Jump to content

Who are the 2020 #1 and #2 Prospects?


Tony-OH

Who are the 2020 #1 and #2 Prospects?  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are the 2020 #1 and #2 Prospects?

    • Rutschman and Hall
      4
    • Rutschman and Gunnar Henderson
      0
    • Rutschman and Kjerstad
      1
    • Rutschman and Mountcastle
      7
    • Rutschman and Rodriguez
      38

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

Just now, Frobby said:

His offensive flaws are less than I thought.    He’s not much of a defender.    He’s still got time to improve on his weaknesses.   I’m pretty happy with how he’s working out so far.   

I think pitching is more valuable than anything else, so Hall should be 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There cant be any other answer than rutschman and mountcastle. Had to go back and make sure he was still a prospect but with only 126 at bats inthe Mlb Ryan should be considered one of the favorites next year for ROY. Rutschman is the top catching and top 5 prospect in baseball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Kjerstad should be ranked higher than Mountcastle imo.  He has a higher ceiling although you can argue that with no time playing, you “penalize him” for that on lists like this.  
 

 

Yes but on the other hand, MC is already in the show, showing what he can and can’t do. He’s much less Future potential and much more Present performance. Heston is all potential. I think you have to put him first ATM, and I guess Akin and Kremer at also prospects and they probably need to be top 6-7 as well.

hmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I think the trickiest question is where to place Kjerstad.   I cannot put him above Grayson without having played a MiL game.   But he’s got a credible argument for the no. 3 spot, even if you view him as more like the 7th/9th best talent in the draft rather than the 2nd best.   

Is Mountcastle Akin and Kremer all retain prospect status, they all have to be ahead of Kjersted, don’t they? Prospect is all about potential and Heston hasn’t faced a professional pitch, and the others have all had professional success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Philip said:

Is Mountcastle Akin and Kremer all retain prospect status, they all have to be ahead of Kjersted, don’t they? Prospect is all about potential and Heston hasn’t faced a professional pitch, and the others have all had professional success. 

No way..those guys don’t have the upside or potential of Kjerstad.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No way..those guys don’t have the upside or potential of Kjerstad.  

But they are already performing as major leaguers and doing well?

Merely making it to the majors doesn’t necessarily move someone up the prospect list, some guys show up and play lousy. But despite his defense, MC has done well, and Akin and Kremer have been quite good. That has to count for something especially when Kjersted hasn’t done a thing yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see where these guys are in a year.  

If we had taken Austin Martin with our pick, I think a legit case can be made for Martin to be ranked ahead of GrayRod.  Here we have our FO and analytics guys saying Kjerstad is every bit the hitting prospect that Martin is -- if not a better one.  On MLB.com, Martin is rated 16th overall and GrayRod 31.  Kjerstad comes in at 55.  If Kjerstad knocks the cover off the ball at two levels of A ball next year and enters 2022 at AA and a top 25 prospect, I think a case can be made that Kjerstad could be ahead of GrayRod.

Just saying.  For now, I expect this list should have AR at 1 and GrayRod at 2.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the draft, I took some time and watched video of Kjerstad over the past three seasons. His growth and maturation as a hitter was evident to me. He also became much more athletic in the past two years. He is a solid defender, and should perhaps be a tick above average in a corner OF spot. LH 60 power is not a common tool, especially one who has an 60 hit tool. I believe in the 2020 video I saw. I believe the adjustments he made mechanically and in his approach are legitimate. The hands are tremendous. 

So, as I said a week after the draft, I believe it is Adley and Heston at #1 and #2. That is no indictment of Grayson Rodriguez. I saw him pitch in the summer before his senior year and could see great potential, but he made serious improvement in a short time. He has worked very hard and it shows. That said, I generally would value an everyday middle of the order bat over a pitcher. Pitchers break all too often. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...