Jump to content

Fangraphs: Orioles’ Top 40


Frobby

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Pheasants said:

I was surprised to see McKenna ranked equally to Diaz and Hayes, especially the latter.  He doe not seem to get the same respect here.

Just speaking for myself, McKenna has to prove a lot to get on my radar. There were whispers last year that he wasn't following through on coaching, getting himself out on the basepaths a lot, etc. In addition to just a down year offensively. 

But I could also see him cracking the 26-man at some point this year if we need someone to play CF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

To give a sense of how tough Fangraph grades players and where the players will likely rank on Fangraphs Top 100+ when the list is finished, here is where the cutoffs for FV's were for their 2019 midseason list (that is, the lowest ranked player in each FV tier).

70 - #1

65-  #3

60- #14

55- #37

50- #106

The Orioles had 4 players with FVs of 50 or above: Adley Rutschman at 60, Grayson Rodriguez at 55, DL Hall and Ryan Mountcastle at 50.

 

Pretty comparable to the other top 100 lists we’ve seen.   Any idea how many 45’s there were?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

I’m happy to see Grenier at 19, but surprised since he is not listed in the OH’s Top 30. Is their ranking higher because of his draft position? Is the OH ranking undervaluing his defense?

 

22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I am going with Fangeaphs overvaluing his defense.

I know Luke always liked Hall's defense a bit better than Grenier's, but Fangraphs rates Hall 45/50 for fielding and 50/55 for throwing, while Grenier rates 50/55 and 60/60.    So yeah, they do like his defense.    Whether they overvalue it is TBD.    They also said this:

Quote

He was a swing-change candidate for pro ball and his hands do load a little differently now, coming toward his rising front knee before circling back around in a loop toward the ball. This is reminiscent of lots of Donaldsonesque swings implemented in the minors right now. If something clicks, Grenier could be an everyday shortstop. For now, the strikeouts push him toward a lesser, middle infield utility role.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

I found this interesting:

“Baltimore appears headed down the Houston scouting model pathway toward video and data-heavy analysis. They’ve fired some scouts and hired Scouting Analyst Consultants. “Consultant” titles in baseball don’t have to be included on org ledgers so a team can have a lot of them and other teams/general folks don’t always know about it. How Lunhow-y things get in Baltimore is officially up in the air after the namesake’s grizzly end in Houston. Part of the reason baseball’s collective disdain for Houston grew was because of the scout firings, so maybe Baltimore (and Milwaukee) won’t go that far.”

I believe Luke’s position is “Scouting Analyst Consultant.”

The word is “grisly”

Boy that made me laugh. If I had a nickel for every time I didn’t edit correctly…

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Frobby said:

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/top-40-prospects-baltimore-orioles/
 

I haven’t read it yet, but will note that Fangraphs does a blurb on every player with a 35+ grade, and having 40 of those is a very healthy number.    More comments later.   

But 35 is terrible.

Just checked again, 35 is “Emergency Callup”

I can’t see how that is anything to write home about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jerios55 said:

So a few quick notes:

From last year, DJ Stewart, Jean Carlos Encarnacion, Richie Martin, Branden Kline, Dillon Tate, Evan Phillips, Mattias Dietz, Jean Carmona and Luis Ortiz came off last years 31 players.  (My count: 5 due to graduating and 4 due to poor showing).

4 players increased their grades: Grayson (45 to 55), Baumann (35+ to 45), Bannon (35+ to 40) and Rom (35+ to 40)

9 players decreased their grades: Diaz (50 to 45), Kremer/Lowther/Akin (45 to 40+), Hanifee (40+ to 35+), Carroll/Knight/Sparks/Cumberland (40 to 35+)

9 players maintained their grade: DJ Hall, Mountcastle, Hays, McKenna, Adam Hall, Greiner, Pop, Harvey and Zebron

So 18 additions: Rutschman, Henderson, Stowers, Zimmerman, Bailey, Hernaiz, Bradish, Wells, Watson, Ortiz, Handley, Diplan, Rucker, Mattson, Peralta, Daschbach, Peek, Bautista

Several in last group were draft picks (including top 3 new guys 1,5,10) and several from Bundy trade, the 2 Rule V guys and at least 1 waiver claim (Diplan).  I don't know all the guys near the bottom, so add commentary to this last line if desired. 

Did you omit Sedlock?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pheasants said:

I was surprised to see McKenna ranked equally to Diaz and Hayes, especially the latter.  He doe not seem to get the same respect here.

Seems like they really like his speed and defense.   Interestingly, the tool grades are essentially identical to the OH grades. FG first, OH second:

Hit: 45/50, 40/45

Raw power: 45/45, 50/50

Game power: 30/35, 40/45

Speed: 70/70, 70/70

Field: 55/60, 55/60

Throw: 50/50, 50/50

FG likes his hit tool better than OH, OH likes his power more than FG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Pheasants said:

I was surprised to see McKenna ranked equally to Diaz and Hayes, especially the latter.  He doe not seem to get the same respect here.

Yeah, I have a big disagreement with rating McKenna anywhere near Hays or Diaz. While McKenna does have some tools to work with, besides 300 PAs in Frederick, what has he ever done on the field? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McKenna was also very good for 78 PA's in Glendale in the Arizona Fall League in 2018, with a .344/.474/.590 line, his line was .296/.374/.473 over his last 233 PA's at Delmarva in 2017.

From June 5th through the end of the season last year he had a .248/.338/.386 line in a league where the average line was .238/.311/.366 while he was more than 2 years younger than the average Eastern League player.

He has had his struggles with the bat but he has elite speed and plus defense at a premium position. He has higher upside than many players and if you value upside, ranking him above players with middle/back of the rotation ceilings makes sense.

Big year coming up for him this year, definitely one to watch.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...