Jump to content

I can't get over how much Angelos has killed off the fanbase


Greenpastures23

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Well, there are two main factors: (1) performance the previous season, which tends to drive season ticket sales, and (2) performance in the current season, which drives walk-up sales.   I believe Going Underground reported that he heard season ticket sales were up, but only modestly.  So, it really depends on whether the O’s play well this year so that walk-up is good.   

Well, we saw the increase last year even in season so we know winning leads to more butts in the seats.

If this team is competitive all year- as I predict they will be- and they don't draw 2 million, or close, fans than we might have to wonder if the other effects on attendance besides just winning- issues we are familiar with involving the city, demographics being drawn to baseball, people staying home to watch on TV, etc.- are stronger than we know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Well, we saw the increase last year even in season so we know winning leads to more butts in the seats.

If this team is competitive all year- as I predict they will be- and they don't draw 2 million, or close, fans than we might have to wonder if the other effects on attendance besides just winning- issues we are familiar with involving the city, demographics being drawn to baseball, people staying home to watch on TV, etc.- are stronger than we know.

I think it’s highly unlikely the O’s get anywhere close to 2 mm this year.  Last year they were at 1.368 mm.   They’ve never had a jump of more than 350 k since 1996.   I think it would take at least two very good years to get back to 2 mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I think it’s highly unlikely the O’s get anywhere close to 2 mm this year.  Last year they were at 1.368 mm.   They’ve never had a jump of more than 350 k since 1996.   I think it would take at least two very good years to get back to 2 mm.

I guess that's kind of my point/concern.  This team drew over 2 million in 2007 after nine straight losing seasons.  They topped 2 million in 2012 after 14 consecutive losing seasons.

If they can't get to 2 million this year then the team's fanbase has been permanently reduced in a way that even winning won't solve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I guess that's kind of my point/concern.  This team drew over 2 million in 2007 after nine straight losing seasons.  They topped 2 million in 2012 after 14 consecutive losing seasons.

If they can't get to 2 million this year then the team's fanbase has been permanently reduced in a way that even winning won't solve.

Tanking as hard as they did for as long as they did is not without risks when it comes to alienating the casual part of the fanbase. I wouldn't expect an immediate rebound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, deward said:

Tanking as hard as they did for as long as they did is not without risks when it comes to alienating the casual part of the fanbase. I wouldn't expect an immediate rebound.

Was the tank worse than 14 years of losing?

For me it was nowhere near as bad.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, interloper said:

Not even close. The team had literally no plan for nearly 20 years. TWENTY YEAARRRRRSSSSS

That's not true.

They had many plans over those twenty years.

They just weren't good plans for the most part.

Jury is still out on exactly what the current plan is or how successful it will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's not true.

They had many plans over those twenty years.

They just weren't good plans for the most part.

Jury is still out on exactly what the current plan is or how successful it will be.

Well, it's already proven to be a better plan than any of those other plans, as they managed to win 81 games.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

That's not true.

They had many plans over those twenty years.

They just weren't good plans for the most part.

Jury is still out on exactly what the current plan is or how successful it will be.

Signing Jamie Walker to a 3/$12 million contract for his age 35-38 seasons was certainly plan, that's for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

Not even close. The team had literally no plan for nearly 20 years. TWENTY YEAARRRRRSSSSS

I think the absolute nadir for me was Chris Ray blowing some save against the NYY in 2007 right before MacPhail was hired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pickles said:

I think the absolute nadir for me was Chris Ray blowing some save against the NYY in 2007 right before MacPhail was hired.

I was at the game he (and others) blew on Mother's Day in Boston. Absolutely brutal. And everyone saw it coming MILES away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

Signing Jamie Walker to a 3/$12 million contract for his age 35-38 seasons was certainly plan, that's for sure. 

Hey it takes some doing to get four years out of a three year contract.  Have to give them credit for that at least.

Andy pretty clearly had a plan and it wasn't that bad of one.  If he could have gotten over the buscones...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, interloper said:

I was at the game he (and others) blew on Mother's Day in Boston. Absolutely brutal. And everyone saw it coming MILES away. 

That whole first half of 2007 was just an epic kick in the balls.  It was the final nail in the coffin of any hope of competing without a long and hard rebuild.

I was happy with the hiring Andy MacPhail, as it at least signalled a clear direction.

Edited by Pickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Hey it takes some doing to get four years out of a three year contract.  Have to give them credit for that at least.

Andy pretty clearly had a plan and it wasn't that bad of one.  If he could have gotten over the buscones...

Lol alright wise guy. 35-37*

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Was the tank worse than 14 years of losing?

For me it was nowhere near as bad.

I had a harder time with a team that was purposefully unwatchable vs teams that tried and failed. At no point in those 14 years were those teams as hopelessly non-competitive as in the tanking years. I watched nearly every game in those earlier years, I didn't even bother turning them on most of the time in 2021.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...