Jump to content

Pablo Lopez


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

Definitely should try to add young pitching wherever they can, but I'll say the crazy thing. I think they should also be targeting a top vet or vets. You can't build a full staff/team on young alone. I think experience really matters.

If I were owner with a lot of $, I'd personally go after Grienke and/or Scherzer. Yeah, I know, that's definitely not happening, but it's what I'd do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should probably be prepared that no one of note is traded off the roster this off-season. Elias has played it safe with trades so far (obvious reliever trades, obvious veteran trades). Will he trade one of his good, young players like Mullins or Means? I'm not sure yet. And does anyone want Santander or Mancini? I'm not sure about that either.

It all adds up to a feeling of doubt regarding any notable trades happening. Maybe Sulser, but even with that they could wait until the deadline. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I feel like we'd have to add to that trade and probably significantly. Santander just isn't that valuable. I'd do it in a heartbeat though.

Well, you can also say that Anderson is only so valuable too.  I think Santander for Anderson, especially with Santander being cheaper and having an extra year of service time, is a fair offer.
 

 Whether we have to add to it largely depends on what value they place on Mullins.

If they value him as a 4+ WAR guy with several years of service time at a prime position, Lopez and Meyer is a fair offer.

If they value him as a 2-3 WAR guy than I agree we would need to add to it.  
 

I will say this though…I would rather trade Mullins in a deal to obtain pitching like this than trade say, DL Hall and other prospects for Lopez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Who said Lopez is available? Why would Ng trade a solid #2/#3 SP under team control? 

Did you read the tweet in the OP?

Lots of talk of the Marlins using some of their pitching depth, which they do have, to acquire some positional talent.  
 

This is what the Os have been building  to do, so they should be all over this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Whether we have to add to it largely depends on what value they place on Mullins.

If they value him as a 4+ WAR guy with several years of service time at a prime position, Lopez and Meyer is a fair offer.

If they value him as a 2-3 WAR guy than I agree we would need to add to it.  

Yeah, I just don't think he'll be valued as a 4+ WAR player, last year notwithstanding. Still, you go get really good arms when you can. We have a lot of guys that we could put in a deal for two arms like this. I'd happily start with Mullins and consider adding from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Yeah, I just don't think he'll be valued as a 4+ WAR player, last year notwithstanding. Still, you go get really good arms when you can. We have a lot of guys that we could put in a deal for two arms like this. I'd happily start with Mullins and consider adding from there.

That’s obviously where things will be at.  We just don’t know where they value him.  Still, I don’t think you would need to “significantly add” to this deal unless your definition of significantly is different than mine.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Did you read the tweet in the OP?

Lots of talk of the Marlins using some of their pitching depth, which they do have, to acquire some positional talent.  
 

This is what the Os have been building  to do, so they should be all over this.

Tweet says Blue Jays checking. Didn't say anything about Marlins offering. I would be really surprised to see them trade Lopez.

If he's available I'd be interested. I could see offering Hays and see what they say. Lopez may have a slightly higher WAR ceiling (2.7 WAR in only 100 innings) but Hays has an extra year of control. Would be trading from strength to strength.

Similar to the Luis Castillo idea someone proposed, I would not want to trade a high level prospect for three years of Lopez when the first year is likely to be noncompetitive but if they were interested in making a lateral trade OF for pitching I could see that being a win for both teams. They could have Mancini as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a no-brainer to remind everybody that any interested team will say “he’s just a regular guy,”and the Orioles will say “he’s the second coming.”

On the one hand, he did come out of nowhere, but on the other hand it’s possible to attribute that to giving up switchhitting, and point to the fact that he did it all season he was very consistent with both bat and glove. Who is the best salesman?

The most interesting subplot will be how the other GM’s deal with the first woman GM, and how she will deal with them. I don’t know if the Marlins are big trades yet, so that remains to be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LookinUp said:

Definitely should try to add young pitching wherever they can, but I'll say the crazy thing. I think they should also be targeting a top vet or vets. You can't build a full staff/team on young alone. I think experience really matters.

If I were owner with a lot of $, I'd personally go after Grienke and/or Scherzer. Yeah, I know, that's definitely not happening, but it's what I'd do.

Why? Why can’t you build a staff on “Young“ alone? The old guys have lots of money and lots of experience, is that worth overpaying for their past and blocking one of the young guys? What benefit does that experience offer? They aren’t going to be coaching, the real coaches might be a bit miffed at that, and I’m not sure they offer anything worth their cost.

I’m not necessarily saying you’re wrong, but the qualities you’re describing are very tenuous and ethereal, I’m not sure they are worth pursuing. 

At the moment, we have a whole lot of flotsam and jetsam, and no guarantee that any of it will turn into something worth keeping, but at the same time we have to give all of it a chance to audition. Bringing an aged veteran on board is not productive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

That’s obviously where things will be at.  We just don’t know where they value him.  Still, I don’t think you would need to “significantly add” to this deal unless your definition of significantly is different than mine.

 

Mullins, Santander + 2 guys in our 10-25 range for both of those SP.

So Mullins, Santander, Vavra, Willems, for example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Baring injury Adley gets more War. Who do you want up to bat in a winner take all playoff game? Who do you want behind the plate with a Rickey Henderson type on first base in a tie ballgame 9th inning? I really bought into the switch hitting Jesus thing with Wieters.  This disappointment (perhaps misguided) led me to really not want to use a 1/1 draft pick on a catcher.   I am kind of wishing we went with Witt.   I think I heard people saying the most important position on defense is catcher.  So how does it compare to SS or Centerfield.   Would you be better off using Rick Dempsey type all glove and arm with light bat or going all in on a 1/1 on a catcher? If this has already been discussed tons dont yell at me I sometimes go months or weeks without posting.  
    • Glad Bob Melvin and I don’t see eye to eye on that issue Well said, that make two of us, Bunting Ced down 5-3 with nobody out that late in the game is absurd.
    • Sorry to hear this--wishing you a sound recovery, in time for the O's run to the Series! (That would speed up the healing!)
    • Santander is a good case for the Rule V draft. That's unfortunately the same system that's going to make his next contract potentially look bad. If only he were a couple of years younger. It's hard to commit 25+M to a player at 30+. He's going to be missed in Baltimore, on the field and by the fans, but he's someone that they're going to have to let move on. 
    • While I agree and find your comment funny, maybe just say something along the line of”Don’t give up on this team” or “Quite being Debbie downers” instead of assuming they are projecting the own misery in their lives. People might take it better if it doesn’t feel like a personal attack. Either way, that win felt good and I HOPE this is finally the turning point going into the playoffs soon. 
    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...