Jump to content

Orioles potential SP target: Chris Bassitt profile


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Is Bassitt worth 4/75?

 

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Probably not

 

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Sort of depends on what pitchers are going to cost from here on out.  Everything’s relative.   

With the way free agent starting pitching costs, I could see 4/$75 being reasonable for Bassitt. With as many looks as he gives hitters, i think he has a great chance to keep it up into late 30's.

Is there risk, sure, but for me, Bassitt is the guy I like the best for the cost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

 

 

With the way free agent starting pitching costs, I could see 4/$75 being reasonable for Bassitt. With as many looks as he gives hitters, i think he has a great chance to keep it up into late 30's.

Is there risk, sure, but for me, Bassitt is the guy I like the best for the cost. 

I'd rather do 4/$75 for Bassit than 4/$60 for Ubaldo in 2014 dollars. That being said, the Ubaldo deal did not work out for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I'd rather do 4/$75 for Bassit than 4/$60 for Ubaldo in 2014 dollars. That being said, the Ubaldo deal did not work out for us.

Ubaldo just had too many statistical red flags and was just a bad signing from the beginning. It was probably one of Duquette's worse moves as GM.

Bassitt is the opposite. Everything points to him being good over the next few years if he stays healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Eflin's youth and effectiveness in October relief gave him a higher profile with Clubs than the general public.    I agree Bassitt's probably trying for four or more, but know ESPN Kiley McDaniel's guesses were three years for both of them.

The Bassitt camp might want to gain a view of the deGrom outcome as not hard to imagine NYM adjusting their offer depending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be happy if the Orioles signed Bassitt at 4/$75M. Of course, I do think that would be an overpay, but I think it would be a worthwhile overpay. I agree with folks that are concerned we would be paying for his age 34-37 seasons. That's worrisome, but I do have confidence he'll at least live up to the contract in years 1 and 2. It's years 3-4 that he probably won't. I would much prefer a 2 or even 3 year deal, but I would be onboard with a 4-year contract for Bassitt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s the 4th year for Bassitt. I tend to agree that his chances of being effective as he gets older are pretty decent but I don’t love him for 4 years.

 

I don’t either, but I’m getting a bit sick of waiting around for a good pitcher on a favorable contract to somehow fall into our laps.   I’m more focused on the “good pitcher” part now.   If Bassitt’s unproductive in 2026, we’ll have to figure it out then.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t either, but I’m getting a bit sick of waiting around for a good pitcher on a favorable contract to somehow fall into our laps.   I’m more focused on the “good pitcher” part now.   If Bassitt’s unproductive in 2026, we’ll have to figure it out then.  

I remember when Peter Angelos basically didn't want to sign a free agent pitcher. Then the fun physical. Who was the pitcher awhile back who they withdrew the offer after the physical? Maybe was too. Aaron Sele?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

I remember when Peter Angelos basically didn't want to sign a free agent pitcher. Then the fun physical. Who was the pitcher awhile back who they withdrew the offer after the physical? Maybe was too. Aaron Sele?

Grant Balfour got his offer reduced.  I think we had at least one other incident.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

I remember when Peter Angelos basically didn't want to sign a free agent pitcher. Then the fun physical. Who was the pitcher awhile back who they withdrew the offer after the physical? Maybe was too. Aaron Sele?

Sele was one.  Grant Balfour was another.   We renegotiated Gallardo’s deal after his physical.  Did that with one of the Korean pitchers we signed too.  I may be forgetting one other.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I don’t either, but I’m getting a bit sick of waiting around for a good pitcher on a favorable contract to somehow fall into our laps.   I’m more focused on the “good pitcher” part now.   If Bassitt’s unproductive in 2026, we’ll have to figure it out then.  

And that’s why I would probably give him the 4th year.  I just won’t like it.

Of course, if he flops, it shouldn’t matter but it will to this ownership.  That’s my concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...