Jump to content

Michael Baumann 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

The 113.3 EV he just yielded on Arozarena's HR was more than any Oriole Bat was able to manage in 2022 (in the major leagues, at least).

But he completed 2 innings behind Bradish otherwise okay.    Certainly Baumann for me is someone whose dial is turned to Yield HR, not Walks, even apart from that being generically what the Orioles have done in recent years to complete ~1425 innings.

Anyhow, I don't really have any hope for him as more than a 1-inning fireballer, but I am curious to see him get a crack at the Tommy Hunter life change.

To dunk on myself, here was some irrational exuberance from a scant 27 months ago.    Baumann whistled past the surgeon's table graveyard, but results wise I don't feel like he ever got all of whatever he used to have back after whatever it was they've been nursing him through the last couple years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

The 113.3 EV he just yielded on Arozarena's HR was more than any Oriole Bat was able to manage in 2022 (in the major leagues, at least).

But he completed 2 innings behind Bradish otherwise okay.    Certainly Baumann for me is someone whose dial is turned to Yield HR, not Walks, even apart from that being generically what the Orioles have done in recent years to complete ~1425 innings.

Anyhow, I don't really have any hope for him as more than a 1-inning fireballer, but I am curious to see him get a crack at the Tommy Hunter life change.

To dunk on myself, here was some irrational exuberance from a scant 27 months ago.    Baumann whistled past the surgeon's table graveyard, but results wise I don't feel like he ever got all of whatever he used to have back after whatever it was they've been nursing him through the last couple years.

 

Three innings, but who’s counting? Well, apparently me. Also, freakin Arozarena! The bat speed is a blur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CharmCityHokie said:

Struck out the side with the bases loaded at that...not shabby after a rocky start

Nice job by Baumann but who were the three guys he struck out.  We need to see the B pitchers against a full ML lineup later in the spring.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Nice job by Baumann but who were the three guys he struck out.  We need to see the B pitchers against a full ML lineup later in the spring.  

I absolutely agree with that, but two of his K's were Harold Ramirez swinging and Francisco Mejia called. They're not superstars but they have MLB tenure, it wasn't all 19 year old A-ballers. When you have the bases loaded with no outs and get out of it without giving up a run or even allowing a ball in play, that's pretty impressive. Or basically the 'reverse-Oriole'd'; I feel like the last few years we've squandered so many no-out RISP chances it makes me cringe. 

That all being said, I don't know have a ton of faith in Baumann, he brings heat but every time I've seen him the fastball has no movement, big leaguers will destroy that no matter how hard you throw it. I'm hoping for the best but don't anticipate him being more than a middle reliever. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Eh, I don't really know what to make of STUFF+, but what I do know is that his fastball is not much different than the one he used last year minus about an inch LESS of vertical movement. Yet batters put up a .376 XWOBA and a 46.6% Hard hit percentage against the pitch last year. 

So while STUFF+ may give him high grades this spring, major league hitters don't seem to be too impressed. I think STUFF+ probably has a long way to go before it's should be used in any meaningful evaluation of a major league pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Eh, I don't really know what to make of STUFF+, but what I do know is that his fastball is not much different than the one he used last year minus about an inch LESS of vertical movement. Yet batters put up a .376 XWOBA and a 46.6% Hard hit percentage against the pitch last year. 

So while STUFF+ may give him high grades this spring, major league hitters don't seem to be too impressed. I think STUFF+ probably has a long way to go before it's should be used in any meaningful evaluation of a major league pitcher.

An inch less vertical drop on the 4-seamer FB is a good thing, right?  Isn't that the 'ride' or 'hop' that messes with batters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

Right, thanks for clarifying.  Obviously, some cross currents (pros/cons) for Baumann but that's something.  That would put him around the 90th percentile.

I just don't think a little bit better vertical movement is going to suddenly give him a top 5 four seamer. I just really question the STUFF+ for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls. The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...