Jump to content

A look at 35 international amateurs who debuted from 2013-19


Frobby

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Wonder how many players signed for 7 figures over this time frame?

Lots.   To be clear, the players who debuted in 2013-19 mostly were signed in 2008-14, with a couple of outliers.    The 2014 class in particular had a lot of high priced players who did not pan out.   Here’s a good article about that class.   https://www.google.com/amp/s/prospects365.com/2020/03/30/the-cautionary-tale-of-the-2014-international-signing-class/amp/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Lots.   To be clear, the players who debuted in 2013-19 mostly were signed in 2008-14, with a couple of outliers.    The 2014 class in particular had a lot of high priced players who did not pan out.   Here’s a good article about that class.   https://www.google.com/amp/s/prospects365.com/2020/03/30/the-cautionary-tale-of-the-2014-international-signing-class/amp/

Good reasons not to get wrapped up in the 7 figure signing bonuses. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great work as always!

I am curious to see what impact the new technology (track man, etc...) deployed down there and the increased tournament/showcase events will have on the accuracy of evaluations and success rates of teams signings. Things have changed tremendously in the past 5-6 years in how players are measured and evaluated. 

Also, teams have put much more into infrastructure and player development internationally. They have revamped the nutritional intake of players and the strength and conditioning programs. They have made a much greater effort to educate the players in many facets of life in the US, including teaching them English. All of these initiatives may help the success rate of international signings and help the teams spend money more wisely. It’s one theory anyway.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jammer7 said:

Great work as always!

I am curious to see what impact the new technology (track man, etc...) deployed down there and the increased tournament/showcase events will have on the accuracy of evaluations and success rates of teams signings. Things have changed tremendously in the past 5-6 years in how players are measured and evaluated. 

Also, teams have put much more into infrastructure and player development internationally. They have revamped the nutritional intake of players and the strength and conditioning programs. They have made a much greater effort to educate the players in many facets of life in the US, including teaching them English. All of these initiatives may help the success rate of international signings and help the teams spend money more wisely. It’s one theory anyway.

Agree this will be interesting.   As I said, the players I examined were mostly signed between 2008-14.    The system changed during that time, and since.    The soft cap was enacted in 2012 and the current hard cap became effective in 2017.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Wonder how many players signed for 7 figures over this time frame?

Definitely need the denominator for context.  For example, the 2013 draft's first round has seen about 2/3rds of players generate less than two wins in the majors.  And nearly half below replacement level or never made the majors.  The 2012 3rd round has seen one player get to five wins for his career.  2011 2nd round has four players get to five wins.

How do amateur free agents at different price points compare?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Agree this will be interesting.   As I said, the players I examined were mostly signed between 2008-14.    The system changed during that time, and since.    The soft cap was enacted in 2012 and the current hard cap became effective in 2017.    

Does anyone know of the caps' impact on overall spending?  Was there more spent overall (after inflation) in 2011 than in 2015?  Or 2019?  Eventually a decrease in compensation should lead to a decrease in talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Agree this will be interesting.   As I said, the players I examined were mostly signed between 2008-14.    The system changed during that time, and since.    The soft cap was enacted in 2012 and the current hard cap became effective in 2017.    

Nice information Frobby.....Thanks 

Im sure it is impossible to track but it would be interesting to see the success percentages of each category.

Im sure they throw money at any DR kid that shows any kind of tools. So they are low dollar figures but essentially money flushed down the toilet. 
 

Im disappointed that the Orioles never made a run at the pedigree type guys like Tatis or Guerrero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Does anyone know of the caps' impact on overall spending?  Was there more spent overall (after inflation) in 2011 than in 2015?  Or 2019?  Eventually a decrease in compensation should lead to a decrease in talent.

I think the huge signing bonuses handed out to Cuban players might skew the results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think the huge signing bonuses handed out to Cuban players might skew the results.

I think they're more regular free agents than amateurs so you could reasonably exclude them from the study.

Also, it's a wrong decision to treat someone who's played at a high(ish) level in Cuba or especially Japan and is 24, 25, 26 years old, and treat them like MLB rookies.  Clearly just for cost-control, not for any logical quality of play or experience reasons.  That and the typical "MLB is the only real baseball" attitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...