Jump to content

Why "No DH" Sucks (last night)


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'll be the first to admit I'm an extreme proponent of the DH and believe universal DH is the way baseball should go.

Last night was the perfect example as to why NL baseball sucks. 

In the top of the 1st inning, Miami starter Nick Neidert was on the ropes. He had allowed three runs already after walking Galvis on 4 straight pitches, he had runners on 1st and 2nd with two outs and the 8th hitter Sisco at the plate. With Matt Harvey on deck, what does Neidart do to get out of the jam? He hits Sisco with a slider on his foot that he pulled about two feet. The pitch looked like an obvious way to use one pitch to load the bases in order to get to the pitcher.

Harvey then grounds out weakly to the pitcher and the threat is over. 

The walking, pitching around, and hitting of 8th batters to get to the pitchers with two outs is one of worse parts of baseball. 

Every single professional, college and high school leagues allow for the DH.

It's time for Universal DH. I much rather see a Renato Nunez type bat instead of a woeful pitcher.

If baseball is going insist on interleague, it's time to use the same rules and don't go with this crap they are trying in one of the minors leagues where a team can use a DH until the starting pitcher comes out. If they do that then then need to expand the rosters to 28 and allow for more PHers because again, watching a pitcher hit is not fun except for the rare occasion they actually come through.

 

Couldn't you just give him an IBB without throwing any pitches?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony, I agree with your overall premise but I don't think Neidert intentionally plunked Sisco with that pitch.  With the new intentional walk rule, he'd just have to signal that he'd want to put Sisco on base and that'd be it.

But yeah, last night I felt like we could have tacked on more runs in the first inning if Harvey wasn't batting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

People that like watching pitchers hit get their minds blown when you explain that there's just as much strategy involved with a DH. 

There’s probably more but yea, they have this belief that you need to be a master in the theory of relativity to understand the strategy of NL baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

People that like watching pitchers hit get their minds blown when you explain that there's just as much strategy involved with a DH.  

It has been argues that there is far more strategy to be considered when using the DH because so many moves are automatic when pitchers are in the batting order.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scOtt said:

I'd rather see Chris Davis bat than a pitcher.

Not kidding.

This one is borderline for me. Which pitcher are we talking about? I think I'd rather see Bumgarner, Carpenter, or Greinke hit. I'd rather watch Colon hit for the entertainment value, but compared to your run of the mill, everyday pitcher, it's probably a slight edge to Davis and I'd rather not watch Davis hit ever again so I guess that says something about how I feel about pitchers hitting. 

Personally, though, I would like to be able to designated the pitcher as the DH (and thus being two positions rather than forgoing the DH to allow the P to hit). It's a rare use case, but wouldn't mind enabling the Ohtani (and any other player that is two-way...if any exist ever again) to do both in a game but not hindering the team for doing it by making relievers hit since a DH is waved. This way Ohtani is the P and the DH, when he's removed from the game as a P, he can still hit (or another player can come in as the DH without losing the DH spot). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jamalshw said:

This one is borderline for me. Which pitcher are we talking about? I think I'd rather see Bumgarner, Carpenter, or Greinke hit. I'd rather watch Colon hit for the entertainment value, but compared to your run of the mill, everyday pitcher, it's probably a slight edge to Davis and I'd rather not watch Davis hit ever again so I guess that says something about how I feel about pitchers hitting. 

Personally, though, I would like to be able to designated the pitcher as the DH (and thus being two positions rather than forgoing the DH to allow the P to hit). It's a rare use case, but wouldn't mind enabling the Ohtani (and any other player that is two-way...if any exist ever again) to do both in a game but not hindering the team for doing it by making relievers hit since a DH is waved. This way Ohtani is the P and the DH, when he's removed from the game as a P, he can still hit (or another player can come in as the DH without losing the DH spot). 

Brendan McKay is a thing, but he hasn't played this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I'll be the first to admit I'm an extreme proponent of the DH and believe universal DH is the way baseball should go.

Last night was the perfect example as to why NL baseball sucks. 

In the top of the 1st inning, Miami starter Nick Neidert was on the ropes. He had allowed three runs already after walking Galvis on 4 straight pitches, he had runners on 1st and 2nd with two outs and the 8th hitter Sisco at the plate. With Matt Harvey on deck, what does Neidart do to get out of the jam? He hits Sisco with a slider on his foot that he pulled about two feet. The pitch looked like an obvious way to use one pitch to load the bases in order to get to the pitcher.

Harvey then grounds out weakly to the pitcher and the threat is over. 

The walking, pitching around, and hitting of 8th batters to get to the pitchers with two outs is one of worse parts of baseball. 

Every single professional, college and high school leagues allow for the DH.

It's time for Universal DH. I much rather see a Renato Nunez type bat instead of a woeful pitcher.

If baseball is going insist on interleague, it's time to use the same rules and don't go with this crap they are trying in one of the minors leagues where a team can use a DH until the starting pitcher comes out. If they do that then then need to expand the rosters to 28 and allow for more PHers because again, watching a pitcher hit is not fun except for the rare occasion they actually come through.

 

Nah what the strategy adds is worth what bad pitchers hitting subtracts.

But it is an old argument, and one either likes it or one doesn’t.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...