Jump to content

Framber Valdez vs everyone else


Billy F-Face3

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Frobby said:

If you look at Valdez’s Baseball Savant page, he really didn’t do a lot well in 2023 except induce ground balls.   He was in the 3rd percentile for average exit velocity, and 6th for hard hit rate.  His xERA was 4.33, about a run higher than in 2022.  

This is exactly the point I made earlier about him having red flags in his pitching profile. My hunch is that when things go bad for Valdez, they're going to go REALLY bad. Now will that be next season? Who knows, but he's already 30 and as he gets older I think it's fair to say that the risk of that happening increases exponentially 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

So you think a career WHIP of 1.22 is good for an ace? Because it's not. Especially for one who doesn't have control issues. That's what I'm talking out!!!

Cease had a higher whip then that in 4 out of the 5 years so far.   Cease had 1 outstanding years and strikes guys out and misses bats but that about it.  2022 season just looks too much like an outlier for me to give up what the White Sox think he is worth.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Cease had a higher whip then that in 4 out of the 5 years so far.   Cease had 1 outstanding years and strikes guys out and misses bats but that about it.  2022 season just looks too much like an outlier for me to give up what the White Sox think he is worth.  

I never said Cease was an ace and you (and we) have no idea what the White Sox are asking for him. That said, I think it is reasonable to expect Valdez to cost more than Cease so it’s not an apples to apples comparison. I’d rather have a less expensive Cease over an older more expensive pitcher who pitches to contact and who has outperformed his expected numbers nearly every season. And when I use the word expensive I’m talking about the prospect cost to trade for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

I never said Cease was an ace and you (and we) have no idea what the White Sox are asking for him. That said, I think it is reasonable to expect Valdez to cost more than Cease so it’s not an apples to apples comparison. I’d rather have a less expensive Cease over an older more expensive pitcher who pitches to contact and who has outperformed his expected numbers nearly every season. And when I use the word expensive I’m talking about the prospect cost to trade for them. 

How does Valdez pitch to contact when he strikes out a hitter per inning and his whiff percentage is in the 56 percentile?   If he outperforms his expected numbers maybe there is something to it.   Also, you keep acting like 30 is old for a pitcher.    Prove it.

The only good point you make is that he might be more expensive BUT even there I’m not sure.  The WS can wait to trade Cease and need to make a killing on the trade to justify it.  The new GM Getz needs a deal that makes him look good.  The Astros motivation in trading Valdez is reportedly financial so they don’t want to wait and they might not drive as hard a bargain to move his salary.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

 Also, you keep acting like 30 is old for a pitcher.  

30 is barely half way through a good pitcher's Major League career. Heck, Jamie Moyer pitched until he was 49. 

Legendary Hall Of Famer Satchel Paige didn't retire until he was 2 weeks shy of his 60th birthday and he had a career ERA of 2.70.

Justin Verlander won the Cy Young at 39 years old. He's almost 41 with a February birthday now so we may as well take the liberty of embellishment and say he was almost 40 when he won the Cy Young.

 

There are far more variables that determine a pitcher's future ability & production than just their age number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HakunaSakata said:

I never said Cease was an ace 

Fine, but nobody said Valdez was an ace, either.  So when you said his WHIP was high, there was no reason to read that as “high for an ace.”  Of 73 pitchers who have thrown 600+ innings since Valdez entered the league, Valdez is exactly at the median at no. 37.  Cease is 55th at 1.31.  https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&type=1&month=0&ind=0&sortcol=10&sortdir=default&startdate=&enddate=&season1=2018&season=2023&qual=600&pagenum=2&pageitems=30. Mind you, the >600 innings group is already a group of mostly above average pitchers, or they wouldn’t have had the opportunity to throw 600 innings.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

If you look at Valdez’s Baseball Savant page, he really didn’t do a lot well in 2023 except induce ground balls.   He was in the 3rd percentile for average exit velocity, and 6th for hard hit rate.  His xERA was 4.33, about a run higher than in 2022.  

If you look at his last 3 years of statcast data, he didn't do a lot well, except put up 1.8/4.4./4.3  fWAR seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

30 is barely half way through a good pitcher's Major League career. Heck, Jamie Moyer pitched until he was 49. 

Legendary Hall Of Famer Satchel Paige didn't retire until he was 2 weeks shy of his 60th birthday and he had a career ERA of 2.70.

Justin Verlander won the Cy Young at 39 years old. He's almost 41 with a February birthday now so we may as well take the liberty of embellishment and say he was almost 40 when he won the Cy Young.

 

There are far more variables that determine a pitcher's future ability & production than just their age number.

These are pretty big outliers, but I agree overall that 30 isn't that old for a pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

Again, it’s posters thinking who they want to trade versus what the other team would really want.  If the idea is to shed salary you don’t take back two bench players making 5M.

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

I misread your post. Sorry.  Still, Houston’s farm system is depleted.   They are going to want to maximize the young talent coming back whereas you seem to want to include Mateo or Urias to lessen the young talent we would be sending.

Bingo! (Continuing from the discussion from the other thread into this appropriate Valdez thread)...

Houston is said to have a very depleted farm system and their main priority with it is to restock it now while they prepare for contracts of key players getting ready to expire. Valdez might get a decent return and is much more expendable than a franchise player Lance Berkman or Kyle Tucker, etc.  The salary dump is within their calculus, but it's kind of secondary to the farm system, in my estimation. 

An Astros official is also on the record responding to a reporter asking about  the possibility of Valdez being traded and his reaction was "We're trying to win here." I take that to mean that in order for them to be enticed into trading him, they're going to need a Major League ready starting pitcher to plug into their rotation as part of the trade deal. For us, this probably takes the top minor league pitchers out of consideration for the trade package. Based on that, we are looking more along the lines of a Tyler Wells, Cole Irvin, Dean Kremer, or DL Hall to get a deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/22/2023 at 4:52 AM, dystopia said:

These are pretty big outliers, but I agree overall that 30 isn't that old for a pitcher.

Well 30 is kinda old relative to the age of the other SPs who have been rumored to be on the trade block. And between the outliers that you mentioned and the fact that he doesn't throw that hard (for this era) I have more questions about how Valdez's pitching profile will age more than the others. Yes guys like Scherzer and Verlander have been successful late in their careers, but they also throw considerably harder and have better strikeout numbers than Valdez. The other poster mentioned Jamie Moyer when discussing pitchers who have had career longevity. I'd personally prefer to trade for a guy like Burnes or Cease, if they cost less rather than a more proven pitcher like Valdez with red flags who will probably cost more. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Well 30 is kinda old relative to the age of the other SPs who have been rumored to be on the trade block. And between the outliers that you mentioned and the fact that he doesn't throw that hard (for this era) I have more questions about how Valdez's pitching profile will age more than the others. Yes guys like Scherzer and Verlander have been successful late in their careers, but they also throw considerably harder and have better strikeout numbers than Valdez. The other poster mentioned Jamie Moyer when discussing pitchers who have had career longevity. I'd personally prefer to trade for a guy like Burnes or Cease, if they cost less rather than a more proven pitcher like Valdez with red flags who will probably cost more. 

 

I’d worry about this if we were signing a guy for 4-6 years.  I wouldn’t worry about with in a trade for a guy with two years of service time remaining.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Well 30 is kinda old relative to the age of the other SPs who have been rumored to be on the trade block. And between the outliers that you mentioned and the fact that he doesn't throw that hard (for this era) I have more questions about how Valdez's pitching profile will age more than the others. Yes guys like Scherzer and Verlander have been successful late in their careers, but they also throw considerably harder and have better strikeout numbers than Valdez. The other poster mentioned Jamie Moyer when discussing pitchers who have had career longevity. I'd personally prefer to trade for a guy like Burnes or Cease, if they cost less rather than a more proven pitcher like Valdez with red flags who will probably cost more. 

 

According to Baseball Savant, Valdez avg fastball velocity was 95.3 in 2023.  Corbin Burnes was 95.3.  Dylan Cease was 95.6.   Now, what were you saying about him not throwing hard?

Statcast data for Verlander only goes back to 2015 when his fastball, at age 32 averaged 93.4.   His highest fastball average in that time was 95.3!  In 2017.  Scherzers highest average velocity in any year dating back to 2015 was in 2016 when he averaged 95.0.  Now, what were you saying about Verlander and Scherzer throwing “considerably” harder?

 

Edited by RZNJ
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

According to Baseball Savant, Valdez avg fastball velocity was 95.3 in 2023.  Corbin Burnes was 95.3.  Dylan Cease was 95.6.   Now, what were you saying about him not throwing hard?

Statcast data for Verlander only goes back to 2015 when his fastball, at age 32 averaged 93.4.   His highest fastball average in that time was 95.3!  In 2017.  Scherzers highest average velocity in any year dating back to 2015 was in 2016 when he averaged 95.0.  Now, what were you saying about Verlander and Scherzer throwing “considerably” harder?

 

Biggest difference I see between those three is their extension. 
Burnes 6.6 

Cease 6.3 

Valdez 5.9 

Those fastballs play very differently.  Can’t wait to see what Yamamoto is.  That’s one of the biggest difference in how they teach pitching over there.  In videos it crazy how far away from rubber he gets.  They are taught to take 7 steps (heel to toe), make a mark, and try to land  7 steps away from rubber.  5.9 is pretty bad unless he has some really small feet :) 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...