Jump to content

Orioles sign Chris Owings


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Ok, if saying I'm ok with signing a super utility guy to a minor league contract is your definition of defending it, then sure, I'm defending it. lol

You crack me up sometimes. Norfolk needs some depth guys as well and a guy who can play just about every position decently is not a bad guy to have in the org. 

Now if we signed him to a major league contract and Elias said he's going to be the everyday "fill in the blank" I'd have issues. Otherwise, it's just a depth move which all teams are making. 

Every signing does not need to "move the needle" to be ok.

The problem is Tony, NO signings move the needle.  Every signing is garbage like this and every signing has the same spin you are saying. 
 

Im not even saying you are wrong but it’s SSDD with this organization and their approach to improving the ML team, something they obviously don’t care about doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize it's just a minor league signing, but at some point - when you get so many of these 4A types, it becomes a bit more clear - bit by bit - that you have no intention of using your resources to make even an attempt to significantly improve the team.  And we reach that point pretty much every year.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Former 1st round pick!!

Check out this line last year from Colorado:    .326/.420/.628  ***

That will play sir!

*** please don't ask for any further situational context.  thanks

Smells like a new wildcard favorite.  A great Valaika replacement!  

Given the fact that our key middle infield prospects are a year or two away, I'm assuming Owings sees some time in Baltimore this year but I'm not really expecting much here.  

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ruzious said:

I realize it's just a minor league signing, but at some point - when you get so many of these 4A types, it becomes a bit more clear - bit by bit - that you have no intention of using your resources to make even an attempt to significantly improve the team.  And we reach that point pretty much every year.  

And yet many people are fine with this.

It’s amazing to me that people accept this stuff and are fine with it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Smells like a new wildcard favorite.  A great Valaika replacement!  

Given the fact that our key middle infield prospects are a year or two away, I'm assuming Owings sees some time in Baltimore this year but I'm not really expecting much here.  

 

I would have used the "smells like" for Odor, but sure.  <rimshot>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And yet many people are fine with this.

It’s amazing to me that people accept this stuff and are fine with it.

Yep still ok with the plan that Elias put into place and has been clear and straight forward with the fanbase about since Day 1.

I will say that one year from now I expect him to start putting the pedal to the metal.   Feel free to hold me to that.   Just as I continue to question why you get so frustrated when Elias is doing exactly what he said he would do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m with the frustration that we’re not doing more to help the ML product, but if we were doing that we’d still need to sign guys like this to pad out our organization depth chart. He isn’t a surrogate for guys we should be signing. Odor or Lyles…maybe. Not this guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Yep still ok with the plan that Elias put into place and has been clear and straight forward with the fanbase about since Day 1.

I will say that one year from now I expect him to start putting the pedal to the metal.   Feel free to hold me to that.   Just as I continue to question why you get so frustrated when Elias is doing exactly what he said he would do.

The idea that he is doing what he said he would do means nothing.  It’s the idea that he feels he needs to do it in year 4 and that ownership doesn’t care.

It’s not needed to do this anymore.  It  was fine to do it in the past..not now.

And btw, Elias never gave a time table I don’t believe in how long he wouldn’t care about winning and even if he had and was following it, that doesn’t mean we should be ok with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, UMDTerrapins said:

I’m with the frustration that we’re not doing more to help the ML product, but if we were doing that we’d still need to sign guys like this to pad out our organization depth chart. He isn’t a surrogate for guys we should be signing. Odor or Lyles…maybe. Not this guy. 

We already have guys like this to pad our org depth chart.  And he probably gets a real chance to make the team too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The idea that he is doing what he said he would do means nothing.  It’s the idea that he feels he needs to do it in year 4 and that ownership doesn’t care.

It’s not needed to do this anymore.  It  was fine to do it in the past..not now.

And btw, Elias never gave a time table I don’t believe in how long he wouldn’t care about winning and even if he had and was following it, that doesn’t mean we should be ok with it.

I don't believe he feels he 'needs' to do anything.   I believe he thinks this is the most effective way to create a competitive (and sustainably competitive) MLB team in Baltimore.   You use the word "need" a lot and I think it is misleading.   He is freely choosing to rebuild in this way because he has seen it work before.   I trust his judgement more than I do frustrated fans on message boards (no offense intended).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any year, no matter winning or not if we make a depth signing like this it is always good. Take a chance on a guy and maybe he could provide something valuable. There is very little risk in it and potential reward. But I get it SG somethings will never make you happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just the part where the hundreds of free agents pick their spots.   

The candidates for spots 1001-1200 on the thirty 40-man rosters probably number in the thousands.    The Danny Duffy woo is the same as the Felix/M. Harvey one...sign here for reps!!    The money will be low, but the shot to show the league something is the value.   

Sometimes we get Jean Pinto and Garrett Stallings for the grind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And yet many people are fine with this.

It’s amazing to me that people accept this stuff and are fine with it.

What do you expect people to do? I’m not happy about it, but I have no control over what they spend. All you’re doing is annoying the bejesus out of the people here who already feel the same way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aglets said:

I don't believe he feels he 'needs' to do anything.   I believe he thinks this is the most effective way to create a competitive (and sustainably competitive) MLB team in Baltimore.   You use the word "need" a lot and I think it is misleading.   He is freely choosing to rebuild in this way because he has seen it work before.   I trust his judgement more than I do frustrated fans on message boards (no offense intended).

Well, he’s wrong.  You don’t need to suck for several years to be good.  The Orioles competing for a 500 record this year doesn’t stop them from winning long term.

Its completely foolish to think that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...