Jump to content

Kelvin Gutierrez’s defense


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't understand how, with every team is operating under the same constraints folks are willing to write off an entire season.  This was the plan.  The only thing we missed out on last year was a hundred games of them being bad.   Look at this team, there was nothing that could have happened in a full season last year that would have led to this team being anything other than a train wreck.  If anything it helped Elias since he can keep Adley down another season while the rest of the prospects develop.

But that’s just it, they didn’t develop (except for the select group at Bowie). And that was vs their own guys. How many guys missed out on development? Rutschman and GrayRod benefited? Those two would probably incease their development throwing a ball against a wall or hitting off a tee. Ok, maybe not. But marginal guys? Or, guys drafted outside of the first three rounds? Nah. 

I figured people might disagree on that point and it’s arguable, but you of all people!

Ok, what about being the only team w/ virtually no presence in Latin America before Elias changed it (alright, team Angelos gave the ok-woo hoo!)? How is that the same?

What I’m saying is, Elias-wait-you read the other posts in which I said he needs to get busy? Ok. But otherwise, yes, he was in an unenviable position from the jump. I know, I know-who wouldn’t take a GM job for a ML baseball team? I’m sure it’s not as much a lock as some might think, especially in Baltimore. 

And don’t undersell being spared from viewing these guys for 100 games. Weren’t they in first for a while? You know, the first 20 games or so.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elias was one of the guys tagged to work on the eliminate minor league teams and do away with drafted players playing games the year they were drafted initiative.

Something like what happened in 2020 should have hurt the Orioles, and their approach, less than other teams.  Compared to the norm it should have been an advantage

Having the signing period altered in the international market should also have been an advantage to a team that is behind.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think he's doing a PR job for MLB.  I think it was a PR move by the Astros but I don't think MLB was involved and I think Dusty was more than willing to take the job.

I don't care for him as a manager but it's mostly about the talent.

What is it about his managing you don’t like? I’m not a fan either, but wonder if it’s for the same reasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

What is it about his managing you don’t like? I’m not a fan either, but wonder if it’s for the same reasons. 

His handling of pitching mostly.  Also he just seems not that great at the tactics level.  Haven't been watching him this year if I'm being honest.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Elias was one of the guys tagged to work on the eliminate minor league teams and do away with drafted players playing games the year they were drafted initiative.

Something like what happened in 2020 should have hurt the Orioles, and their approach, less than other teams.  Compared to the norm it should have been an advantage

Having the signing period altered in the international market should also have been an advantage to a team that is behind.

Eh, don’t understand your first point. You have a link? First I’ve ever heard of that. 

Second, nope. 

Finally, huh? How do the Orioles gain an advantage in the one area in which they were dreadfully far behind? Not buying it. 

Look, I’m not that far off from you in my expectations of where he has them, but I certainly didn’t expect an Astros-style three year turnaround. That wasn’t going to happen.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

His handling of pitching mostly.  Also he just seems not that great at the tactics level.  Haven't been watching him this year if I'm being honest.

His handling of pitching has been scrutinized since the Cubs and Prior. He isn’t a whiz tactically. I’ve watched plenty of the ‘Stros this year and I  could have them in the same position. They’re good enough to overcome bad tactics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Il BuonO said:

Eh, don’t understand your first point. You have a link? First I’ve ever heard of that. 

Second, nope. 

Finally, huh? How do the Orioles gain an advantage in the one area in which they were dreadfully far behind? Not buying it. 

Look, I’m not that far off from you in my expectations of where he has them, but I certainly didn’t expect an Astros-style three year turnaround. That wasn’t going to happen.
 

 

I think this is it.  It was a couple years ago and not everything they proposed happened.

https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/mlb-floats-proposal-that-would-eliminate-42-minor-league-teams/

 

Anything that causes a delay helps the teams that are behind, it gives them time to catch up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, wildcard said:

Mike: "We're going to be needing infielders next year. I think some of them will be coming from outside the organization  but also guys like him (Mateo) and Urias showed us enough talented and  production that we are going to try to have a place for them in our plans going into the off season."

6:50 into the interview.

https://www.audacy.com/1057thefan/sports/os-gm-mike-elias-talks-os-future-with-the-bbms

Perhaps Elias will bring in an infielder or two. This interview was from 9/16, about 16 days ago. Some things have changed a bit since then. It was before Gutierrez showed some progress, however small sample it is. His process needs to be changed and he seems to be doing so. It would not shock me at all if Elias brings in a legitimate SS, and perhaps a 3B. Urias and Mateo should be back, but there are upgrades available. Jam Jones, well he has a lot to prove. But Gutierrez, for me, has shown more than enough that would have me bring him back. If we DFA him, he will have no trouble getting a job. I put him at a similar status to Mateo, in that his talent is raw and exciting, and there is no way to know what they will bring to the table in 2022. They do not have a track record of great success yet. But then we would not have been able to acquire them on waivers if they did.

For me, I keep him and keep playing him at 3B. I keep Mateo and Urias. I would like to see all three play Winter Ball in the Caribbean. I can see bringing in a Freddy Galvis type and moving him at the deadline when Westburg comes up.

I would likely cut Bannon, and probably Richie Martin as well. Maybe they can move them in minor deals. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

Perhaps Elias will bring in an infielder or two. This interview was from 9/16, about 16 days ago. Some things have changed a bit since then. It was before Gutierrez showed some progress, however small sample it is. His process needs to be changed and he seems to be doing so. It would not shock me at all if Elias brings in a legitimate SS, and perhaps a 3B. Urias and Mateo should be back, but there are upgrades available. Jam Jones, well he has a lot to prove. But Gutierrez, for me, has shown more than enough that would have me bring him back. If we DFA him, he will have no trouble getting a job. I put him at a similar status to Mateo, in that his talent is raw and exciting, and there is no way to know what they will bring to the table in 2022. They do not have a track record of great success yet. But then we would not have been able to acquire them on waivers if they did.

For me, I keep him and keep playing him at 3B. I keep Mateo and Urias. I would like to see all three play Winter Ball in the Caribbean. I can see bringing in a Freddy Galvis type and moving him at the deadline when Westburg comes up.

I would likely cut Bannon, and probably Richie Martin as well. Maybe they can move them in minor deals. 

No chance I'd use a 40 man roster spot on Martin.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

I certainly believe he will bring in some other infielders.   Whether they’ll be actual, sure to make the team upgrades or just take a flyer types remains to be seen, and Elias certainly didn’t promise the former.   

So, this exactly. Parse your words carefully, very, very carefully. 

It remains to be seen.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

 But Gutierrez, for me, has shown more than enough that would have me bring him back. If we DFA him, he will have no trouble getting a job. I put him at a similar status to Mateo, in that his talent is raw and exciting, and there is no way to know what they will bring to the table in 2022. They do not have a track record of great success yet. But then we would not have been able to acquire them on waivers if they did.

For me, I keep him and keep playing him at 3B. I keep Mateo and Urias. I would like to see all three play Winter Ball in the Caribbean. I can see bringing in a Freddy Galvis type and moving him at the deadline when Westburg comes up.

I would likely cut Bannon, and probably Richie Martin as well. Maybe they can move them in minor deals. 

I am coming around to this. Even with an IF signing we should be able carry Gutierrez, Mateo, and Urias. That doesn't mean they all play 162 games but they should get enough AB's to continue to be evaluated. 

Jones and Martin have shown nothing. If Mancini is traded, his spot could go to a guy like Harrison who could DH but also play some 3B if one of the infielders isn't working out. As many holes as we have we can't drop any guys that have potential to provide more than replacement value at low cost. Worst case scenario they are assets to be traded. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

No chance I'd use a 40 man roster spot on Martin.

It is unfortunate, but I think his time here may have run its course. Maybe he stays as minor league depth, but someone will want him to come in and compete for a 40 man spot. I wish him well either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

It is unfortunate, but I think his time here may have run its course. Maybe he stays as minor league depth, but someone will want him to come in and compete for a 40 man spot. I wish him well either way. 

What I find interesting is he has the same career rWAR as Walter Thomas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What I find interesting is he has the same career rWAR as Walter Thomas.

Interesting. You had me there for a second. And then I remembered that Bancy Thomas is his grandfather. Richie can play defensively. It is a shame he has been set back with all of the injuries. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
    • IMHO it's not about whether Crochet is an "opener" or a reliever, it's the innings.  He's never thrown more than 65 innings (at college in 2019) in his entire college or pro career and stands at 105.1 today.  Let that sink in.  On top of that, there is Crochet's TJ surgery, where he missed all of 2022 and had multiple stints on the IL in 2023 as he was recovering, tossing a total of 25 IP. Does any of this mean he cannot throw double (130 IP) or triple (195 IP) his prior max?  No one can say for certain, but I'd think any reasonable person would agree that, at the very least, it's a far riskier proposition for someone like Crochet than a pitcher who has been a starter and has thrown 150+ IP before.  So, to recap: The most innings he's ever thrown was 65 IP in college (2019) After throwing 54 innings of relief for the White Sox in 2021, he missed all of 2022 with Tommy John surgery He followed up in 2023 by throwing a total of 25 innings of relief, as he dealt with a couple of IL stints recovering from TJ His first ever pro start came this season and he's been dynamite through 105.1 IP Elias and Sig are well aware of the risks and it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...