Jump to content

Why does MLB want it to be NY/Bos against everyone else?


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

I think a big part of the solution would be increasing the amount of service time a player must accumulate before free agency.

The luxury tax is a joke. All it does is reward average-to-below average players with bigger contracts than they deserve because those are the only free agents that 75% of baseball can get in on.

Can anyone else imagine the yanks, bosox, cubs, angels, or mets making a run at Cesar to play shortstop for them?

The owners better take a big long look at the discrepancies now, or they are going to lose a new fanbase in half the major league cities over the next decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB baseball want teams to win. Boston is not a major market never has been. Where was Boston 15 years ago. Last place. When owners want to spend money there revenues go up. It's that simple. Every owner in baseball has money. Some choose not to spend it. The Yankees for instance don't make a profit. Or only a marginal profit each year. They would rather win then make a dollar. Unlike the 30 other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the other major sports have a salary cap. IMO, there is no valid argument for not having a salary cap, thus creating a competitive balance. The big money teams can just run wild.

Much like College Football getting a playoff, I think eventually people will force the issue and MLB will have a cap.

Well the problem with a cap in baseball is it really will not fix things, yet. The Yanks have just an incredibly greater amount of money to work with. They would simply buy every decent international prospect out there and every signability prospect. They would end up with the best farm system and the best cheap players, thus being able to still buy the stars.

What I have never understood is how baseball never adjusted its' revenue model for the reality of modern media. When the gate was all you had, sharing was less important. However the fact that NY is the biggest TV market should not put other teams at such a disadvantage, there is not game on TV without the other team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that increased revenue sharing is the answer. The problem is the Players Union and the large market clubs have such a significant influence in shaping the CBA that we will not likely see anything close to parity in payroll in the near future.

Without this, I think increasing the number playoff teams is the best way to go. Sure, the purists would hate it, but we added the DH and the wildcard years ago. The game is nothing like it was in the past anyway. Allowing more teams to get into the postseason would provide more hope to franchises and greater appeal to the more casual fans in those cities. This could help broaden the games appeal. The Yankees may be able to buy a postseason birth each year, but with more teams getting a crack at them in a short series, the playing field would become a more level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Way back during the "reserve clause" days there was no such thing as free agents switching teams for the highest bidder. You would think there would have been parity then but not so. Some teams were just awful decade after decade and teams like the Yankees dominated. Most teams were run just good enough to think that just maybe next year will be their turn.

Today, nearly every year some small or mid market team breaks through for a special season. Same same.

The one big negative of course is the expense for the average fan is far too high. The other major sports have that exact same problem even though they have a salary cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Most quality major league starter's hold their velocity throughout their starts. They may cruise for a bit, but have it when they want it. Typically command goes long before velocity.
    • Do we not want to throw a left hander and take advantage of the spacious left field?
    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
    • There are several advantages to a head first slide.    With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker. When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it. You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag.  Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 
    • Briefly, here is the method I use with a DirecTV DVR for all sorts of timing in football analysis: 1. From a recording on your DVR, hit pause at some point shortly before the ball is released by the pitcher 2. While still on pause, use the FF button to advance the video 1 "frame" at a time.  On 1080i, the screen is redrawn 30 times per second, so each click is 1/30th of a second.  On 720p or 1080p, it's 60 frames per second.  So timing should be accurate to either 1/30th (0.033) or 1/60th (0.017) of a second 3. Advance the video to the point of contact--It is easy to go forward, but difficult to go backward, so you need to advance slowly to fin the closest point 4. From that point, count the number of FF clicks until Gunnar hits 3rd base, you should actually be able to see the image move with each click, so it's easier to count these than you might think 5. Divide clicks counted by 30 to get seconds for the event.  For example, if you get 322 clicks, it's 10 and 22/30 seconds (10.73 sec).  This assumes the MASN broadcast is in 1080i. I've been using this method for more than 15 years and you can confirm calibration with an NFL game where the clock is on the screen.  Since you don't have that in baseball, you just have to know whether it's 30 or 60 clicks per second and you'll know that by whether it's an 11 or 22-second triple.
    • Wait, Drungo isn't allowed to make jokes? I thought that post was hilarious given the context. I think better of him for it, though I've always thought highly of him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...