Jump to content

Where do Adley and Gunnar start the season in 2021?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Yes but the note from the article that Frobby pointed out was Henderson talking about Adley and the comment was made that he was impossible to get out..OriolesMagic noted that was good to hear since he sucked last year.

Sucked is a bit harsh, but he really struggled at the plate in his minor league debut.  Let's let him have some minor league success before he makes it to the majors.  I believe Elias will be much more patient with his promotion than most O's fans.  I will be surprised to see him in Baltimore before next September. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Sucked is a bit harsh, but he really struggled at the plate in his minor league debut.  Let's let him have some minor league success before he makes it to the majors.  I believe Elias will be much more patient with his promotion than most O's fans.  I will be surprised to see him in Baltimore before next September. 

I think we all need to remember that he was dealing with weather in Florida, being shuffled from affiliate to affiliate and was recovering from Mono.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think we all need to remember that he was dealing with weather in Florida, being shuffled from affiliate to affiliate and was recovering from Mono.

I hate the mono excuse.  He was much better early on than when he moved to Delmarva.  If he was recovering from mono, wouldn’t the struggles have been worse early on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I hate the mono excuse.  He was much better early on than when he moved to Delmarva.  If he was recovering from mono, wouldn’t the struggles have been worse early on?

Never had it so can't comment on what recovery is like.  I listed it as one of a number of factors, to which small sample size could be added. 

I think that whatever he did in Bowie, and college, should hold a lot more weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Never had it so can't comment on what recovery is like.  I listed it as one of a number of factors, to which small sample size could be added. 

I think that whatever he did in Bowie, and college, should hold a lot more weight.

I’m fine with all of this.  I’m just saying I hate it when people bring that up as why he didn’t hit in Delmarva.

He just didn’t perform well but it was a SSS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m fine with all of this.  I’m just saying I hate it when people bring that up as why he didn’t hit in Delmarva.

He just didn’t perform well but it was a SSS.

/shrug.  I've heard mono can have a long recovery period that varies with the individual.  It seems realistic to me that it still could have been having an impact on his performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

/shrug.  I've heard mono can have a long recovery period that varies with the individual.  It seems realistic to me that it still could have been having an impact on his performance.

Ok but then why didn’t it impact him in Aberdeen?  He had an OPS just under 900 in 77 at bats, easily the most at bats at any stop last year.

Now, I guess you could argue that it did effect him because even an 894 OPS at Aberdeen seems light but still, that’s a far better performance than Delmarva.

Bur again, the sample sizes are small, so you can’t really take anything away from them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

Why?  Looking at the way Elias has handled Mountcastle and now Diaz. A late season promotion in 2021 for a highly rated position player seems unlikely to me.   If the team is in contention in August then maybe they would do what happened to Manny but failing a surprise playoff year  I don't expect to see AR in 2021 at the major league level.

1.   I agree that Rutschman is unlikely to get called up in 2021.   Like you, I do not expect it.    What I said was that I wouldn’t rule it out.   

2.   If we buy into even half the hype, Rutschman > Mountcastle + Diaz combined.   He has to prove that on the field.  If he does that in a very clear way next year, I could see him getting called up.   Not likely, but possible.   

3.   I have zero problem with how the O’s handled Mountcastle or Diaz, and I doubt I’ll have a problem with how they handle Rutschman.   But I’d love to see him truly dominate and make it very hard for them to justify keeping him down.    In my opinion, Diaz really hasn’t made that strong a case, and though Mountcastle did make the case with his bat, there were enough holes in his game (plate discipline and defense) to make a plausible case for polishing him up a bit before calling him up.   Did service time also play a role?   I’ll say probably yes, but I don’t think his case for an earlier call-up was irrefutable.   I’d like to see Rutschman make that case.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Ok but then why didn’t it impact him in Aberdeen?  

Maybe because the level of talent in the New York Penn League was so low that even a player of his caliber recovering from being sick could still dominate.  Maybe the number of at bats at both stops were so small that they have no predictive power whatsoever.  Maybe because the only goal for last year was to acclimate him to pro ball and the stats were irrelevant.  Maybe it doesn't matter at all and some are making something out of nothing.  Maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

Maybe because the level of talent in the New York Penn League was so low that even a player of his caliber recovering from being sick could still dominate.  Maybe the number of at bats at both stops were so small that they have no predictive power whatsoever.  Maybe because the only goal for last year was to acclimate him to pro ball and the stats were irrelevant.  Maybe it doesn't matter at all and some are making something out of nothing.  Maybe.

A lot of things I don’t buy as good excuses.

First of all, I have said several times that the sample size makes this almost meaningless.

second of all, the first thing you said is right..talent level.  It was just harder in Delmarva except he should have easily been able to overcome that.  Again, sample size is so small that whatever but if he went down there and OPs’ed 1200, people wouldn’t be talking about mono or anything else.  The hype machine would be greater.  Instead, he struggled and people make excuses.

I hate the acclimation argument too because plenty of guys play minor league ball right after being drafted and are fine.  We even saw at least one player playing in October after being drafted in June this year.  He is an advanced college player.  Acclimation should be there.

I do agree that it likely doesn’t matter at all but that doesn’t mean people aren’t allowed to discuss it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

A lot of things I don’t buy as good excuses.

First of all, I have said several times that the sample size makes this almost meaningless.

second of all, the first thing you said is right..talent level.  It was just harder in Delmarva except he should have easily been able to overcome that.  Again, sample size is so small that whatever but if he went down there and OPs’ed 1200, people wouldn’t be talking about mono or anything else.  The hype machine would be greater.  Instead, he struggled and people make excuses.

I hate the acclimation argument too because plenty of guys play minor league ball right after being drafted and are fine.  We even saw at least one player playing in October after being drafted in June this year.  He is an advanced college player.  Acclimation should be there.

I do agree that it likely doesn’t matter at all but that doesn’t mean people aren’t allowed to discuss it.

Three different levels?  Three different cities?  Three different set of pitchers?  Three different sets of coaches?  In such an abbreviated period of time?

I can see it wearing a player down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

...but if he went down there and OPs’ed 1200, people wouldn’t be talking about mono or anything else.  The hype machine would be greater.  Instead, he struggled and people make excuses.

And those people would be wrong, too.  I just don't think that anything anybody does in that small number of at bats at those levels means anything at all, whether it was good or bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Three different levels?  Three different cities?  Three different set of pitchers?  Three different sets of coaches?  In such an abbreviated period of time?

I can see it wearing a player down.

I think this is a bit of a stretch.  I think it’s searching for excuses.  Why can’t it simply be he struggled in a very SSS against the best competition he has ever faced and leave it at that?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NCRaven said:

And those people would be wrong, too.  I just don't think that anything anybody does in that small number of at bats at those levels means anything at all, whether it was good or bad.

Ultimately, I don’t disagree with this.  Just enough of the excuses, that’s all I’m saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...