Jump to content

Will this weekend be the last time we see Chris Davis in Baltimore?


Sanfran327

Is this Chris Davis' Final Weekend as an Oriole?  

85 members have voted

  1. 1. Is this Chris Davis' Final Weekend as an Oriole?

    • Yes
      23
    • No
      62


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I got no problem with disagreements, hell, I dont agree with myself sometimes. :)

But, look at the stats, they are pretty bad, -1.6 WAR and Davis did a -1.4 this year.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/h/howarry01.shtml

There's a certain respectability that comes with a .690 or .720 OPS you just can't get when you're a first baseman with a .539.  You can convince some people that a .700 OPS, 20 homers and 80 RBI is okay in a way that you'll never do with a .168-16-49 line.  And Davis' '19 production is slightly better because his playing time and role has been more limited to protect him from things like left-handed pitching.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

I don't see how Ryan Mountcastle can get an opportunity in Baltimore as long as Chris Davis is still on the roster.  The O's have too many LF/1B/DH types even without Chris Davis, and Mountcastle has done more than enough to earn a shot.  I think this offseason is when they finally pull the trigger on Davis.  

Mancini 1B (until he is traded). Mountcastle DH (until Mancini is traded).

Davis can be on the roster without playing every day, even without the additional roster spot they'll have next year.

2019 is definitely not the last time we see Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

There's a certain respectability that comes with a .690 or .720 OPS you just can't get when you're a first baseman with a .539.  You can convince some people that a .700 OPS, 20 homers and 80 RBI is okay in a way that you'll never do with a .168-16-49 line.  And Davis' '19 production is slightly better because his playing time and role has been more limited to protect him from things like left-handed pitching.

OPS+

Howard: 91,115,92,96,85

Davis: 110,96,49,49.  With three seasons to go.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

Mancini 1B (until he is traded). Mountcastle DH (until Mancini is traded).

Davis can be on the roster without playing every day, even without the additional roster spot they'll have next year.

2019 is definitely not the last time we see Davis.

Why would you DH Mountcastle over Mancini?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You think other teams are going to fall for that?

Mancini seems to be able to handle DHing without an offensive dropoff.  He also isn't real good at first. 

I don't know that he's been given a fair shot. I'd like to see what he can do every day. Of course I would not be upset if they had a reason for flipping them. The point being, there is room on the roster for Davis. Protecting guys from the Rule 5 is a concern but I still don't see them getting rid of Davis just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

OPS+

Howard: 91,115,92,96,85

Davis: 110,96,49,49.  With three seasons to go.

 

Yep.  Howard was also a minus-first baseman.  Howard was never as bad offensively as Davis, but he was a -9 first baseman and a -2 baserunner.  This year Davis sits at +1 and 0. 

Davis is a little worse, but it's partially the perception.  No one really expects your first baseman to field or run well, but they should hit better than a Rule 5 shortstop.

And yes, three more years.  It would be an interesting science experiment.  Can you decline as a hitter from "crater" to "normal NL pitcher" if you start off as a real major league hitter?  I kind of think that Rafael Palmerio could out-hit Davis right now, at the age of 54.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Yep.  Howard was also a minus-first baseman.  Howard was never as bad offensively as Davis, but he was a -9 first baseman and a -2 baserunner.  This year Davis sits at +1 and 0. 

Davis is a little worse, but it's partially the perception.  No one really expects your first baseman to field or run well, but they should hit better than a Rule 5 shortstop.

It's a bad look if they don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

Mancini 1B (until he is traded). Mountcastle DH (until Mancini is traded).

Davis can be on the roster without playing every day, even without the additional roster spot they'll have next year.

2019 is definitely not the last time we see Davis.

In the 1800s teams would play with a 12- or 13-man roster, so it's possible to hide me or you on a 25-man roster and still have a semi-functional baseball team.

The question is whether it makes any sense to do that.  It doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't know that he's been given a fair shot. I'd like to see what he can do every day. Of course I would not be upset if they had a reason for flipping them. The point being, there is room on the roster for Davis. Protecting guys from the Rule 5 is a concern but I still don't see them getting rid of Davis just yet.

Mancini has not been given a fair shot at 1B, but that's not the issue now.  If Mancini is going to be traded it will be based on what he did this year not what he might do with playing time at 1B next year.

Mancini isn't going to be here as a DH very long if at all.  If Mountcastle is ready, he's going to be-  should be- played at 1B.  The only caveat would be that Mountcastle's 1B play is accepted as MLB ready and it's the hitting they are worried about.  That's legit.  Mancini has demonstrated MLB hitting ability and not been given 1B play.  His 1B play next year, if he's here, would be to evaluate Mountcastle's hitting exclusively. 

Leftovers.... Davis.  Time for the farewell party.  Thanks for everything.  We couldn't have done what we did in those runs at a Championship without you, but it's time to pack your things.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • After a really disappointing April that saw his ERA balloon to 7.78, Alex Pham has found his bearings in May, allowing 3 ER in 14.1 IP, allowing 8 hits and 4 walks while striking out 17.   Yesterday Pham allowed a run on 2 hits and a walk in 4.2 innings, striking out 7.   53 of 72 pitches were strikes.  The sole run charged to Pham scored when reliever Kyle Virbitsky allowed a 2-out double to the first batter he faced after relieving Pham in the fifth.    Due to the poor start, Pham’s ERA still rests at an unimpressive 5.29, but he’s definitely been headed in the right direction.  Also, he’s struck out 40 batters in 34 innings.     
    • I can’t emphasize enough how stupid that rain delay was.  No rain at all for 45 minutes, then two hours of light mist, the kind that teams play through all the time.  I was standing near the kids play area during most of the delay and believe me, that rain didn’t deter any kids from using the playground equipment for two hours. Then, 15 minutes before the game is going to start, the grounds crew is watering the infield.  What? The game itself was not worth the wait, needless to say.   But what annoys me most is the complete lack of communication during these delays.  How about letting the fans who are there know what the thinking is about how long the delay will be?  How about an update every 30 minutes or so.   Nope, nothing.   Just a generic message on the scoreboard saying that the start of the game will be delayed to to the “threat” of inclement weather.   My phone was showing .05” of rain expected in the next six hours.  Some threat! On the bright side, the team did announce that ticket holders would be given vouchers that could be used for a Monday - Thursday game.  That was the least they could do.       
    • 19,286 for that rain-delayed mess of a game.  I’d say about 2/3 of those stuck through the 3 hour delay and were in their seats at game time.  
    • And paid Scherzer, and Zimmerman, and Corbin, and Werth.   They didn’t all work out, but nobody could say the Nats didn’t spend to put a winning team on the field during their run.  The run basically ended because Stras II and Corbin blew up in their face.   But there’s always 2019.   
    • I can’t believe that 8 hours after Grayson stepped off the mound, I’m the first person to update his thread.   After a 19-day IL stint and without a rehab stint, Grayson threw 6 innings of one-hit shutout ball last night.  The one hit was an infield squibber hit 59.5 mph off the bat.  His command was a tad shaky at times, as he walked three and hit a batter, but he still breezed through 6 innings on 82 pitches, 50 for strikes.  If it hadn’t been his first outing in three weeks, he certainly could have pitched the 7th inning.  Unfortunately, the bullpen blew it for him. Fastball topped out at 98.4 and he was still hitting 97 in his final inning.  
    • I think half of Fangraphs’ staff over the years came from Lookout Landing.   I rarely read other teams’ sites, but I agree Pinstripe Alley is one of the best Yankee sites.     
    • For one thing, they don’t have Bautista shutting things down in the 9th inning or extra innings.   Second, 30-16 just doesn’t happen every year.  I’m actually pretty encouraged that the O’s have played .650 baseball without winning a disproportionate number of close games.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...