Jump to content

Louis Angelos sells Peter’s Law Firm to himself per The Baltimore Sun


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Relocation is not in the cards.

I haven't followed it all enough.  From a logical perspective given the history, market type, and others who should/would relocate first, I don't think they would ever move.  But given the leagues disdain for the team (hopefully more specifically the family) and the whole masn situation, I could see some shady business  happening somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, paullwaull said:

I haven't followed it all enough.  From a logical perspective given the history, market type, and others who should/would relocate first, I don't think they would ever move.  But given the leagues disdain for the team (hopefully more specifically the family) and the whole masn situation, I could see some shady business  happening somehow.

So, you think the league has disdain for the team but would then approve them to move?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

This story fills me with trepidation.  For decades many of us wanted Angelos to sell the team and stop his meddling.  Now however with the minor leagues humming like a well oiled machine and seeminly Elias is doing amazing the thought of changing owners makes me fear they would remove Elias and we could have more decades of misery.  

Things could always get worse with an ownership change.  

Edited by Gurgi
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From that Sun article archive. I don't see how Lou will get away with this. Sounds like a loose cannon to say the least. And his mom Georgia sounds like a sharp litigator herself.  

"On June 8, the day before he filed his suit, Louis Angelos sent a letter through his lawyer to his mother saying that as his father’s agent, he had transferred the firm’s outstanding stock to himself. He attached documents that included Peter Angelos’ resignation from the law firm, which he signed as his father’s agent, and a purchase agreement that he also signed on his father’s behalf, selling the firm to himself in exchange for a promissory note.

Georgia Angelos’ suit said that “of course” Louis Angelos cannot act as his father’s agent because Peter Angelos transferred his power of attorney to his wife. Their sons are successor co-agents who would take over only if Georgia Angelos cannot fulfill her responsibilities.
 
“The transaction was not a sale at all; it was a theft, pure and simple,” her petition stated."
Edited by NashLumber
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am starting to think Lou is cash poor and was depending on the rumored sale of the Orioles.  But it seems John and his mother were unwilling to sell just yet and Lou seems desperate for money from the sale and is attempting to force their hands.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gurgi said:

I am starting to think Lou is cash poor and was depending on the rumored sale of the Orioles.  But it seems John and his mother were unwilling to sell just yet and Lou seems desperate for money from the sale and is attempting to force their hands.  

Maybe a settlement would be a fake O's Vice President position invented for Lou.  Wouldn't have to force him to get a job.  Gasp!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Maybe a settlement would be a fake O's Vice President position invented for Lou.  Wouldn't have to force him to get a job.  Gasp!

He could have moved into that position after Brady Anderson was dismissed, right? 😉

Edited by NashLumber
wink added
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t read this article behind the paywall, but I do want to explain, for anyone who doesn’t know, that non-lawyers cannot own any equity interest in a law firm in Maryland.  Hence, neither Georgia nor John (who has a law degree but apparently never passed the bar) is capable of owning any part of the law firm.   I don’t understand what authority Lou has to sell the firm on Peter’s behalf, or why the key lawyers in the firm would accept Lou having all the equity when he’s not the lawyer or force of nature that his father was.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I can’t read this article behind the paywall, but I do want to explain, for anyone who doesn’t know, that non-lawyers cannot own any equity interest in a law firm in Maryland.  Hence, neither Georgia nor John (who has a law degree but apparently never passed the bar) is capable of owning any part of the law firm.   I don’t understand what authority Lou has to sell the firm on Peter’s behalf, or why the key lawyers in the firm would accept Lou having all the equity when he’s not the lawyer or force of nature that his father was.  

Archived link if you want to read it:

https://archive.ph/AdPAb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I can’t read this article behind the paywall, but I do want to explain, for anyone who doesn’t know, that non-lawyers cannot own any equity interest in a law firm in Maryland.  Hence, neither Georgia nor John (who has a law degree but apparently never passed the bar) is capable of owning any part of the law firm.   I don’t understand what authority Lou has to sell the firm on Peter’s behalf, or why the key lawyers in the firm would accept Lou having all the equity when he’s not the lawyer or force of nature that his father was.  

I have a feeling there isn't much of a law practice left of value to own.  This is another bizarre twist in this saga.  I would think any of the lawyers with loyal clients will bolt from this drama.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think yesterday was the nail in the coffin for him being on the playoff roster, assuming we make it.
    • I feel that way, too. I keep thinking about 2005.  2005: 10 games over .500 on June 20th. 1st place, two games up.  Shortly after they went on a 2-16 skid, and their last game at .500 was at the the start of that awful home 4 game series in late July when the White Sox swept them, and Raffy was exposed as taking PEDs. They fell under .500 that series and kept on sinking.  2024: 24 games over .500 on June 20th. 2nd place, a half game back.  Then immediately lose five straight. Due to their great start, they can't finish 14 under .500, but the dive feels eerily similar with all of the injuries, dormant bats, and all happening at the same time of year.  The floor coming out from underneath them feels a lot like it. That team was cooked by late July and by the first week of August, Mazzilli got the axe. That won't happen with Hyde this time, as they had a fine start this year, but this can't happen two years in a row under him. 
    • I know …. Gotcha. Trade away Stowers & Norby for Garbage and pick up Rivera & Jiminez. And be surprised when you offense stinks. 
    • You could cut and paste this write up for about every team in the organization. 
    • It’s because the strategies that they are taught and employ work much better in the minors with pitchers with worse stuff and command than in the majors.  This, in turn, inflates their minor league stats.  The good news is that thus far after an adjustment period those players do seem to adjust and do well. 
    • This was the lineup today: The problem is injuries. Hyde didn't have to run out this sort of lineup in May or June. You can nitpick about whether these were the right nine to start, but these are the players on the roster right now and it's because guys who were here in the winning months are not available.
    • I think you agree Roy. The injuries are one thing, but combining them with the continual influx of rookies/ near-rookies - (as promising as they may be) creates instability.  Holliday, Cowser, Mayo, Norby, Kjerstad, Povich, even Stowers.  The past two years: Rutschman and Henderson. One rookie, a solid unremarkable, yet reliable core that had been playing together for several years. Maybe Elias needs to answer for this. I’m not buying the injury excuse for position players. The pitching - amazing job for the injury plague (Kimbrel not included). Have to wonder if these injuries have something to do with the training staff don’t you?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...