Jump to content

WaPo: Spin Rates and Buy In


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply
On 1/9/2019 at 9:21 AM, Frobby said:

It’s by far his most effective pitch, but I do worry about the cumulative effect on his arm of throwing it too often.   

I'd rather have 3 years of a 3.00 era pitcher than 5 years of a 4.50 era pitcher.  Sorry Dylan :-).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great stuff all over this thread, Luke!  A great contribution.  (I would like to see the OH put the articles highlighted on the front page into their own threads - with the thread linked below the article.  Not intuitive right now on how a reader might comment on an article - one has to first find it embedded in another thread?  Just a suggestion.)

I was most intrigued by Bard among the names in the article.  He seems to have the best FB among the three listed.

Regarding the general discussion in this thread, I have the following thoughts:

 - is there an expectation that the Orioles will have databases developed and analytics produced in time for ST?  A lot of mention here of the pitchers who might be helped most by what can be produced by our new analytics group, but the implication is that the Orioles might have the full range of quality information provided to Astros players within four or five months of ME's hiring.  I am sure there is some pitch mix and other data that can be worked relatively quickly (most of which I assume our prior GM had), but I would be pleasantly surprised if our front office would have the full tools at its disposal as ME had in Houston in such a short amount of time especially when a fairly different database to process draft candidates likely has a higher priority.

 - I think the major league and high minors pitchers who could really see results spike with incremental improvement are Scott, Carroll and Bundy (all as mentioned in this thread) and perhaps Cobb.  I worry Bundy's FB gets hit too hard so it will be interesting to see what tweaks are made with him.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/9/2019 at 7:07 PM, Can_of_corn said:

 

big-mistake.gif

Per your source, Bundy’s best fastball - on the day (05/29/17) that inspired the 95mph heat tweet - was 95.40, his previous start was 6 days prior. In 2018, as fate would have it, Dylan Bundy pitched on the exact same day, in the exact same place, on less rest ...

his best fb...

on May 29th..

2018...

was...

95.53.

Weams said, Bundy no longer has what he had in the clip I shared, but evidence shows - Bundy had more, on the same day, on less rest, just this past season. 

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/9/2019 at 7:39 PM, Flash- bd said:

Still can't believe that *expletive* Gausman trade. Would've liked to see what a competent organization could've done with his value. Well, I guess we already saw some of that in Atlanta. 

 

What still pisses me off about the Duquette regime is how little value we got from Gausman, Arrieta, Eduardo Rodriguez, and Zach Davies. We actually produced a decent amount of pitching talent in those year but got so little from it. Inexcusable from a low-mid payroll franchise that by definition must punch above its weight. 

At least they turned Hader into something nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Cy Bundy said:

At least they turned Hader into something nice.

The Astros traded Hader as well. They got 1/2 year of Carlos Gomez. 

Here is a retrospective on the trade   They didn’t even reluctantly give him up  

 

https://www.jsonline.com/story/sports/columnists/tom-haudricourt/2018/04/20/haudricourt-because-there-crying-baseball-brewers-have-josh-hader-bullpen-force/526901002/

Melvin admitted to wondering why the Astros were willing to part with Hader so soon after acquiring him from the Orioles.

“It’s funny that he’s been traded twice,” Melvin said. “It makes you wonder why. Is there something we don’t know? Maybe they just figured he’d be a reliever.

“Even if people thought he was a reliever, he still had a chance to be a dominant reliever.”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Great stuff all over this thread, Luke!  A great contribution.  (I would like to see the OH put the articles highlighted on the front page into their own threads - with the thread linked below the article.  Not intuitive right now on how a reader might comment on an article - one has to first find it embedded in another thread?  Just a suggestion.)

I was most intrigued by Bard among the names in the article.  He seems to have the best FB among the three listed.

Regarding the general discussion in this thread, I have the following thoughts:

 - is there an expectation that the Orioles will have databases developed and analytics produced in time for ST?  A lot of mention here of the pitchers who might be helped most by what can be produced by our new analytics group, but the implication is that the Orioles might have the full range of quality information provided to Astros players within four or five months of ME's hiring.  I am sure there is some pitch mix and other data that can be worked relatively quickly (most of which I assume our prior GM had), but I would be pleasantly surprised if our front office would have the full tools at its disposal as ME had in Houston in such a short amount of time especially when a fairly different database to process draft candidates likely has a higher priority.

 - I think the major league and high minors pitchers who could really see results spike with incremental improvement are Scott, Carroll and Bundy (all as mentioned in this thread) and perhaps Cobb.  I worry Bundy's FB gets hit too hard so it will be interesting to see what tweaks are made with him.  

 

Yeah, that's on me, I agree with you. I was about to head to bed after being up all night taking care of newborn twins and I just linked it in relevant articles rather than start a new thread.

Bard is a guy I like too, he was in my top 5 for the Rule 5 draft in 2017. 

I think while the Orioles weren't on the cutting edge of analytics, they did gather data, so I think there will be plenty to work with (albeit not everything they were used to in Houston). I think it's worth mentioning that this will be new to a lot of players in the org as well, so there may be more low hanging fruit as far as useful tweaks to be made. 

Now regarding producing a draft model or player acquisition model in order to take emotion out of the process, that will likely take longer to recreate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

Yeah, that's on me, I agree with you. I was about to head to bed after being up all night taking care of newborn twins and I just linked it in relevant articles rather than start a new thread.

Bard is a guy I like too, he was in my top 5 for the Rule 5 draft in 2017. 

I think while the Orioles weren't on the cutting edge of analytics, they did gather data, so I think there will be plenty to work with (albeit not everything they were used to in Houston). I think it's worth mentioning that this will be new to a lot of players in the org as well, so there may be more low hanging fruit as far as useful tweaks to be made. 

Now regarding producing a draft model or player acquisition model in order to take emotion out of the process, that will likely take longer to recreate. 

Thanks for all of your posts and taking the time for the articles. I put up repositories for commentary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...