Jump to content

Poll: Do you like the Adam Frazier signing?


Tony-OH

Do you like the Frazier signing?  

148 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think signing Frazier to a 1 yr/ $8 million contract was good or not?

    • Yes, It was good
    • No, it was not good


Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, George Zuverink said:

The voting on this poll reminded me of the voting in the 2020 and 2022 elections  with distinct differences between early and late in the day voting. When I voted early in the day, it was almost 80% “not good” and 20% “good.” I was part of that almost silent minority. Now it’s about 68%/32%. 

I don't ever remember it being 80/20, but either way, I think were starting to see the people who just want it to be good coming on and voting for, vs informed decisions posters in the against. I could be wrong, but I don't know a lot of the names in the for, vs knowing almost all of the names in the against.

Either way, everyone is allowed their opinion and I respect all the posters willing to make a call and go on record. At this point, we just have to wait and see.

I'll be honest though, I'd rather be wrong on this then right because I don't root for any Oriole to fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right Tony, my decision to vote FOR in this poll may not be "an informed decision" but it's my decision because I'm going to lean toward rooting for any signing until that player proves On The Field they were a bad decision. I got to say, I also resent being labeled Uninformed. I think it's time to stop the name calling and labeling.

I"ve been around this site for over 15 years and a plus member on and off. I would dare say there are a number of Oriole Fans that are uninformed or FAN BOYS if you would. I started to ignor this and just take a break but this really ticks off an Old Oriole Fan Boy that is going into his 70th season. So now we know who the "informed" and "uninformed" Oriole fans are at least on this site. I'll wear my badge with honor! All you informed fans put me on ignor cause heck I don't know what the hell I'm talking about.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Too Tall said:

You are right Tony, my decision to vote FOR in this poll may not be "an informed decision" but it's my decision because I'm going to lean toward rooting for any signing until that player proves On The Field they were a bad decision. I got to say, I also resent being labeled Uninformed. I think it's time to stop the name calling and labeling.

I"ve been around this site for over 15 years and a plus member on and off. I would dare say there are a number of Oriole Fans that are uninformed or FAN BOYS if you would. I started to ignor this and just take a break but this really ticks off an Old Oriole Fan Boy that is going into his 70th season. So now we know who the "informed" and "uninformed" Oriole fans are at least on this site. I'll wear my badge with honor! All you informed fans put me on ignor cause heck I don't know what the hell I'm talking about.

 

Too Tall, I didn't say everyone who voted that way was uninformed, but you proved my point in that you say you are for this based on wanting him to be good, not because the value of the deal or stats that say it's a good signing.

While you and everyone else are certainly welcome and to mix it up, we go into very deep detail using all the metrics available to us. Not everyone has the time or desire to get into that detail, and I respect that, but if you seriously are just voting yes because you hope he does well (which 99% of us do), then you kind of prove my point towards the voters that are now voting yes.

I think some of you need to stop saying I'm name calling when I never called you personally anything. You labelled yourself a fanboy and uniformed, not me. 

Now I appreciate your support and everyone else, and we're happy to have all opinions, but the Hangout has always been the big leagues of message boards when it comes to discussion. This has never been the rah-rah never say anything bad about our beloved Orioles site.

So if you say you agree with the folks who like the Frazier signing because you think he'll bounce back, great, but if you vote that way just because you want to like the player or because you just think any move Elias makes is right until proven wrong, well, then you have to take whatever "label" you think fits. At the same time, unless I called you an uniformed fanboy personally, then stop saying I'm calling you names. You are the one taking on those labels, not me giving them to you.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2022 at 11:43 AM, LTO's said:

Why would it be miraculous for him to bounce back? He was an all star a season ago and was solid for basically his entire time with Pittsburgh before that.  Many of the Padres recent acquisitions have struggled initially for whatever reason but it's not even like he was bad there. He had a somewhat crappy year last year but that's more of the outlier than anything. Also, the metrics that are his carrying tools aren't declining.  

His big first half with PIT in 2021 was entirely a BABIP-driven outlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

His big first half with PIT in 2021 was entirely a BABIP-driven outlier.

Don't forget September when his BABIP was .338 and his OPS was .802.      Basically, he had 4 really good months and you will say that they don't mean anything because his BABIP was over his career average in all 4 months.    Of course, we can all see that for the whole season he had a +114 OPS and 3.4 Rwar.   

Spin it any way you want.   Even factoring luck in, he had a good season and finished strong in September.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

Don't forget September when his BABIP was .338 and his OPS was .802.      Basically, he had 4 really good months and you will say that they don't mean anything because his BABIP was over his career average in all 4 months.    Of course, we can all see that for the whole season he had a +114 OPS and 3.4 Rwar.   

Spin it any way you want.   Even factoring luck in, he had a good season and finished strong in September.

His big run in PIT in 2021 was the result of a BABIP spike that exceeded his career average by 50+ points. That is not debatable, the only thing that is debatable is what can be expected from him going forward. Based on his 2022 metrics and bottom line numbers, my guess is not much but a bit more than Odor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

His big run in PIT in 2021 was the result of a BABIP spike that exceeded his career average by 50+ points. That is not debatable, the only thing that is debatable is what can be expected from him going forward. Based on his 2022 metrics and bottom line numbers, my guess is not much but a bit more than Odor. 

What kind of first half would he have had if his BABIP was his career average.   It still would have been good.   You ding him when his BABIP is above his career average but don't give him any ground when it's below.   Interesting.   Last year he had a horrid month when he put about 80 balls in play and had a .154 BABIP.   Unlucky?

Even last year when he was poor he had two full months in the low 700's.   He's had some terrible months for sure in the last 1 1/2 years but he's had other months which suggest he hasn't completely lost it.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

What kind of first half would he have had if his BABIP was his career average.   It still would have been good.   You ding him when his BABIP is above his career average but don't give him any ground when it's below.   Interesting.   Last year he had a horrid month when he put about 80 balls in play and had a .154 BABIP.   Unlucky?

Even last year when he was poor he had two full months in the low 700's.   He's had some terrible months for sure in the last 1 1/2 years but he's had other months which suggest he hasn't completely lost it.

I see a lot of people using "stats" like a drunk uses a lamppost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

The metrics are not particularly encouraging, but maybe we'll get lucky and he'll have another outlier like his 2021 first half. 

It's reasonable to look at his whole career and see that he's only had one BAD season.  That was 2022.    Even adjusting for luck, he had a good 2021 and finished with an .802 OPS in September that year.    So, you keep ignoring that fact because it doesn't fit your agenda.    He had a bad July and August in 2021.   That's more accurate but it doesn't really mean anything unless you ignore September and say he just got bad all of a sudden when he left Pittsburgh and it's magic waters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...