Jump to content

Angels clubhouse guy, ball doctoring


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/30671790/fired-los-angeles-angels-clubhouse-attendant-names-pitchers-ball-doctoring-case

Let me get this straight...

The Angels clubhouse guy has been serving up a rosin/pine tar substance for visiting pitchers for YEARS?  And it's considered a courtesy?  I would be ****ing IRATE if the Orioles were doing this for visiting opponents.

BTW, @Frobby, it lists Bundy as a guy who's been using this stuff.  So there ya go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I'm understanding this situation correctly, it sure does seem like the guy is being made a scapegoat and lost his job unfairly.  It's not like the guy was only providing his concoction to the Angels.  The use seems to be league-wide, and certainly wasn't much of a secret.  Seems like if MLB wanted the practiced stopped, just so order and move on, business as usual.  No reason this guy had to lose his job, IMO.  

One concern I have is that if the substance resulted in higher spin rates, I wonder if the young pitchers that the Orioles have accumulated that have shown high spin rates were benefitting from using this substance, or one like it.  If the estimate of 75% of MLB pitchers using the substance is accurate, I wonder how much this crack down on its use is going to affect the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

The substance does improve spin rate.

Quote

Lindbergh and Sarris note the correlation between the usage of a grip-altering foreign substance and higher spin rates for pitchers. (Both pieces are worth a full read for those interested). This figures to remain a topic of discussion for Major League Baseball, whether or not Harkins’ specific allegations are sufficient to warrant the continuation of his lawsuit.

Former Angels Staffer Alleges Widespread Use Of Foreign Substances - MLB Trade Rumors

I have zero knowledge on the subject.  Just going by what the article says.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Everyone cheats.  It’s a matter of who gets caught.  

Yep, which is why I find all the outrage pointed at the steroid users and Astros so baffling.  Ruth tried a steroid precursor and Hornsby wrote an article about cheating.  It's always been a part of the game and the game only does something about it when forced to by the fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...