Jump to content

Our Guys Have Been Horrible For Other Teams.


ORIOLE33

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

I'm not upset that Gausman was traded. I'm upset that the return was poor.

We all knew Gausman would put up good numbers in the NL. That was expected. We got Atlanta to eat salary. I don’t think we can judge this trade until the deadline has passed for us to spend international slot money. Let’s see what we do. 

If we don’t spend the money we saved on VVM, then this trade looks terrible. If we do land VVM then it looks good. The argument would then be that VVM was better than any prospect the Braves were willing to trade us and we will have saved a bit of O’day money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply
17 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

I'm not upset that Gausman was traded. I'm upset that the return was poor.

I don't necessarily disagree, I am just more open to seeing what the return actually is over it's full lifetime.  There is no question that the haul for Archer was much better.  But it does kind of depend on all that money.  I hope you are wrong. We'll see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We all knew Gausman would put up good numbers in the NL. That was expected. We got Atlanta to eat salary. I don’t think we can judge this trade until the deadline has passed for us to spend international slot money. Let’s see what we do. 

If we don’t spend the money we saved on VVM, then this trade looks terrible. If we do land VVM then it looks good. The argument would then be that VVM was better than any prospect the Braves were willing to trade us and we will have saved a bit of O’day money. 

I just don't think they should be related. That international slot money wasn't worth much to the Braves considering most of the premium players are signed already. And that $2.5m isn't going to net them VVM.

So the problem here...is how does Gausman for 2+ years at a reasonable salary net you essentially just a salary dump and so-so prospects? The O'Day salary dump shouldn't have been included, honestly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

I just don't think they should be related. That international slot money wasn't worth much to the Braves considering most of the premium players are signed already. And that $2.5m isn't going to net them VVM.

So the problem here...is how does Gausman for 2+ years at a reasonable salary net you essentially just a salary dump and so-so prospects? The O'Day salary dump shouldn't have been included, honestly.

Aren't the Braves still under penalty in the International Market?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookitsPuck said:

I just don't think they should be related. That international slot money wasn't worth much to the Braves considering most of the premium players are signed already. And that $2.5m isn't going to net them VVM.

So the problem here...is how does Gausman for 2+ years at a reasonable salary net you essentially just a salary dump and so-so prospects? The O'Day salary dump shouldn't have been included, honestly.

I agree they gave away something they couldn't use...but how can you not include O'Day.  They have to pay him.  If it's that easy to discard the value of that...maybe there is hope for trading Crud Davis. ;) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

I just don't think they should be related. That international slot money wasn't worth much to the Braves considering most of the premium players are signed already. And that $2.5m isn't going to net them VVM.

So the problem here...is how does Gausman for 2+ years at a reasonable salary net you essentially just a salary dump and so-so prospects? The O'Day salary dump shouldn't have been included, honestly.

That 2.5M on top of what they already have, gives them the most money to go after VVM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Aren't the Braves still under penalty in the International Market?

correct

Quote

Atlanta will be prohibited from signing any international player for more than $10,000 during the 2019-20 signing period and its international signing bonus pool for the 2020-21 signing period will be reduced by 50 percent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2018 at 11:21 AM, ORIOLE33 said:

Schoop has spent time on the bench he’s been so bad. Gausman hasn’t exactly turned it around. Zach has been dreadfully bad. Even Manny hasn’t exactly been all that good since going to LA. So far, all these trades are looking pretty good.

With that being said, I want to see our former players do well, particularly Schoop and Manny. I’m not too surprised that Schoop has struggled, but I expected more from Manny. He wants that HUGE contract, he better turn it around.

Gausman is 2-1 with an ERA under 3 and a WHIP just over 1. I'd say that's pretty damn good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

Gausman is 2-1 with an ERA under 3 and a WHIP just over 1. I'd say that's pretty damn good.

Agreed, but it’s not like anybody’s results mean much yet.   Can we wait longer than 3 starts before jumping to conclusions?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Malike said:

Gausman is a 2 pitch pitcher in a new league. I suspect he will end up close to what he was here once teams get used to seeing him.

I like him a lot. He will do well there. We got a few guys and offloaded O'Day. Which I realize means nothing to anyone not paying for O'Day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Agreed, but it’s not like anybody’s results mean much yet.   Can we wait longer than 3 starts before jumping to conclusions?    

Gausman was always a second half pitcher. Why, I don't know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Agreed, but it’s not like anybody’s results mean much yet.   Can we wait longer than 3 starts before jumping to conclusions?    

The OP said that all the former Orioles have been horrible so far. I was just pointing put that Gausman has been good. Though I figured a change of scenery (especially to the NL) would benefit Gausman. Wait until he wins 20 next year. Ledges look out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dark Helmet said:

The OP said that all the former Orioles have been horrible so far. I was just pointing put that Gausman has been good.

Yeah, that’s why I started out with “agreed.”   It’s silly to be judging results yet, but the OP was wrong about several players’ performance to date.    Gausman certainly has done a good job for Atlanta so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...