Jump to content

Orioles sign Chris Owings


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

I'm okay with it.  This year we get to see Grayson Rodriguez, Adley Rutschman, maybe D.L. Hall, Stowers, Westburg, etc.    I'm perfectly fine seeing the prospects start to come up and the GM decide when and where he wants to fill in around those guys with established major league players.   I could whine about things not happening faster but what good would that do?   lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MijiT88 said:

Any year, no matter winning or not if we make a depth signing like this it is always good. Take a chance on a guy and maybe he could provide something valuable. There is very little risk in it and potential reward. But I get it SG somethings will never make you happy.

How many of these signings do you want?  How about we go get real players who actually help you?

How about we get legit starting options?  How about they actually try for players who make you better?

Instead, we sign 37 MI to MiL contracts and say, well it’s good to have depth.  No it’s not.

Depth is good when players are good. These aren’t good players.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Yep still ok with the plan that Elias put into place and has been clear and straight forward with the fanbase about since Day 1.

I will say that one year from now I expect him to start putting the pedal to the metal.   Feel free to hold me to that.   Just as I continue to question why you get so frustrated when Elias is doing exactly what he said he would do.

The irony is some of the most vocal critics of the rebuild called for EXACTLY this kind of rebuild for years- many of those corresponding with us actually making the playoffs.

And three years into it, they completely flip-flop on their "principles", and start demanding signing FAs so we can "compete" for 75 wins.

Can't make this stuff up.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

I'm okay with it.  This year we get to see Grayson Rodriguez, Adley Rutschman, maybe D.L. Hall, Stowers, Westburg, etc.    I'm perfectly fine seeing the prospects start to come up and the GM decide when and where he wants to fill in around those guys with established major league players.   I could whine about things not happening faster but what good would that do?   lol

As long as they call them up and give them legit PT and a legit chance.

That has to be done first.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pickles said:

The irony is some of the most vocal critics of the rebuild called for EXACTLY this kind of rebuild for years- many of those corresponding with us actually making the playoffs.

And three years into it, they completely flip-flop on their "principles", and start demanding signing FAs so we can "compete" for 75 wins.

Can't make this stuff up.

That’s only because you are either ignorant to what is being said, legitimately aren’t smart enough to understand or just aren’t reading.

If you think you have to lose on purpose for 4+ years to be good long term, you are clueless.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

We already have guys like this to pad our org depth chart.  And he probably gets a real chance to make the team too.

$5 says this guy is out of the organization before June, unless injuries hit hard. And that’s the point of signing him. I don’t see his signing as relevant to your larger argument….which I mostly agree with. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, UMDTerrapins said:

$5 says this guy is out of the organization before June, unless injuries hit hard. And that’s the point of signing him. I don’t see his signing as relevant to your larger argument….which I mostly agree with. 

I don’t really care that they signed him.  I care that this is basically all they sign. I care they don’t make attempts to really get better and put a watchable product on the field.

Maybe by the second half they will call up a bunch of players who are actually worth watching.

Of course, I thought they may have done that last year and they didn’t.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Maybe by the second half they will call up a bunch of players have actually have something worth watching.

Of course, I thought they may have done that last year and they didn’t.

It will be interesting what they do with 40 man roster decisions this year. Take our current 40 and dump two players in spring training for AR and GR. Possibly a third for Stowers. While we'll still have guys remaining that we can dump without much fanfare, it will be getting tighter this year and beyond. Which is obviously a good thing. But 40 man roster considerations could hold back some guys (Neustrom, Sedlock, Knight, Peralta, Vespi) we'd otherwise like to get a look at over what we currently have. Personally.....that will drive me nuts.  As well as guys like Nevin having monster springs that dupe us into holding onto them longer than we should. But then again, hey.....it's spring and there's gonna be a season. Things could be worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UMDTerrapins said:

It will be interesting what they do with 40 man roster decisions this year. Take our current 40 and dump two players in spring training for AR and GR. Possibly a third for Stowers. While we'll still have guys remaining that we can dump without much fanfare, it will be getting tighter this year and beyond. Which is obviously a good thing. But 40 man roster considerations could hold back some guys (Neustrom, Sedlock, Knight, Peralta, Vespi) we'd otherwise like to get a look at over what we currently have. Personally.....that will drive me nuts.  As well as guys like Nevin having monster springs that dupe us into holding onto them longer than we should. But then again, hey.....it's spring and there's gonna be a season. Things could be worse. 

They should have plenty of guys they can easily drop off the 40 man.  I hope they don’t use that as an excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

The problem is Tony, NO signings move the needle.  Every signing is garbage like this and every signing has the same spin you are saying. 
 

Im not even saying you are wrong but it’s SSDD with this organization and their approach to improving the ML team, something they obviously don’t care about doing.

But if you want to talk approach, maybe make a thread and keep it in there instead of spamming every minor move with your disgust.

This move by itself is just a minor depth move. It's no big deal one way or the other. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

That’s only because you are either ignorant to what is being said, legitimately aren’t smart enough to understand or just aren’t reading.

If you think you have to lose on purpose for 4+ years to be good long term, you are clueless.  

C'mon Rob, tone it down a bit. You are better than this reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

C'mon Rob, tone it down a bit. You are better than this reply.

Well, I would think people would also be better than misrepresenting what has been said a million times but I guess I’m wrong about that.

If you are going to flat out lie, I’m going to call you out for it.  Pickles is flat out lying.  It’s either intentional or he’s clueless to what is being said.  You choose.  Neither is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They should have plenty of guys they can easily drop off the 40 man.  I hope they don’t use that as an excuse.

They will.  😁 

By the way, I'm emerging from my winter baseball hibernation and it's great to see you and a bunch of the usual faces again. Nice to see you're all in mid-season form. Ball looks good coming out your hand. Try not to overthrow too early. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...