Jump to content

Chris Davis Trade Possible in 2019-20?


Bradysburns

Recommended Posts

On 7/31/2018 at 12:05 PM, Can_of_corn said:

I'm rooting for one of two things.

1- He bounces back to replacement level production the next couple of years.

2-A season or two more like this one forces the team to DFA him or him to retire.

He could get suspended. Again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply
On 7/31/2018 at 2:15 PM, oriole said:

Are there any other contracts around baseball that are comparable in their awfulness? Because the only trade we are doing involving Davis are bad contract swaps.

There are probably a few teams that look at his juicy numbers a few years ago and think they can get him back on track.  I don't think we get a player back with a bad contract.  I think we find a team willing to take him with us paying most of the contract off and just wiping him from the books.  My feeling is, they can't go into a new season with a youthful roster while Chris Davis, their signature signing and constant reminder of this year's futility, potentially flops majorly again.  They can't take that PR chance.  His days are numbered, imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, WI O’s Fan said:

How about a swap of bad contracts w sf.  Samardzija And melencon. Their contracts expire in 2020.  40 mil owed samarja and 28 owed melenan = 68 mil. Davis owed 68+ deferred.  O’s eat the deferred.  Sf saves 17 mil a year 19& 20.  Maybe o’s send 10 mil in 21.

I like the creativity.  Where are the other crappy contracts in baseball right now?  Jordan Zimmerman is still out there and Cabrera for the Tigers.  Heyward on the Cubs.  Pujols?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, WI O’s Fan said:

How about a swap of bad contracts w sf.  Samardzija And melencon. Their contracts expire in 2020.  40 mil owed samarja and 28 owed melenan = 68 mil. Davis owed 68+ deferred.  O’s eat the deferred.  Sf saves 17 mil a year 19& 20.  Maybe o’s send 10 mil in 21.

The problem is the players you mentioned might be overpaid, but they at least have some value. Davis has no value AND he's vastly overpaid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

There are probably a few teams that look at his juicy numbers a few years ago and think they can get him back on track.  I don't think we get a player back with a bad contract.  I think we find a team willing to take him with us paying most of the contract off and just wiping him from the books.  My feeling is, they can't go into a new season with a youthful roster while Chris Davis, their signature signing and constant reminder of this year's futility, potentially flops majorly again.  They can't take that PR chance.  His days are numbered, imo.

I disagree. Davis is done and everyone in MLB knows it. No one will waste a roster spot on him and the only reason the O's are is money. For real, if Davis was a FA this offseason he would have trouble finding a minor league deal. He'd find one of course, but it wouldn't be easy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oriole said:

I disagree. Davis is done and everyone in MLB knows it. No one will waste a roster spot on him and the only reason the O's are is money. For real, if Davis was a FA this offseason he would have trouble finding a minor league deal. He'd find one of course, but it wouldn't be easy. 

Some Oriole posters disregard the facts, when it comes to what they want to see happen with the club.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

There are probably a few teams that look at his juicy numbers a few years ago and think they can get him back on track.  I don't think we get a player back with a bad contract.  I think we find a team willing to take him with us paying most of the contract off and just wiping him from the books.  My feeling is, they can't go into a new season with a youthful roster while Chris Davis, their signature signing and constant reminder of this year's futility, potentially flops majorly again.  They can't take that PR chance.  His days are numbered, imo.

There's really not. His ability (or lack there of) and his contract basically make him the baseball equivalent of a leper. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

There are probably a few teams that look at his juicy numbers a few years ago and think they can get him back on track.  I don't think we get a player back with a bad contract.  I think we find a team willing to take him with us paying most of the contract off and just wiping him from the books.  My feeling is, they can't go into a new season with a youthful roster while Chris Davis, their signature signing and constant reminder of this year's futility, potentially flops majorly again.  They can't take that PR chance.  His days are numbered, imo.

There's also the PR nightmare scenario where the team eats the contract and Davis goes on to find a moderate (or stunning) resurgence with another team. Currently, the team has only made one enormous miscalculation and a large portion of blame has fallen on the player. The money is spent either way, does the downside of blocking a prospect outweigh the risk of royally and very publicly screwing the proverbial pooch *AGAIN*? Laughingstock wouldn't begin to describe it. Not advocating any particular approach, just sayin...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...