Jump to content

Fangraphs: Orioles’ Top 40


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Here’s a nice summary of Fangraphs scouting grades on the tools of our top 40, that includes exit velocity data for hitters and spin rate data for pitchers.  

Pitchers: https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/the-board/2020-prospect-list/scouting-pitching?sort=-1,1&type=3&pg=0&team=bal

Hitters: https://www.fangraphs.com/prospects/the-board/2020-prospect-list/scouting-position?sort=-1,1&type=2&pg=0&team=bal

They also give the hitters separate grades for pitch selection and bat control, in addition to the usual tool grades.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

I'm sure this has been explained here before but why does a 22 year old RP with spin and command who's lowest rating is a 45 rate a only a 35+ FV?

Zach Peek RHP BAL
 
39
21.8  
45/45
 
50/50
45/50
45/55
2350 2700 89-93 95
35+

It hasn’t been explained here before.   But I think in general, I often see overall FV grades from Fangraphs that are lower than any of the tool grades.    Diaz is an example of this, and I’m sure there are others.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It hasn’t been explained here before.   But I think in general, I often see overall FV grades from Fangraphs that are lower than any of the tool grades.    Diaz is an example of this, and I’m sure there are others.

On the other hand you have Franco who is a FV 80 with FV scores of 80/60/60/60/55/60.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So by my count, Elias has acquired 15 35+ players since being hired. 
 

That’s really adding some depth. Come Aug 1st, that number could be 25ish with the draft, trades, and waiver claims. So almost an entire farm system, or at least better a farm system better than what he inherited. 
 

The two drafts obviously help a lot. 

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Frobby said:

I just noticed that Fangraphs has Cadyn Grenier’s run tool graded at 70/70.     Did I miss something?     I don’t remember hearing before that his speed was noteworthy at all.   

 

8 hours ago, Frobby said:

Eric Longenhagen picked out Michael Baumann and Adam Hall as guys who Gogo’s crack next year’s top 100 if things click.   https://blogs.fangraphs.com/picks-to-click-who-i-expect-to-make-the-2021-top-100/

Grenier, Hall, and Gunnar, just point out how hard it is to find a SS prospect. Elias said recently something along the lines that a top SS prospect is the most important part of a farm system. I think he we take SS Austin Martin, Vanderbilt if he’s there with our 2nd pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

 

Grenier, Hall, and Gunnar, just point out how hard it is to find a SS prospect. Elias said recently something along the lines that a top SS prospect is the most important part of a farm system. I think he we take SS Austin Martin, Vanderbilt if he’s there with our 2nd pick. 

If he was that focused on it he could have gone Witt 1-1 last draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If he was that focused on it he could have gone Witt 1-1 last draft.

That’s like saying you could have used your spare hour to mow the lawn, when you used your time to change your brake pads. If you have to do both, swapping the order you then in doesn’t solve the problem.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

 

Grenier, Hall, and Gunnar, just point out how hard it is to find a SS prospect. Elias said recently something along the lines that a top SS prospect is the most important part of a farm system. I think he we take SS Austin Martin, Vanderbilt if he’s there with our 2nd pick. 

I don’t recall the quote you are referring to, unless you are referring to this:

I got to Elias and said "I know baseball organizations are really large. But they all can't have everything. Is there one thing the O's organization doesn't have that you would like to have?" I thought that he would say some kind of physical training equipment, or some techie video device. He said "A good shortstop prospect."

https://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/index.php?/topic/37368-os-caravan-turf-valley-and-mike-elias/&tab=comments#comment-2564495

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

 

Grenier, Hall, and Gunnar, just point out how hard it is to find a SS prospect. Elias said recently something along the lines that a top SS prospect is the most important part of a farm system. I think he we take SS Austin Martin, Vanderbilt if he’s there with our 2nd pick. 

Remember that Martin hasn't played short in college. It appears he's more than capable but he hasn't done it yet. This spring will tell a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...