Jump to content

The Chris Davis Effect


milbest77

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I remember when we got him, kinda disappointed.  But then he really came into his own in 2012, a big part of a very fun team.  

I remember September 6th, 2012 because I was headed to Philly for an appointment, the girl I was with at the time was along with me.  As we drove through Baltimore it dawned on me that...hey, the Yankees are in town tonight and...I should cancel the appointment, we should spend the day in Baltimore and get tickets for the game.  Which we did.  

Of course Sept 6th is a special day in Orioles history as it's the date Cal broke Gehrig's streak.  I remember they had a little ceremony before the game, Cal was there, congratulated Buck on a great season.  The Orioles won that game 10-6, Davis hit a homer and the place went nuts.  That game was one of the most fun experiences I've had at a game in person, Reynolds hit 2 homers, Jones hit one, I think Wieters did, too.  Pretty sure the one that Davis hit was for an insurance run but it didn't matter, it was still awesome.  

This thread isn't a personal attack, and I feel bad for him in some ways, too.  No one likes to be terrible at their job.  No one.  I don't care who you are or what you do or how much money you make... if you're bad at your job, your life is probably miserable.  Add to that the pressure of a giant contract, several thousand people dissecting your every move and beating a very dead horse as to just how TERRIBLE you are...it's gotta suck.  No one is writing articles about some guy in a cube farm at some random company in Iowa about how HISTORICALLY BAD THEY ARE AT THEIR JOB.

"But Moose, I don't feel bad for the guy, he's gonna go cry himself to sleep in his piles of money!  Hard for me to feel bad for that guy, ha ha ha!!"

"But Moose, Palmer said he didn't work hard in the offseason!!!1111 I need to see the effortssssssssaaahhhhhh"

Just STFU.

That said, you are right, this is a business.  Unfortunately, I am not sure how likely they'll be able to get rid of that contract, at the very least he's going to be paid by the Orioles for years to come no matter if he's on the roster or not.  For me, getting him off the team provides the chance for Mancini to be moved to 1B/DH, the possibility of Mountcastle to get called up and platoon him with Mancini at 1B/DH and put one of Hays/Stewart/Diaz/Santander in RF or LF.  

 

That’s cool you got to go to that Yankees game. I was living in Richmond, VA at the time (but I am from Baltimore originally). I was living in a dingy little apartment, watching the game on my old-school non-flatscreen TV, and was screaming at the top of my lungs when we came back with all those bombs after being down. Thank goodness I got MASN down there. Not sure how I wasn’t evicted?

Being able to share these stories, though, is what this whole thing is all about. Now, it’s time to build up towards some new ones to share?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Nah, no worries, wasn't looking for credit or anything.  Just saying, I'm glad someone else noticed this, too :) 

In regards to the appreciation thread, I will say it's sad that the great moments/years he had here will be inevitably overshadowed by how terrible he's finished.  The Orioles, for a real long time, didn't have a big time masher in their lineup.  You might say that Raffy was the last big time power hitter they had, but even then I still don't think of Raffy as a guy who had big time power for some reason, even though I know that inclination is wrong.  I wish Albert Belle's career wasn't cut short because he was fun to watch, a menacing presence and I think he could have had a few seasons of 40-50 homers here.

But Davis was THAT GUY.  Davis was the guy that could go deep 45-50 times a year.  Those teams aren't as good or as fun without him.

I also think he was criminally underrated at first base, I think he should have had a Gold Glove or two.  Fight me.  I don't know or care what the defensive metrics say.  For a big man, he was very agile around the bag and was able to make good scoops and picks on low throws.  Go to the tape, pull up ANY Manny Machado highlight reel tape you want and you'll see Davis on the other end bailing him out on throws.  I'm not taking away anything from Manny but Davis was on the other end with some remarkable picks and stretches to make the out.

All of this to say is that...no matter how much grief we give him on here (and I'm near the front of the line, I freely admit it), I hope we don't forget the good times.  Because the good times were really good and really fun, fleeting as they were.  

)

Chris Davis didnt deserve a Gold Glove.  Watching Texeira during Davis prime years you could see Davis was not up to Gold Glove standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Davis not playing today had more to do with wanting to get Núñez in the game and not wanting Mancini in the outfield and less to do with the lhp starting. I expect Davis to be in the Lineup tomorrow against a lefty and probably will be more times than not. I will be pleasantly surprised however if he’s not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jrobb21613 said:

I think Davis not playing today had more to do with wanting to get Núñez in the game and not wanting Mancini in the outfield and less to do with the lhp starting. I expect Davis to be in the Lineup tomorrow against a lefty and probably will be more times than not. I will be pleasantly surprised however if he’s not.

giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51a5ca039426361396c45

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, atomic said:

Chris Davis didnt deserve a Gold Glove.  Watching Texeira during Davis prime years you could see Davis was not up to Gold Glove standards.

I disagree! Davis was adequate to above average in the field, arm like a cannon, and his picks at 1B were amazing. Finished third in GG voting, should have won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scOtt said:

Or a BAND NAME!

Of course, there was that drink named after him, the Orange Crush at some local bars. The Chris Davis Effect drink is where you pay for the drink and the bartender puts it on a shelf where it can’t be put into play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, jrobb21613 said:

I think Davis not playing today had more to do with wanting to get Núñez in the game and not wanting Mancini in the outfield and less to do with the lhp starting. I expect Davis to be in the Lineup tomorrow against a lefty and probably will be more times than not. I will be pleasantly surprised however if he’s not.

I'll bet you a million bazillion dollars Davis sits tomorrow too. Or only gets in for an AB late in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scOtt said:

I'll bet you a million bazillion dollars Davis sits tomorrow too. Or only gets in for an AB late in the game.

If I was still a gambling man I might take up on that bet but for just little less than a bazillion dollars. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think half of Fangraphs’ staff over the years came from Lookout Landing.   I rarely read other teams’ sites, but I agree Pinstripe Alley is one of the best Yankee sites.     
    • For one thing, they don’t have Bautista shutting things down in the 9th inning or extra innings.   Second, 30-16 just doesn’t happen every year.  I’m actually pretty encouraged that the O’s have played .650 baseball without winning a disproportionate number of close games.    
    • Four more shutout innings for Chace last night, 2 hits, 3 walks, 6 strikeouts.   His ERA is 0.91, WHiP 1.21, K/9 12.7.   The only blemish is his 5.2 BB/9.   He’s pitched 8 games and has only allowed runs in two of them.   Yesterday he threw 45 of 68 pitches for strikes.  For some reason the O’s kind of have him under wraps, as he’s only been allowed to exceed 70 pitches twice, back in April.  He’s also been kept to four inning outings.  They’re clearly being very careful with the 20-year old (turns 21 in three weeks).  In fairness, they did need to shut him down for a month late last summer, so I’m guessing it’s more season load management than game-by-game decisions.   In any event, it’s been a promising campaign for Chace.    
    • I mean, I don't want to denigrate your experience, but I think you're underestimating the power potential of elite athletes.  The leg strength required to send a grown man 20 mph from a dead stop is the same leg strength required to do a deadlift, or do a squat.  Can your buddy run a 4.5 40?
    • The Orioles were 30-16 in one-run games in 2023. They are 6-6 this year so far. Orioles magic hasn’t been there this year, at least so far. What changed?
    • I can’t even believe the grasping of straws going on here.  Why don’t we just bring up every guy at Norfolk who has an .800+ OPS, since they’re obviously better than their major league counterparts?  Oh wait, everyone at Norfolk has an .800+ OPS! As to Mullins, yes he’s looked awful at the plate for a month, but the O’s are nowhere near the point of regularly benching him or pinch hitting for him in key situations vs. RHP.   You know why?   Because even good players have slumps, and the best way to get them out of it is to keep playing them until they emerge from them.  And Mullins has a long enough track record where the odds of him coming out of this eventually are decent.  Not 100%, but a lot more likely than not.  I mean, the guy had an .859 OPS the first 3 weeks of the season.  That guy didn’t have some instantaneous physical decline that has turned him into the second coming of Chris Davis permanently.  I know it’s frustrating to watch him right now.  I’m as frustrated as anyone.   But every major league team would be doing what the Orioles have been doing, for another 4-6 weeks at a minimum.  
    • But it doesn't really matter if correlation implies causation, because we can at least infer that people with fast 40 times have a good chance of being able to squat 2.5x their body weight, regardless of whether there is a causative relationship.  And we have verifiable data thay many football players at skill positions are able to squat large amounts of weight that would be out of reach of many other people even given the same amount of training and diet.  So with both if these things in hand we can safely assume that these lifting numbers are achievable for most elite athletes, which Holliday qualifies as.  So I don't think we should be shocked or skeptical that he's able to pull these numbers.    I'd also be shocked if there wasn't a causative relationship between 40 times and lifting heavy.  Lifting large amounts of weight requires powerful muscles in the legs.  Running really fast also requires powerful muscles in the legs.  You can get in the weeds about muscle fiber type but to me if you're good at one, there's a great chance thay you're at least moderately good at the other.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...