Jump to content

Who are the #5 and #6 Prospects?


Tony-OH

Who are the #5 and #6 Prospects?  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Who are the #5 and #6 Prospects?

    • Baumann and Hall
    • Hall and Baumann
    • Hall and Henderson
    • Henderson and Hall
    • Henderson and Baumann

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

I guess I wouldn't be totally shocked if Henderson made it here. The reports on him from Bowie were very nice. I'm sure Tony heard more. On the other hand, Baumann got shut down for an injury I don't know enough about. 

That said, Baumann had helium before being shut down. Power arm that really made positive steps last year. I have Hall at 5 and Baumann at 6. Not sure where Henderson fits in. If not here, I assume he's next, but could imagine a case for a guy like Kremer based on his ML success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diaz isn't even an option? That's who I would have thought would be here.

It's got to be Hall and Henderson then. Since both are really far away from the majors, you can't make a "more ready, more proven" argument here, so I think Hall is #5 based on his ceiling and Henderson is #6

Could have seen the argument for Baumann if he didn't just go down with a flexor mass strain. That's a really bad sign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, cnmilton said:

With Tony earlier stating that DL Hall struggles with both command and control, I am thinking the Baumann has surpassed Hall on the Hangout prospects list. I also think Gunnar has moved higher on the list.  Baumann and Henderson is my guess.

I was thinking that as well. Did Baumann or Zimmerman have the AA no hitter? I thought it was Zimmerman,  but he’s nowhere to be seen yet, and his debut was kind of meh.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to choose against Baumann because of his injury. Hall has control problems and those are really tough to fix, but he still has TOR potential, so I can’t see him falling far yet. Henderson is just a kid. Is he even 20 yet? But he’s the option, so he gets it. Hall- Henderson... and Harry..

:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suddenly DL Hall is like Aaron Rodgers in the green room on draft night.

Baumann's great unknowable kind of raises the question of how to factor possible injury into prospect lists.  I do feel like Bowie Baumann 2019 did a lot to pitch away from the Kremer/Akin peloton up towards the lead pack, and would love to see a Hall head to head evaluation in a fair fight.  Alas TINSTAAPP - just hopes for good results when throwing in earnest commences next spring.

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Diaz isn't even an option? That's who I would have thought would be here.

It's got to be Hall and Henderson then. Since both are really far away from the majors, you can't make a "more ready, more proven" argument here, so I think Hall is #5 based on his ceiling and Henderson is #6

Could have seen the argument for Baumann if he didn't just go down with a flexor mass strain. That's a really bad sign

Diaz should already be in the majors, right @Can_of_corn ? ☺️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll go Hall then Henderson.   Reports about Hall’s wildness concern me, but he’s still got a TOR repertoire and is young and athletic enough to overcome the control issues.    Plenty of risk there, but enough upside to leave him at 5.    Henderson drew raves from Matt Blood and others based on his Bowie performance, and Eric-OH’s reports during spring training also were glowing.    So, I’m putting him at 6 even though Baumann is also a very strong candidate for that spot.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I will say this without giving this away. From 5-7, I could have put them in any order and been able to build a solid case for that order. 

I think this is sad.   So DL Hall will fall from 3 to 5-7.   The O's rebuild depends on the O's developing front of the rotation starters.   Hall falling does not bode well for the rebuild IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...