Jump to content

Marlins ( and now Phillies) season(s) on pause, O's to host Yankees on Wednesday and Thursday


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ORIOLE33 said:

Are they 100% positive that these conditions didn’t exist before they had COVID-19? 

I think Ed-Rod is pretty safe to say it wasnt there, as they do an pretty intense medical workup on all their patients.

My own heart doctor agreed that COVID can hurt the heart, thankfully, my current checkup compared to last years, with no changes.

He did say that the numbers of people impacted by COVID on their heart,  was not near the amount that social media was portraying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, orioles119 said:

Exactly... in a world where a player can throw out their shoulder just by washing their truck, then there are risks.  There are risks in everything you do in life.

Except with this, when one player throws out his shoulder washing his truck, 7 other teammates don't simultaneously throw out their shoulders with him.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, waroriole said:

A lot of questions about why the game wasn’t cancelled yesterday with 4 Marlins testing positive. Probably because MLB has no protocols in place for this. 

This.  I saw a snippet from an article from The Athletic that someone posted on another forum, and it's not a good optic for the Marlins and MLB that they played the game yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, waroriole said:

A lot of questions about why the game wasn’t cancelled yesterday with 4 Marlins testing positive. Probably because MLB has no protocols in place for this. 

Clearly the protocol is for a 31 year-old shortstop with a career .671 OPS to make the call whether to cancel the game based on group text conversations with his teammates and a consensus that they want to "play hard". The system worked.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Clearly the protocol is for a 31 year-old shortstop with a career .671 OPS to make the call whether to cancel the game based on group text conversations with his teammates and a consensus that they want to "play hard". The system worked.

I think I’m missing something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

Every time an athlete steps on the field there is risk involved.  Whether or not it is "worth it" is very difficult to define.

From my perspective as a fan and an outsider, there are only two options in which the reward  might be worth the risk: (a) not having a 2020 season, and (b) trying to have a 2020 season in which every safeguard that doesn't interfere with the playing of the game itself is put in place and enforced. My own preference would have been the second option, but it may be too late for that. In any other scenario, I don't think the reward is likely to be worth the risk of illness not only to players but also to managers, coaches, trainers, and family members -- in part because it looks like the reward is not likely to be the playing out of a 60-game schedule with playoffs. The boat just left the dock, and it's already sprung a pretty big leak. It's time for some repairs, not to proceed full speed ahead. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

I agree. I am not advocating that we continue. In the poll that was taken recently I suggested that we would not start up again at all.

The point is that if you’re going to start up you’ve got to have a reasonable process in place and it is very obvious that the greatest minds in baseball couldn’t come up with something that wasn’t a complete fiasco.

I doubt there are any greatest minds, in the current MLB front office or Ownership reps, or the players association.

Remember, they couldnt even agree on how to start the season, without a whole lot of drama involved.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • It’s my understanding that nationally televised games are usually blacked out. Consider a free trial subscription of Fubo if they are still offering it. 
    • The Orioles starters absolutely have to do better against the Royals. You can't ask this bullpen to pitch most of the game and expect to win. Right now I probably trust Coulombe the most and Soto (which I never would have guessed a couple weeks back). Perez has been really shaky recently to the point I'm wondering is he nursing a tired arm or minor injuey. Cano hasn't been good as well and O's really need him to get back into a groove. And Akin is usually trustworthy, but only starting the inning clean.
    • I'll be working at Gate F.  If you're getting drunk at Pickles before the game and then walk through the closest gate, you'll walk right past me.
    • What happens if it rains all day?
    • For me, bullpen strategy in a short series is developing a core principle or two and working backwards from that. That’s usually going to involve how we want to pitch to their best guys. In this case, there’s really no way to game Witt. He doesn’t have any discernible platoon splits, and in fact he destroyed RHPs this year. He doesn’t even have any particular pitches he struggles against. If you have to pitch to him, power stuff seems to be the way to go — if he has any weakness, it seems like maybe it’s LHPs who can attack him with high velocity and some sort of off speed weapon (Skubal, Framber, Kikuchi, EdRod, Rodon, Sale, Gore). So maybe you’re looking at Soto and Perez there, although you really just shouldn’t be pitching to him at all if you can avoid it. Beyond him, the other “hero” is Salvador Perez. And that’s from where I’d be building out my strategy. He probably should not see a LHP all series. There’s a fairly meaningful career platoon split there (109 wRC+ to 101), and it’s been more pronounced this year (130 to 110). I would be looking to force feed him ABs against Cano (1/4 with a single), Webb (0/2 with two Ks), and Dominguez. He’s always had trouble with offspeed stuff, which means Webb might be the preferred option. They’ve faced a ton of LH starters in the last week or so, but it seems like their preferred lineup against RHPs stacks LH hitters like Melendez and Gurriel behind Perez. Melendez is awful against LHPs, so ideally Perez might be the last hitter that the starters see. They pinch hit very liberally in platoon fashion in the bottom half of the lineup, so if you brought in someone like Akin behind the starter, they might very well hit for him. Forcing them to do that erases a lot of the platoon stacking in the late innings, so you could subsequently bring in a RHP to pitch to Perez without the same concern that they’d be exposed after him.    In sum, I think the ideal attack plan is for Burnes/Eflin/Kremer to see Perez three times, then bring in Akin or Cionel to pitch to the bottom of what will likely be a lefty-heavy lineup. They’ll potentially PH there, but that’s okay because none of those guys are that good. You then go to one of the RHPs for the top of the lineup, which it seems will consist of Pham, Witt (pitch around), and Perez. Then back to Coulombe or Soto for the bottom of the lineup again.
    • I have two tickets to Game 1 of the WC which I cannot use due to work travel.  Section 352, row 4, seats 9 & 10.  Asking $70 total for the two.  Paid $205 to the Orioles as a season plan member.   PM me if interested.  Paypal preferred.    
    • Can't make game 1. I'll be at game 2...last time I was at a playoff game at Camden, we beat Scherzer and the Tigers.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...