like the Astros and now the White Sox, nothing will change. Ask the Tigers' fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, wildcard said:

By 2019 Bundy, Gausman and Harvey may be better than anything the O's got out of those pitchers.

I’m not talking about Bundy and Gausman, I’m talking about guys in the minors now.    I do hope that Bundy and Gausman outproduce the guys I named.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m not talking about Bundy and Gausman, I’m talking about guys in the minors now.    I do hope that Bundy and Gausman outproduce the guys I named.     

But back in the years you were sighting there was no one on the O's major league roster like Bundy and Gausman.   Tillman would reach that  level.  Arrieta got traded before he reached that level.  No one either did as a starter.   So Bundy, Gauman and Harvey could turn out better than what we saw back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, wildcard said:

But back in the years you were sighting there was no one on the O's major league roster like Bundy and Gausman.   Tillman would reach that  level.  Arrieta got traded before he reached that level.  No one either did as a starter.   So Bundy, Gauman and Harvey could turn out better than what we saw back then.

I was responding to a post about the young guys we might bring in to fill our three open spots. Gausman is essentially the equivalent of Guthrie from that period, though younger.     There really isn’t an equivalent to Bundy.   We brought in Koji to be a starter in 2009, but he didn’t have the stamina for it.   We brought Millwood in as a one-year stopgap in 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I was responding to a post about the young guys we might bring in to fill our three open spots. Gausman is essentially the equivalent of Guthrie from that period, though younger.     There really isn’t an equivalent to Bundy.   We brought in Koji to be a starter in 2009, but he didn’t have the stamina for it.   We brought Millwood in as a one-year stopgap in 2010.

Right, there was not equivalent to what Bundy,  Gausman and Harvey might become.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

Have you seen him pitch this winter?    If not, then what’s the basis for your conclusion?    I certainly agree that he showed nothing last year, so unless he’s made some major strides over the winter he won’t be back in the majors this year.  

The basis of my conclusion is the way he pitched at the end of last year. The drop in velocity. The changes to his off-speed pitches. Watching him warm up before his last start and seeing not one ball hit the catcher's mitt. Also, the fact that his injury was a shoulder injury, and they are tough to come back from. Also, the fact that he altered his motion to favor the shoulder in 2016 and was not able to find his old motion all last season. Pitchers have been screwing up their mechanics to favor injuries for a long time, going back to Dizzy Dean, whose toe was broken in the 1937 All Star game and his alteration of his mechanics ruining what was left of his career. 

If I'm wrong, good for him. If I'm right, he is Brad Bergesen II.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
    • Fair point, but these outliers are squatting like 40% more than Holliday is.  There are likely plenty of guys in the NCAA that can hit Holliday's numbers, and are in his age range.   There were like 50+ guys at this year's combine with a 10 yard split of 1.5 or better or 40 times of 4.5 or better, and 1rm squat correlates with both 10 yard split and 40 time, such that if you hit those numbers in 10 or 40, then your mean 1rm squat would be predicted to be about 2.5x body weight, which would be right around 500 lbs for a 200 lb guy.  If you want to call NFL caliber college guys outliers, I guess?  But Holliday is an MLB caliber guy, so he still fits.   Elite athletes just aren't normal, man.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...