Jump to content

Orioles sign Chris Owings


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

It appears that the Orioles are looking at Gutierrez, Owings and Nevin at 3B mostly this spring. I expect Gutierrez to start the year as the 3B and Owings to make it as a utility, especially with the 28-man roster to start the year. Nevin may share some 3B time with Bannon at 3B in Norfolk. 

Eww that’s pretty rough. What would you need to see from Nevin and Bannon at Norfolk to think they should get a shot in Baltimore? They were both sub .700 OPS last year and aren’t solid defensively. I get we don’t have many people that are major league ready, but neither guy has shown he can hit at an acceptable level in the minors. I don’t get how they keep getting opportunities. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Look, every once in a while a guy comes out of nowhere.  It’s not impossible and I would rather he get the third base at bats vs anyone on the team or in the organization that is close to or ML ready.(this is until Westburg and/or Henderson push their way up here this year)

But there isn’t much reason to believe he is all of a sudden going to start to hit.

He had over 2200 at bats in the minors and his career OPS is 741 and he never had an 800 OPS at any level.

I understand that.  But .741 is WAY above .615.   Years ago, I did a very back of the envelope study of how MiL OPS relates to major league OPS.   As I recall, on average the differential was about 35-50 points.   There’s a ton of variation, and you have to consider what age a player was at various levels, etc.  But you wouldn’t expect a .741 minor leaguer to hit only .615 in the majors.   You’d hope for .690-.705.   With pretty good defense, that wouldn’t be the worst 3B in the world.   So I’m hoping Gutierrez’s recent success might put him in that ballpark, at least.   Modest hopes for a decent placeholder until someone better comes along.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

Eww that’s pretty rough. What would you need to see from Nevin and Bannon at Norfolk to think they should get a shot in Baltimore? They were both sub .700 OPS last year and aren’t solid defensively. I get we don’t have many people that are major league ready, but neither guy has shown he can hit at an acceptable level in the minors. I don’t get how they keep getting opportunities. 

I don't expect much from either guy since I don't think either is much of a prospect. but I do like Westburg, Henderson and especially Mayo. Gutierrez can hold the fort.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm kind of rooting for Nevin to be like a slightly below league average hitter this year. He makes loud contact on occasion and doesn't give the impression that he's in over his head at the plate. The hits just don't happen often enough yet. But I think he could be like a Renato Nuñez type if it starts to click for him. Right now though he's more a Brandon Snyder type. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't expect much from either guy since I don't think either is much of a prospect. but I do like Westburg, Henderson and especially Mayo. Gutierrez can hold the fort.

Yeah that’s my thought too. At least Gutierrez does something good, so you can live with the poor bat.

I think SS/3B and SP is where Elias could’ve done something. There’s no IF prospects that are knocking on the door this year and plenty of holes in the starting rotation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

I understand that.  But .741 is WAY above .615.   Years ago, I did a very back of the envelope study of how MiL OPS relates to major league OPS.   As I recall, on average the differential was about 35-50 points.   There’s a ton of variation, and you have to consider what age a player was at various levels, etc.  But you wouldn’t expect a .741 minor leaguer to hit only .615 in the majors.   You’d hope for .690-.705.   With pretty good defense, that wouldn’t be the worst 3B in the world.   So I’m hoping Gutierrez’s recent success might put him in that ballpark, at least.   Modest hopes for a decent placeholder until someone better comes along.  

The idea that you are a 700 OPS proves my point.  They should have upgraded the spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The idea that you are a 700 OPS proves my point.  They should have upgraded the spot.

I’m not going to disagree with you on this.  I was in favor of some bigger infield upgrades than Odor and Owings.  But at this point, I’m just focused on hoping we get decent outcomes from the players we have to choose from.  Gutierrez managed to be worth 0.8 rWAR in 47 games despite his .663 OPS, because his defense in that span was outstanding.  I’m guessing over a larger sample his defense won’t be as good as last year, but his offense will be a little better.   So is it reasonable to hope for 1.5 - 2.5 rWAR from him?   That’s not earth-shattering, but considering that Franco was worth -1.6 rWAR last year, that would still be a nice upgrade.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I’m not going to disagree with you on this.  I was in favor of some bigger infield upgrades than Odor and Owings.  But at this point, I’m just focused on hoping we get decent outcomes from the players we have to choose from.  Gutierrez managed to be worth 0.8 rWAR in 47 games despite his .663 OPS, because his defense in that span was outstanding.  I’m guessing over a larger sample his defense won’t be as good as last year, but his offense will be a little better.   So is it reasonable to hope for 1.5 - 2.5 rWAR from him?   That’s not earth-shattering, but considering that Franco was worth -1.6 rWAR last year, that would still be a nice upgrade.   

If they get anything over a 1 WAR out of him, that should be considered a win.  It doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have upgraded the spot but it does mean that they got value out of the decision they made.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

If they get anything over a 1 WAR out of him, that should be considered a win.  It doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have upgraded the spot but it does mean that they got value out of the decision they made.

 

Agreed.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'd like to see if Gutierrez can still keep that level of defense that we saw from him last year at third.  Who we trot out there is of no consequence unless they're going to have someone they identify as a future cornerstone there.  

I like Gutierrez, and not just because he hit the walkoff today. He plays good D, has a canon for an arm, and they've been working with him on his swing which seems to be improving. He's infinitely more interesting than Odor. Freaking Chris Owings is more interesting than Odor. I might even venture to say he's more interesting than Rylan Bannon. There I said it. 

I'm team Guti. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, interloper said:

I like Gutierrez, and not just because he hit the walkoff today. He plays good D, has a canon for an arm, and they've been working with him on his swing which seems to be improving. He's infinitely more interesting than Odor. Freaking Chris Owings is more interesting than Odor. I might even venture to say he's more interesting than Rylan Bannon. There I said it. 

I'm team Guti. 

Given the options, I prefer Gutierrez, too.  

The only reason I'm 50/50 on Odor is because he decked Bautista a few years ago.  Hard to hate on a guy like that.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...