Jump to content

SI: MLBPA rejects 2020 draft proposal - UPDATE 5 round implemented


weams

Recommended Posts

Just now, Redskins Rick said:

 

Ok, fair enough, so my thought process was wrong.

But, the end result of this, town lose teams and jobs, and the owner get richer.

Im not saying the current MIL model doesnt need revamping or tweaking, to improve things.

But what is the prime motivation here for change?

 

If you had a business and you realized it was being run inefficiently would you just leave it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

If you had a business and you realized it was being run inefficiently would you just leave it? 

Some of the minor league teams are doing very well for themselves, I wonder how many of them are losing money?

I dont see the MIL as a for profit business which they are.

But, they are also in the development player business. So you have to invest time and energy into a prospect to give them a chance at the bigs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Redskins Rick said:

Some of the minor league teams are doing very well for themselves, I wonder how many of them are losing money?

I dont see the MIL as a for profit business which they are.

But, they are also in the development player business. So you have to invest time and energy into a prospect to give them a chance at the bigs.

 

You just sidestepped my question.

If you had a business and you realized that it was being run inefficiently would you just leave it?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You just sidestepped my question.

If you had a business and you realized that it was being run inefficiently would you just leave it?

 

No I wouldnt.

But, I think I explained that I dont recall the MIL as a business, just to turn a profit. Of course, only my opinion.

With the contraction of the MIL are they actually going to raise the income for the players which in some cases is below the poverty line?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

No I wouldnt.

But, I think I explained that I dont recall the MIL as a business, just to turn a profit. Of course, only my opinion.

With the contraction of the MIL are they actually going to raise the income for the players which in some cases is below the poverty line?

So you are holding MLB to a standard that you wouldn't hold yourself?  That seems irrational.

As for your question I do think that is in the works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So you are holding MLB to a standard that you wouldn't hold yourself?  That seems irrational.

As for your question I do think that is in the works. 

Its not irrational, to develop players into big leaguers.

Do all college turn a profit,  or are some supported by state budget and deep alumni pockets, as their mission is to develop young adults into future income earners?

I do not equate Bowie Baysox with Home Depot next door to their stadium.

Sorry, I just dont agree.

So that makes me irrational?

Lets just agree to disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Its not irrational, to develop players into big leaguers.

Do all college turn a profit,  or are some supported by state budget and deep alumni pockets, as their mission is to develop young adults into future income earners?

I do not equate Bowie Baysox with Home Depot next door to their stadium.

Sorry, I just dont agree.

So that makes me irrational?

Lets just agree to disagree.

Of course minor league baseball is a business.  And a particularly obvious one.  In the beginning there were minor league teams because owners liked baseball and wanted to make money. When that became a challenge they sold out to the majors, co-opting all affiliated minor league seasons for all time so that the MLB teams could have a source of inexpensive talent and the minor league owners could turn a profit. 

The minor leagues are the only sports leagues in the world that I know of that have completely given up on the idea of fielding legitimate and competitive teams and having competitive championship races because turning a profit was more important.

The idea that this construct should be held in the same regard as state-run universities and colleges is, at least to me, ludicrous.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Of course minor league baseball is a business.  And a particularly obvious one.  In the beginning there were minor league teams because owners liked baseball and wanted to make money. When that became a challenge they sold out to the majors, co-opting all affiliated minor league seasons for all time so that the MLB teams could have a source of inexpensive talent and the minor league owners could turn a profit. 

The minor leagues are the only sports leagues in the world that I know of that have completely given up on the idea of fielding legitimate and competitive teams and having competitive championship races because turning a profit was more important.

The idea that this construct should be held in the same regard as state-run universities and colleges is, at least to me, ludicrous.

I thought MIL teams gave up on fielding competitive teams at the MIL level and winning MIL playoff games was secondary, and their number 1 goal was player development.

A long time ago, a famous money man, cant remember who. Said if you want to make money, dont buy a sports team, while they make money, their goal is more entertainment, then trying to run a business to see how much you can squeeze out of it.

Oh well, I am in the minority with you all today.

But, I still respect your opinions.

363848-Just-Because-I-Disagree-With-You-

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I thought MIL teams gave up on fielding competitive teams at the MIL level and winning MIL playoff games was secondary, and their number 1 goal was player development.

A long time ago, a famous money man, cant remember who. Said if you want to make money, dont buy a sports team, while they make money, their goal is more entertainment, then trying to run a business to see how much you can squeeze out of it.

Oh well, I am in the minority with you all today.

But, I still respect your opinions.

363848-Just-Because-I-Disagree-With-You-

How about you check out franchise values?  Royals are the most recent team to be sold.  They sold for a billion.  The last time they were sold was 2000.  They sold for 96 million.

i think your famous money man isn't relevant today.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I thought MIL teams gave up on fielding competitive teams at the MIL level and winning MIL playoff games was secondary, and their number 1 goal was player development.

For 50+ years the only goals of a minor league owner was to field a good, competitive team and win championships and make money.

When many owners found making money to be a challenge, that coincided with MLB owners becoming disenchanted with paying market rates for minor league players.  So they worked out a deal: the MiLB owners would sell players to the MLBers at a set fee, whenever the MLB wanted, and whomever they wanted.  Over time that became the MLB team paying all minor league salaries, and having immediate access to any player they wanted.  And the minor league teams really didn't have to worry so much about turning a profit.

So by roughly 1960 there were no real minor league competitions any more, they were all in it for the good of the majors.  Even if that means Edmonton and Walla Walla exist solely to benefit a MLB team thousands of miles away with no organic connection to the area.  And Edmonton and Walla Walla have no control whatsoever on the quality or makeup of their team. And because players rarely spend even a full year at a level there is NO lasting connection between players and fans.

You can develop major league players without nuking the community nature of your local ballclub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Ultimately it is about money of course but I do think that they think the current minor league system is outmoded.  From a development standpoint do you think teams need as many teams as they currently have?  Are the younger kids better off playing in rookie league ball or working in camps the year they are drafted?

It’s hard to say if they need as many teams as they currently have.    It’s nice to be able to put players on development tracks that fit their needs.   The more levels there are, the easier it is to find the right time to promote a player.    Now is that a necessity?   Arguably not.    But does it lead to better development?   Arguably yes.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s hard to say if they need as many teams as they currently have.    It’s nice to be able to put players on development tracks that fit their needs.   The more levels there are, the easier it is to find the right time to promote a player.    Now is that a necessity?   Arguably not.    But does it lead to better development?   Arguably yes.   

It would be nice if the AL could run an alternate set up for a decade like with 2-3 levels of minors, and the NL the current one.  Then we could do a big study and compare who developed the best prospects.  Otherwise it's hard to tell.

Japan has one level of minors, so does Korea. Running short seasons.  Mexico has a small feeder league below their main league, every team doesn't have an affiliate.

At 18-19 Ichrio split the season between Orix and their Ni-Gun League affiliate.  It would be interesting to see how a contracted minor league system might influence things like free agency eligibility.  I think many really good players would be just as well off being part-time players in the majors at earlier ages than spending years riding buses around the minors.  But that never happens because of service time.  If everyone became a free agent at 28 and there was no expectation of winding his way through multiple levels of minors, Ryan Mountcastle would now have almost 1000 MLB plate appearances.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think you will lose the occasional player that would have had a nice ML career otherwise but we won't know so no one will miss them.

For the most part you will just be removing chaff. 

Right. The 26th round (or whatever) Mike Piazza. The LOTTO win. Otherwise chaff. Roster filler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

If you want to implement a swing change, or pitching delivery tweak it has to be a lot more difficult in game situations.  In a controlled environment they are getting instant feedback.

And now high speed cams and electronic gizmos!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • If they sit Kjerstad for a few days for what could have warranted a  concussion protocol, it would make sense to bring up Mayo. I've said many times, I don't expect the kid to rake right away, but he could be a spark, could be a momentum changer. We don't know unless we make the move. It may not happen, but this could be the situation that makes sense.
    • I've been called the  whiner,  the "reverse jinx" guy, the guy who sees the "dark cloud" behind the silver lining....you name it.  But I would like to say this. Yes, this team is struggling and yes this is a significant series and we might not snap out of it right away. But remember. This team is too talented, too energetic, too destined to be denied over the long haul. We are going to bust out...and soon. It might take a while but when we do, look out. There will be new personnel, perhaps some new pitchers and bullpen pieces...maybe they wont make a splash, but it will be an upgrade. Its coming. This team will have a very fine second half of the season. Our youth is showing a little bit, but over the long haul...this team will NOT be stopped. Not over the course of a season. I want to see this team playing with a swagger and confidence I've seen before. It will happen. It will be a hit, then another hit. Then it will be contagious and it will be exciting to watch. A long time ago, the Beatles' John Lennon used to ask his bandmates, "Where are we going fellas"? And Paul, Ringo, and George would chime in... "We're going to the topper most of the popper most , Johnny" That's what I'd like to say . WERE GOING TO THE "TOPPERMOST OF THE POPPERMOST".  We're gonna be "Fab" again. I promise. And I can't wait to get there with them. Who's with me?
    • Probably needs another thread but I think hitting a batter in the head should come with a suspension. A bunch of sports like NFL and Hockey have done things to protect players. I would feel the same way if Kimbrel hit a Yankee in the head too. There’s probably some data out there on the average time a concussed player misses time and base the first time suspension off. Then each one after that gets more severe. There is a way to throw inside and anything above the shoulders should be off limits.
    • Oh my god! The slide? The Orioles have three more wins this year than they did at this date last season. If you want to get technical, their record thru 94 game is identical to last season. Calm down. 
    • I get what you are saying but I still admit I surprised they have the early starts when school is out. I’m fine with them myself but you would think an additional half hour could convince someone to make the trek.     At the game tonight the empty seats filled in by about 730. I always thought years ago 730 starts made sense on Friday’s but I gave up on that idea. 
    • Goes without saying a split rest of way keeps Orioles up one game at break and also means they would be up 6-4 in season standings. Win both you clinch season series. Play at NYY 3 games with 6 games to go. Just avoid a damn sweep. I think the series is more important from a tiebreaker standpoint than necessarily being up or down a game.    Hopefully some frustration was released in the 9th inning. One big hit and maybe this team relaxes some.  
    • Brought this up in game thread. Send Povich down for an arm. Technically don’t need a 5th SP until SD series but based off how the Orioles like give guys an extra day they can start Irvin vs MIA.  Play a DH at home Mon July 30. Can call him back up then. Play 11 games before that DH. One start by Irvin vs MIA is worth an extra arm.    I know he needs to be added to the 40 but Mayo could come up for Kjerstad. Concussion IL is 7 days. You have 4 days off at the break. If not Mayo then obviously Stowers, it makes no sense to take any chances for losing Heston 3 games at most.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...