Jump to content

If Andy MacPhail was the O's GM....


wildcard

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

My goodness. The obsession with AM on the OH is so bizarre and weird. He made some good trades, definitely. But that’s  all he did. He was a pretty lousy GM besides that. People celebrating the Bedard Trade like we got a ring. 

Give it up, let her go. Move on with your life:) 

Not to mention, as good as the Bedatd trade was, we still had four more losing seasons after that trade before we finally made the playoffs in 2012...under Dan Duquette.  AM made some good trades and established a core, exactly what Dan just did, but it is not a magic pill that turns a team into an instant winner. There is way too much revisionist history when people think of AM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Yeah, not sure where you are coming from here.

Neither Gausman or Schoop are Bedard level players.

Although I would have liked to have seen at least one impact guy gotten in return, neither player's value was going to much higher than they are right now.

Let's face it with Gausman. He's really a #4 pitcher, maybe #3 at best. He'll pitch better in the NL because they only have to pitch to 7 major league hitters out of 9 in the lineup (#8 guy gets waked a lot in order to pitch to the pitcher) but he was not going to be a guy you extend so might as well move him.

As for Schoop, he has major red flags for plate discipline and his range will only diminish as he gets older. I loved watching Schoop for the Orioles, but he was free agent next year and if the Orioles want him back after next year he'll be a free agent and they'll have money to spend (not saying they would do it).

Let's face it, MacPhail made one great trade with the Mariners for Bedard. I think the Orioles got a decent return for the two considering the fact that Orioles fans probably value Gausman and Schoop more than the rest of baseball.

Gausman is a career underachiever who will likely get a boost playing in the NL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

just think what he could have gotten for Schoop and Gausman.

I am not saying that MacPhail  should be the O's GM.  But the difference between what he could get in return for a trade seems massive compared to what Dan Duquette got for Jonathan and Kevin.

What? That's nuts. Especially if saving money was also an ownership directive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jones and Tillman

Ortiz and Jean Encarnacion and possibly Victor Victor. Easily has the same footprint in the relative time. Projection of actual return is impossible at this point. 

Two late first rounders.

Two high upside A Ball players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weams said:

Jones and Tillman

Ortiz and Jean Encarnacion and possibly Victor Victor. Easily has the same footprint in the relative time. Projection of actual return is impossible at this point. 

Two late first rounders.

Two high upside A Ball players.

And the best international position player. And he is not a 16 year old. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

O'Day is not going to help out the Braves in 2018.

He might not even be on the team in 2019.   I think of O'Day being included in the trade as a 12 million dollar payment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Right now the Braves are very happy that Andy runs the Phillies. He sat on his hands while the Braves made bold moves. Phillies could have landed Machado. Guess it didn't percolate.

They could have had Gausman as well. And Britton They could have used them all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weams said:

They could have had Gausman as well. And Britton They could have used them all. 

I thought Andy was the president and not the GM.  Does he make player trade decisions for the Phillies?  I think MacPhail is overrated on here.  Maybe compare these trades to what Cashman could have gotten out of these players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whammer said:

Heard the post-trade interview with Anthopolos on MLB radio. He sure wasn't ranting and raving about Gausman. Talked more in terms of Gausman's inconsistency and their plans to work with him to improve. Said the trade was risky but they decided to take that risk to keep his top prospects in the system. Other options would have cost him prospects they wanted to keep.

 

Reading comments by Braves fans on MLBtraderumors.  Some Braves fans don't believe Gausman is even an upgrade for the Braves rotation.  I don't know much about the Braves rotation, but I wouldn't want to start Gausman in a win or go home playoff game.  I guess as an O's fan, I placed a high value on Gausman, but he's never done more than hint at his true potential.  What team is going to give up their top prospects for a pitcher that regularly goes from pitching 7+ shutout innings to giving up 5 runs by the 3rd inning.  Was he mentored by Ubaldo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...