Jump to content

Cedric Mullins - 30/30 ?


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Philip said:

Mullins is without a doubt going to be the Os MVP. I’m wondering if whoever is second would be there merely as a courtesy, because the distance between Cedric, and Defense on office and on the basis, is so far ahead of anybody else.

Do they even disclose who came in second?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

What are you expectations for him next year and beyond?

.280/.340/.450

I can easily see a decline.  I also wouldn't be surprised if this is who he is.  

Not a lot of comps out there for guys who came up, struggled mightily, gave up switch hitting, worked their ass off and raked for a whole year.  Dude might **** around and lead the league in hits.

I really don't know what to think.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the power sees the biggest drop off.  He should be able to hit for a good average if he continues to be even halfway decent vs lefties.  
 

I would think a 280/350 BA/OBP line is obtainable.  The speed will be there, the defense is good but not great.

The power is what is separating him this year. I expect to see a pretty big drop in that. 
 

Part of me really wants to see him dealt this offseason but I think we need more info on a guy like Cowser in CF.  
 

I think he’s a 1.5-3WAR guy going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Maybe Means. Maybe Mountcastle.  

Means has 3.6 bWAR and Mountcastle has 1.0 Means would clearly be second and he’s not as far behind Mullins’ 4.8 as I thought.

Interesting tidbit is that Urias has 1.6 BWAR in more than 200 fewer ABs than Mountcastle. Wonder why…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Do they even disclose who came in second?

I have no idea. I was just pointing out how far ahead of everybody else Mullins has been. Even if his defense is scuffling a bit right now, He still our best outfielder, although McKenna is really showing himself well with the glove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

.280/.340/.450

I can easily see a decline.  I also wouldn't be surprised if this is who he is.  

Not a lot of comps out there for guys who came up, struggled mightily, gave up switch hitting, worked their ass off and raked for a whole year.  Dude might **** around and lead the league in hits.

I really don't know what to think.  

Early in the season I compared him to Mookie Betts without the arm. I got mocked, predictably. That's looking like a pretty fair comp right now though strictly in terms of this season in a vacuum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Philip said:

Means has 3.6 bWAR and Mountcastle has 1.0 Means would clearly be second and he’s not as far behind Mullins’ 4.8 as I thought.

Interesting tidbit is that Urias has 1.6 BWAR in more than 200 fewer ABs than Mountcastle. Wonder why…

Mountcastle's defense in the OF early in the year wrecked his WAR. Also Urias has been a solid all around player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Early in the season I compared him to Mookie Betts without the arm. I got mocked, predictably. That's looking like a pretty fair comp right now though strictly in terms of this season in a vacuum. 

Betts is having a down year, by his standards and is 28 years old.  Good chance he can bounce back next year.  Even still, his OPS is .898 right now.

Can Cedric be a .900+ OPS guy?  Betts even passed 1.000 in 2018 when he won the MVP. 

That's the thing, in a vacuum this season you're correct.  They're comparable, with Cedric looking better in some categories.  But Betts' worst year since 2017 is comparable to Cedric's best.  Unfortunately, looking in a vacuum doesn't really help us going forward. 

IMO, heading into 2022, seeing if Cedric can repeat this year or come close to it is one of the biggest questions.  If he does repeat, your comp might not be too far off base.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Betts is having a down year, by his standards and is 28 years old.  Good chance he can bounce back next year.  Even still, his OPS is .898 right now.

Can Cedric be a .900+ OPS guy?  Betts even passed 1.000 in 2018 when he won the MVP. 

That's the thing, in a vacuum this season you're correct.  They're comparable, with Cedric looking better in some categories.  But Betts' worst year since 2017 is comparable to Cedric's best.  Unfortunately, looking in a vacuum doesn't really help us going forward. 

IMO, heading into 2022, seeing if Cedric can repeat this year or come close to it is one of the biggest questions.  If he does repeat, your comp might not be too far off base.  

I like his chances to repeat based on the simplicity of his swing, ability to hit lefties, and the fact that he's been so consistent all year. Also, he doesn't chase much so you have to pitch to him and he can do anything from walk to bunt to homer. But of course a year ago he was on the bust pile, so who knows! 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I think the power sees the biggest drop off.  He should be able to hit for a good average if he continues to be even halfway decent vs lefties.  
 

I would think a 280/350 BA/OBP line is obtainable.  The speed will be there, the defense is good but not great.

The power is what is separating him this year. I expect to see a pretty big drop in that. 
 

Part of me really wants to see him dealt this offseason but I think we need more info on a guy like Cowser in CF.  
 

I think he’s a 1.5-3WAR guy going forward.

This is a good park for him.   He has 17 homers at home.  7 on the road.   He once hit 13 homers in 76 games at Bowie.   He certainly doesn't have huge power.  I see him as a 15-20 homer guy but I wouldn't be surprised if he hit over 25 again.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It takes Orioles rookies 60 or 70 at bats to get their first two hits.
    • Tell me how can Harbaugh help him when he doesn't know how to help himself. Harbs is the worst at burning timeouts stupidly then not having any when they are needed at crunch time. 
    • Yes the same here. They are going to the playoffs and yet I have no feeling towards it whatsoever. Weird feeling. Like you just know they are going to get bounced in the first round. It looks inevitable. I mean you could make a case the Tigers are more deserving of the Orioles spot. They are playing some great baseball of late. 
    • Man Baltimore sports has not been kind. The Orioles are on a  3 month tailspin and the Ravens did what they do best and blew another double digit 4th quarter lead to a inferior team.  Let's see if the Orioles can right the ship,  though I'm not holding my breath on that one at all. Yikes. 
    • Idk how impactful this was, probably pretty low on the list of problems, but this is the 2nd straight week that Lamar threw the ball late in the game and the receiver was unable to get oob.  The ball to Bateman is probably excusable because we had more time on the clock and we needed the deep ball to be in position to make a run, but this time throwing a 12 yard dump to Andrews was just straight up stupid IMO.  I get that they're going to play outside leverage all day every day in this situation but just throw it away and try to take another shot.  Lamar has to have more clock awareness than that,  and Harbaugh has to instill in him the importance of saving those seconds on the clock.
    • Sorry but that response from Fuller sounds to me like too many words, concepts, abstractions, and if that's how he communicates, wordy and convoluted, it's a lot for hitters to carry "into the box." Not to mention all the specifics involved, re. what pitches and locations to look for, all the analytics of how to do the swing and torque the body, etc. I'm no coach but I can imagine a whole season of this approach just becomes information overload. Maybe it's not rocket science, after all (with all due respect to ex-NASA Sig). Maybe the antidote is more Zen: just see the pitch and hit the dang thing.  BTW I think the analytical, overthinking approach is better suited to the pitching side, where you can plan your attack based on all the data. Hitting is more reaction, no time to think. You can't beat pitching using the same approach--rather, need the opposite approach, to counter with instinct and intuition. At least, that's my cheap (2 cents) advice!
    • The proposition that every auction automatically results in an overpay is simplified indeed.  Granted, "kind of true" is a low bar to clear, but still...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...