Jump to content

Elias and Hyde have to go


Patrick Mack

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You’re assuming he’s tried to build one.  But exactly how many times did we not have a below average bullpen between 1998-2011?
 

It's HARD to find a good SS without spending significant assets.  It is comparatively easy to find a BP arm without spending significant assets.

I think they could have done better in the last two years or so of rooting through that waiver wire, rule 5, etc, to get a few better arms.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

It's HARD to find a good SS without spending significant assets.  It is comparatively easy to find a BP arm without spending significant assets.

I think they could have done better in the last two years or so of rooting through that waiver wire, rule 5, etc, to get a few better arms.

And they are easy to flip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You’re assuming he’s tried to build one.  But exactly how many times did we not have a below average bullpen between 1998-2011?
 

He has had two off seasons, if he hasn't tried to build a bullpen he should probably be fired. 

I see this a lot.  "Its okay the Orioles are terrible because Elias has tried to make [insert aspect of team] better."

Its a pretty lazy team building.  The GM should always try and build more talent into the system and that doesn't always take free agent signings.

While its great he has built a top farm system we also need to acknowledge that Elias has been fairly terrible at identifying additional talent.

Maybe Wells, maybe Urias, maybe Mateo.  Not much there.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Camden_yardbird said:

He has had two off seasons, if he hasn't tried to build a bullpen he should probably be fired. 

I see this a lot.  "Its okay the Orioles are terrible because Elias has tried to make [insert aspect of team] better."

Its a pretty lazy team building.  The GM should always try and build more talent into the system and that doesn't always take free agent signings.

While its great he has built a top farm system we also need to acknowledge that Elias has been fairly terrible at identifying additional talent.

Maybe Wells, maybe Urias, maybe Mateo.  Not much there.

I don’t think he’s been terrible. Was he actually trying to build a ML team? The three you mentioned were two waiver claims and a rule 5 pick. Waiver claims are another team’s trash that they were unable to trade. His rule 5 track record is not too great, but injuries to Martin make the grade incomplete just yet. The two pitchers in 2020 and Sceroler in 2021 were just not worthy. 

He did sign Iglesias, Galvis and Franco to FA deals. Iglesias was fantastic and Elias traded him since his value will not ever be higher. Galvis was pretty good before the injury, and he traded him for a low end bullpen minor league arm. Franco looked about 50 years old most of the year, but most thought he would be a slight improvement over Ruiz. 

He signed Matt Harvey, who has been up and down, sure. But he has been a good cheap veteran addition. A role model for the young guys to see what a real pro looks like in his routine and the way he prepares and competes. Tommy Milone worked out pretty good as well. He got bargain basement performance for bargain basement prices. 

Severino was a waiver claim, and yes, he’s been maddening often. Some good, some bad. Rio Ruiz was the same. Both were solid claims though. Hanser Alberto was not a bad claim either. 

I am sure I am forgetting other acquisitions, but it isn’t a bad list. It is what it is. A rebuild. He was open about it the entire time. He was not going to sink resources into the ML team for the first few years. I think this coming year is when it begins to change. Maybe I am wrong, but to judge Elias on his talent acquisitions is premature in my opinion. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ellas and Hyde gotta go? Go where? OK, to paraphrase Ghost Busters- "Who ya goin call?" 

With this ownership? Really?  - "Who ya goin call?" 

I'm getting use to this "stress free environment!"  Wake me next year (if you can) and we will analyze and talk.?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Too Tall said:

Ellas and Hyde gotta go? Go where? OK, to paraphrase Ghost Busters- "Who ya goin call?" 

With this ownership? Really?  - "Who ya goin call?" 

I'm getting use to this "stress free environment!"  Wake me next year (if you can) and we will analyze and talk.?

 

I think we all know who has to go to give this rebuild a good chance to work. Most of us, anyhow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Pickles said:

It's HARD to find a good SS without spending significant assets.  It is comparatively easy to find a BP arm without spending significant assets.

I think they could have done better in the last two years or so of rooting through that waiver wire, rule 5, etc, to get a few better arms.

Thats all Tampa Bay appeared to do, besides the guys they had in the system already.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...