Jump to content

2018 Mike Wright


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 497
  • Created
  • Last Reply
20 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Not only are we talking about Wright as a starter, but he's our [spring training] Opening Day starter.

That's right, we've waited 145 days for Orioles baseball and our reward Friday is seeing the first pitch thrown by Mike Wright!

Meh, it’s two innings at most.    I hope he does well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Putting him on display early for a possible trade? Even if he has a good spring Wright is not the type of pitcher I trust. He seems to be a head case on the mound and he's out of options. Let's see if we can see a return of any kind for him instead of DFA at the end of ST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oriole said:

Putting him on display early for a possible trade? Even if he has a good spring Wright is not the type of pitcher I trust. He seems to be a head case on the mound and he's out of options. Let's see if we can see a return of any kind for him instead of DFA at the end of ST.

The only return you will get is a similar type player: a guy out of options at a different position. Perhaps another team will be convinced he can be a solid reliever, but even so, you can get a very raw low-A player with a reasonable upside, but a low likelihood of reach it...at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jamalshw said:

The only return you will get is a similar type player: a guy out of options at a different position. Perhaps another team will be convinced he can be a solid reliever, but even so, you can get a very raw low-A player with a reasonable upside, but a low likelihood of reach it...at best.

It was just my guess as to why he is being put out so early. He doesn't have much of a chance as a starter and the bullpen is already pretty full. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, oriole said:

It was just my guess as to why he is being put out so early. He doesn't have much of a chance as a starter and the bullpen is already pretty full. 

I think he has a shot in the pen. The rotation has one open spot. If I had to guess, it goes to Cortes unless someone else is signed. For the pen (with Britton out) there are four locks: Brach, O'Day, Givens and Bleier. That leaves three spots. One of those spots will be a long reliever. I would imagine Miguel Castro gets one of those spots unless he makes the rotation, but he could also be sent to Triple-A to continue to be stretched out as a starter to provide much-needed depth in the rotation. If that's the case, the long reliever spot could go to Wright or Ynoa. I think one of the two doesn't make the cut and is DFA'ed or dealt for a PTNL/cash, but I think one stays. It's possible both do, but I would think at least one of vacant spots goes to a LHP (Hart) and other arms like Edgin, Melville, Wojciechowski, Mesa, Asher, Araujo, Crichton, Liranzo, etc. will all get looks, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s a pretty strained article by Melewski trying to compare Wright’s situation to Chris Tillman’s back in 2012 or so.   http://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2018/02/can-mike-wright-follow-chris-tillmans-path-to-turnaround.html

Well yeah, Wright’s like any other pitcher who ever lived who struggled for three years and was out of options.     But the Tillman analogy doesn’t hold up for at least three reasons:

1.   Tillman wasn’t out of options when he broke out.    His third option was used to send him down  at the start of 2012, he was called up before the all star break and never looked back.   

2.   Tillman was still only 24 when he finally got over the hump, and he debuted at 21.   Wright’s 28 this year and was 25 the first time he reached the majors.

3.    The article grudgingly admits about halfway through that Wright was never a top 100 prospect in baseball, unlike Tillman.   Tillman was, in fact, ranked 22nd by BA and 16th by BP going into 2009.   He was much, much more highly regarded than Wright, for good reason.  

So, nice try, Steve.   I do hope the fourth time’s the charm for Wright and he finds a way to be a productive major leaguer.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m no scout but I just don’t see (and have never seen) why the O’s are so enamored with Wright.  I could understand if he had a few appearances where he showed flashes of being a good MLB starter but he just hasn’t.  If they’re trotting him out there “hoping” he has a few nice starts in order to try and trade him, fine but I honestly don’t think that’s the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, millertime said:

I’m no scout but I just don’t see (and have never seen) why the O’s are so enamored with Wright.  I could understand if he had a few appearances where he showed flashes of being a good MLB starter but he just hasn’t.  If they’re trotting him out there “hoping” he has a few nice starts in order to try and trade him, fine but I honestly don’t think that’s the case.

Enamored is a stretch, even the Orioles aren’t that blind. Out of the guys who are vying for the 5th spot, I’d put Wright at the back of the line. He’s behind the Rule 5 guys. If he looks good and can bring any value in trade then they come out ahead.

I really hope Wright does well in any case, though, just because of all he and his family have personally suffered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, millertime said:

I’m no scout but I just don’t see (and have never seen) why the O’s are so enamored with Wright.  I could understand if he had a few appearances where he showed flashes of being a good MLB starter but he just hasn’t.  If they’re trotting him out there “hoping” he has a few nice starts in order to try and trade him, fine but I honestly don’t think that’s the case.

He has the tools to be good. I've heard it stated that his only problems are within himself.  Supposedly, hope springs eternal that those failures could be corrected. As opposed to his old stablemate Tyler Wilson, who had no stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, weams said:

He has the tools to be good. I've heard it stated that his only problems are within himself.  Supposedly, hope springs eternal that those failures could be corrected. As opposed to his old stablemate Tyler Wilson, who had no stuff. 

I dunno.   Decent fastball but not much movement and mediocre command of it; very mediocre secondaries.    I’m not so sure I’d say he has the tools to be good.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

Here’s a pretty strained article by Melewski trying to compare Wright’s situation to Chris Tillman’s back in 2012 or so.   http://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2018/02/can-mike-wright-follow-chris-tillmans-path-to-turnaround.html

Well yeah, Wright’s like any other pitcher who ever lived who struggled for three years and was out of options.     But the Tillman analogy doesn’t hold up for at least three reasons:

1.   Tillman wasn’t out of options when he broke out.    His third option was used to send him down  at the start of 2012, he was called up before the all star break and never looked back.   

2.   Tillman was still only 24 when he finally got over the hump, and he debuted at 21.   Wright’s 28 this year and was 25 the first time he reached the majors.

3.    The article grudgingly admits about halfway through that Wright was never a top 100 prospect in baseball, unlike Tillman.   Tillman was, in fact, ranked 22nd by BA and 16th by BP going into 2009.   He was much, much more highly regarded than Wright, for good reason.  

So, nice try, Steve.   I do hope the fourth time’s the charm for Wright and he finds a way to be a productive major leaguer.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...