Jump to content

How Will The Shift Affect Pitchers' Value?


Pickles

Recommended Posts

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I feel like this is a question we haven't discussed too much.  We have talked about how it will affect batter and fielder value quite a bit, and personally, I think  those questions are pretty straight forward and the answer comes down to gradation.

However, how the shift will affect pitchers seems far more unclear to me.  Generally, with the new clock, bags, and shift rules, I think it is going to increase offense, but that's true across the board for all pitchers.  What I am interested in is who is going to gain relative value?

If LH hitters gain an advantage, and that seems to me to be the primary beneficiaries of the change, doesn't that make LHP more valuable than before?  Or not?

If middle infield defense will  be prioritized, doesn't that benefit ground ball pitchers more?  Or not?  Because weren't they gaining even more of an advantage before?

Just some questions to ponder, which can of course also be applied to team composition and player acquisition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I did hear Scott Servais the Mariners manager on the radio today. He talked about how much more important range for a second basemen is now. 

That, and to a lesser extent SS, and the advantage to LHH seems the most obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I have to think that 5/6 will get more competitive, at least. 
    • I have not seen any reports of a limit on the number of qualifying offers a team can make.   I disagree that Santander is unlikely to receive a QO, or that he will accept it if he gets one.  Of course, it depends how the rest of his season plays out.  But I’ve been on record that if Santander has a season as good as the last two (120/121 OPS+), he should get a QO and will turn it down.  Right now he’s at 131 OPS+, so we’ll see how it goes from here.  
    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...