Jump to content

This is one of the worst teams I’ve seen at turning double plays


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I suppose it’s not surprising for a team that has started 7 different 2B and 5 different SS, but this is one of the worst Orioles teams I’ve seen at turning the DP.   They are 29th in MLB with 91 DP’s, and Fangraphs ranks them 25th in DPR, which is their measure of DP efficiency.  They are 30th in the percentage of DP situations converted into DP’s, at 7%.

I feel like almost nightly, there is some DP opportunity where the runner at 1B is safe by a close margin, where either there is either a slight delay in the initial throw, a slight hiccup on the relay transfer or a pivot throw that just isn’t strong enough.   Last night there were two, one on a slight delay by Gutierrez in making the initial throw, the second on an awkward toss by Martin to Valaika on a ball up the middle.   (In fairness, Gutierrez also started one nice DP.)

Part of this is just lack of time playing together, part is that these guys just aren’t very good.   But it’s playing out on a nightly basis.  

I miss the Manny/Hardy/Schoop days.  A lot.  


 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the first ranger oriole game, the Texas radio guy commented on a play that could have been a DP But they only got the lead runner, because Pat Valaika Made a lazy throw to second, and whoever caught the ball for the force made a lazy feed to first. A similar play happened in that same inning or in the next, and the radio guy pointed out that although they weren't errors,”…the Orioles Defense has given the Rangers several extra outs.” 
That’s just part of the reason why this isn’t a good team. They just aren’t good players.

Pat Valaika has his million+ bucks, his pension and his insurance. Time to send him away, and several more guys after him.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...Galvis or Iglesias?   I imagine both would like to be everyday SS again to open next season.

And oooh...what about beer and tacos?

Neither Jones nor Vavra has positioned themselves for early 2B reps in 2022 like I hoped they might this year.

I think I like 3B for Urias in hopes of keeping his body a little fresher to see if the bat can get past 300 PA.

Assuming based on Rob's whispers, 2022 OD payroll is more like $35M than $70M, though today of course no one knows precise revenue sharing, etc. type terms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

.

Assuming based on Rob's whispers, 2022 OD payroll is more like $35M than $70M, though today of course no one knows precise revenue sharing, etc. type terms.

“Rob’s Whispers” would be a great name for a website. Until then, who is Rob?“

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OrioleDog said:

So...Galvis or Iglesias?   I imagine both would like to be everyday SS again to open next season.

And oooh...what about beer and tacos?

Neither Jones nor Vavra has positioned themselves for early 2B reps in 2022 like I hoped they might this year.

I think I like 3B for Urias in hopes of keeping his body a little fresher to see if the bat can get past 300 PA.

Assuming based on Rob's whispers, 2022 OD payroll is more like $35M than $70M, though today of course no one knows precise revenue sharing, etc. type terms.

I have no more information than anyone else (and less than many), but I think Urias starts spring training as the presumptive second baseman, with cheap free agents signed to man the left side and Valaika and Martin competing for roles as back-ups/injury replacements. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Philip said:

Pat Valaika has his million+ bucks, his pension and his insurance. Time to send him away, and several more guys after him.

Well, yeah, that's the point of replacement level roster fillers during a rebuild.  They are cheap options to play for the team, so that you don't spend a bunch of money for marginally better results when you're not trying to win.  When it's time to start shifting into win mode, you send them packing in order to employ better players.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Morgan423 said:

Well, yeah, that's the point of replacement level roster fillers during a rebuild.  They are cheap options to play for the team, so that you don't spend a bunch of money for marginally better results when you're not trying to win.  When it's time to start shifting into win mode, you send them packing in order to employ better players.

Sure, I’m fully aware of the situation. As I said at the end of my comment, it is my hope that lots and lots of guys will be given their walking papers in the next six weeks or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Philip said:

During the first ranger oriole game, the Texas radio guy commented on a play that could have been a DP.....A similar play happened in that same inning or in the next, and the radio guy pointed out that although they weren't errors,”…the Orioles Defense has given the Rangers several extra outs.” 

The Rangers radio broadcast team do a very good job. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SilverRocket said:

That combo was such a consistent machine. Schoop got a ton of extra double plays with that arm.

I wonder how close Gunnar, Westburg and Mayo can get. Scouting reports have Gunnar with a 60 arm, Westburg with 55, Mayo with 70.

I think the arms will be fine.  Just a matter of whether they can be sure handed and have the range.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/25/2021 at 10:28 AM, Frobby said:

I suppose it’s not surprising for a team that has started 7 different 2B and 5 different SS, but this is one of the worst Orioles teams I’ve seen at turning the DP.   They are 29th in MLB with 91 DP’s, and Fangraphs ranks them 25th in DPR, which is their measure of DP efficiency.  They are 30th in the percentage of DP situations converted into DP’s, at 7%.

I feel like almost nightly, there is some DP opportunity where the runner at 1B is safe by a close margin, where either there is either a slight delay in the initial throw, a slight hiccup on the relay transfer or a pivot throw that just isn’t strong enough.   Last night there were two, one on a slight delay by Gutierrez in making the initial throw, the second on an awkward toss by Martin to Valaika on a ball up the middle.   (In fairness, Gutierrez also started one nice DP.)

Part of this is just lack of time playing together, part is that these guys just aren’t very good.   But it’s playing out on a nightly basis.  

I miss the Manny/Hardy/Schoop days.  A lot.  


 

I wanted to sign Schoop before his big bounce back  year, loved him! 
 

Yeah, dreadful team to watch. In a year so laughably painful, lots of good storylines surprisingly: Mullins, Means, Mancini and frankly Mateo. The M’s! Only if McKenna could get hot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...