Jump to content

Which of the remaining Free Agents are the best fit for the O's?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I know there's literally zero chance this happens, but I'd go after... Carlos Rodon.  He's a major injury risk, and supposedly that's gonna keep everyone from offering him more than 2 to 3 years.  So offer him 4 years.  He showed last season that when he's 100% healthy, he's a legit TOR starter, but after coming back from the injured list in August, his velocity was down, and he didn't do well in the playoffs.  But he just turned 29.  White Sox decided not to make him an 18.4 mil qualifying offer - an indication they don't think there's a big market for him.  Give him a 4 year contract that includes incentives for number of starts.  

Then make the trade with Miami to get Lopez and Meyer.  Our starting rotation at the end of the year would be Rodon, Means, Lopez, GrayRod, and Meyer - with Hall next in line.    

       

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

I know there's literally zero chance this happens, but I'd go after... Carlos Rodon.  He's a major injury risk, and supposedly that's gonna keep everyone from offering him more than 2 to 3 years.  So offer him 4 years.  He showed last season that when he's 100% healthy, he's a legit TOR starter, but after coming back from the injured list in August, his velocity was down, and he didn't do well in the playoffs.  But he just turned 29.  White Sox decided not to make him an 18.4 mil qualifying offer - an indication they don't think there's a big market for him.  Give him a 4 year contract that includes incentives for number of starts.  

Then make the trade with Miami to get Lopez and Meyer.  Our starting rotation at the end of the year would be Rodon, Means, Lopez, GrayRod, and Meyer - with Hall next in line.    

       

The WS, a playoff team, not willing to take a 1 year, 18M risk on him tells me they don't feel very confident about his health for THIS season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

I know there's literally zero chance this happens, but I'd go after... Carlos Rodon.  He's a major injury risk, and supposedly that's gonna keep everyone from offering him more than 2 to 3 years.  So offer him 4 years.  He showed last season that when he's 100% healthy, he's a legit TOR starter, but after coming back from the injured list in August, his velocity was down, and he didn't do well in the playoffs.  But he just turned 29.  White Sox decided not to make him an 18.4 mil qualifying offer - an indication they don't think there's a big market for him.  Give him a 4 year contract that includes incentives for number of starts.  

Then make the trade with Miami to get Lopez and Meyer.  Our starting rotation at the end of the year would be Rodon, Means, Lopez, GrayRod, and Meyer - with Hall next in line.    

       

We have no idea if Miami will trade with us. We have no idea if Rodon will agree to a contract that essentially isn't guaranteed. I would be OK with both ideas but it takes two sides to agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

We have no idea if Miami will trade with us. We have no idea if Rodon will agree to a contract that essentially isn't guaranteed. I would be OK with both ideas but it takes two sides to agree. 

I started out by saying I realize it has no chance; it's what I would try to do.    

Any trade idea we'd come up with has an extremely small chance of happening.  The point is to discuss its merits if we were running the team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ruzious said:

I started out by saying I realize it has no chance; it's what I would try to do.    

Any trade idea we'd come up with has an extremely small chance of happening.  The point is to discuss its merits if we were running the team.  

Edit - Any acquisition idea...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

... which is what I said.  

You said we should offer him a 4-year contract when the team that knows his situation best, and is a contender, wouldn't gamble 1/18 on him.  I  don't think we are saying the same thing.  I would be very weary of offering him a 4 year contract and it's unlikely he signs one with a low base and heavily incentivised.  It's not a bad idea if he would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

You said we should offer him a 4-year contract when the team that knows his situation best, and is a contender, wouldn't gamble 1/18 on him.  I  don't think we are saying the same thing.  I would be very weary of offering him a 4 year contract and it's unlikely he signs one with a low base and heavily incentivised.  It's not a bad idea if he would.

I said: "White Sox decided not to make him an 18.4 mil qualifying offer - an indication they don't think there's a big market for him."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's are obviously not a team that the better free agent pitchers are going to consider - all things being equal, so they need to be creative and take a chance or 2 - if they're going to be successful.  

And the salary minimum that's likely to be included in the next CBA will likely require them to spend some money.  I'd like to see them take a chance on something that could be better than mediocre.  I'd rather not spend the money on guys like Zach Davies, Brett Anderson, and Drew Smyly.  Try things like front-loading a contract - so they get closer to the salary minimum in the first 2 years while not paying as much later in the contract.    

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

 

 Try things like front-loading a contract - so they get closer to the salary minimum in the first 2 years while not paying as much later in the contract.    

  

The current cap is calculated using AAV, I'm positive any future floor would be as well.  Front loading is almost always a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Frustrating sure, but boring is not what I would I say. We do steal bases at times. I would like for us to play more small ball sometimes and it is frustrating to see us be so homerun happy. I think with Westy back, we will see a resurgence of timely hitting as that is very contagious.   We saw that at the beginning of the year. Amazing sight to see for sure. I think the most disheartening thing that really shocked me is the apathy and outright disgust I’ve seen from O’s fans toward their team. Perhaps we have been spoiled? No idea. Maybe expectations were too high? No idea, but frankly, a lot of yall focusing on other things and simply not watching/posting would make next season a lot more enjoyable. This is the first time since 96-97 where we make the playoffs in back to back years and you guys have been acting like some real lame jerks this whole dang season. Frankly, yall should be ashamed of yourselves. We are an incredibly young team and with that come highs and lows, but yall don’t see that. You just love to complain and moan and bloviate. Where’s the heart? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s the gratitude? You’d think with all this team has overcome, especially being so young, y’all would be happy, but no. So go off on your little bike rides or whatever. Go watch a movie if this saga seems boring to you. I don’t care. Just for once this season, keep your immense negativity to yourself.
    • Really an amazing run, 4 straight years. I completely agree with the ranking, too. There's no way Kjerstad is still a prospect though, right? 45 days is the cutoff and he's played in 48 games.
    • i think we all are going to have ptsd from that 9th inning for a while,it was that brutally bad . they need to do some special to get us to forget about it
    • wow,did gunnar and adley have to do this last season? 
    • I suggested that earlier but I think it's probably a bad play with no out. The O's have like 85% probability of scoring. There is a huge downside risk of Mullins popping up the bunt for a double play. He could also whiff on the bunt making at least Holliday an easy out. With one out and only 65% probability of scoring it's a much better play. I think if Santander and Mullins were reversed in the lineup Hyde may have done it but not when you have two shots to get the run in. 
    • WE GOT US ONE - JD5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Completely disagree about Orr. He will be fine. His defense has been better in its first few games compared to McDonald’s first few games.     And some of these big passing stats are over exaggerated. There have been mistakes for sure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...