Jump to content

Roberts to the Dodgertown?


Elon Os Fan

Recommended Posts

Kemp or Kershaw has to be in that package IMO for Angelos to sign off...

As a Dodgers fan, I would not move either one of those two straight up for Roberts. No disrespect to Roberts, but it is more about the salary/service time difference.

I view Kemp as a more advanced version of Adam Jones and I am sure with the way he is coming along that you would not part with him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply
As a Dodgers fan, I would not move either one of those two straight up for Roberts. No disrespect to Roberts, but it is more about the salary/service time difference.

I view Kemp as a more advanced version of Adam Jones and I am sure with the way he is coming along that you would not part with him!

MacPhail isn't going to Angelos with a Roberts deal unless Kemp or Kershaw is part of it IMO...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, it might even be a little more than LAN would part with, depending on what they see in Hu. McDonald is legit, and LaRoche (though not favored by LAN) still will have significant trade value.

This was my thinking too. We're wildly undervaluing MacDonald (who's numbers are beastly - in a good way). We're acting as Hu's lack of value is a foregone conclusion going forward (i.e., a throw-in) and that - just because the Dodgers have wavered on LaRoche's on-field value that they somehow are operating under the impression that he has zero trade value, too.

Look, I buy a Ferrari and for some reason don't like the way it drives, my leaving it in the driveway isn't going to diminish it's value. Now, if there are some issue with the suspension, that should be taken into account. But LaRoche is what he is. And everyone knows what kind of talent is there. The oly way the Dodgers' folly = lessened value is:

1. Folks don't have their own information and so rely on the Dodgers.

2. Folks don't trust their own information and so rely on the Dodgers.

Both of these are going to be true - to an extent - but hardly enough to drive down LaRoche's value like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't want Hu - Kemp, LaRoche, McDonald and DeJesus for Sherrill and Roberts...

No, we have to get back Utley and Hamels if we are trading Roberts. But maybe the Dodgers could use those pieces to get Utley and Hamels, then give them to us for Roberts! I hope so!

Joe Torre has had a smoldering love affair with Roberts ever since he first saw Roberts steal second faster than Torre could remove his finger from his nostril and point out the theft to Don Zimmer. He'll do all he can to convince the Dodgers management. And with Roberts' movie star looks, maybe Hollywood will help subsidize his contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind this is MacPhail we are talking about here and also convincing Angelos to part with Roberts...

I'm just pointing out what sort of deal I could see actually being accepted. If Angelos and LAN are that far apart, there's no potential deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, we have to get back Utley and Hamels if we are trading Roberts. But maybe the Dodgers could use those pieces to get Utley and Hamels, then give them to us for Roberts! I hope so!

Joe Torre has had a smoldering love affair with Roberts ever since he first saw Roberts steal second faster than Torre could remove his finger from his nostril and point out the theft to Don Zimmer. He'll do all he can to convince the Dodgers management. And with Roberts' movie star looks, maybe Hollywood will help subsidize his contract.

Come now. This shows like zero baseball knowledge. Everyone knows that Torre used Zimmer's finger to pick his nose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the Dodgers give up LaRoche and Kemp in the same trade.

Generally, I agree. But for Sherrill/Roberts it's at least concievable, especially if that's basically the entirety of what LAN is giving up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How any national league team could be interested in Manny is beyond me. Have they not scouted him? He is probably the worst defensive outfielder in the majors right now, he's 36, and he is unhappy with his contract. He sort of half gets by playing little league left field in Fenway, and every time he F's up or complains the Sox fans laugh it off as "Manny being Manny." Manny is ten times worse in the field than Aubrey Huff, and all the teams in the NL seem to think Huff is a DH. If I were in the pennant race right now I would not trade Aubrey Huff straight up for Manny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...