Jump to content

Questions that need to be answered during the 2024 season


wildcard

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I think we’ll need to trade for another Burnes like pitcher next winter.   Or sign one but even with new ownership I think that’s doubtful.  I think Cowser is the future LF if he hits.   Holliday is the 2B.   Westburg is the most likely choice for 3B.  That leaves Stowers/Mayo/Kerstad/Basallo as leading candidates for RF and 1B.  I’ve got my money on Basallo at 1B.

As far as CF, it’s just a question if Bradfield, Etzel, or Tavera are ready by OD 2026.   We should have a better idea by September.

 

If Cowser can play left field in Camden then he can probably play center.  But I have to see it to believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

If Cowser can play left field in Camden then he can probably play center.  But I have to see it to believe it.

Would you want Hays in CF full time?  I wouldn’t.  Cowser can play CF but I don’t think he becomes the regular CF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will the real Mounty stand up?  If this is it, then he's a core contributor.

Will Holliday figure the 2B thing out?  He'll hit.  Who else will get a shot?

Can Hays find 2nd gear and hold off Cowser?  Does Cowser make Hays a platoon option at best?

Does Santa force a QO offer?

Who's the SP we aquire by the deadline?  What about RP?

Is 2024 The Year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Try and convince the Tides of that.

You can give up 10 runs and lose, you can't win if you don't score.

And good luck convincing Hyde of that. Defense and pitching is key. Always has been, always will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Would you want Hays in CF full time?  I wouldn’t.  Cowser can play CF but I don’t think he becomes the regular CF.

I wouldn't put Hicks in center but Elias did last year and they won 101 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Funny how Mounty went from short side platoon, trade candidate, non tender possibility to current and future Oriole 1B so quickly.  LOL

He's polarizing for sure.  Always tantalizing with the HH% and analytics but underwhelming back off the card stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

You keep repeating this.  He seldom plays OF but just how bad do you think he is in RF?   

The example holds.  Sometimes the math indicates the increase in offensive potential is worth the hit to defense.

Teams don't just consider defense.  Run prevention is only part of the game. 

The idea that "you can lose more games with the glove than you can win with the bat" is just wrong. 

Lots of bat first guys had productive careers.

Every player is not going to be good at everything, decisions have to be made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

The example holds.  Sometimes the math indicates the increase in offensive potential is worth the hit to defense.

Teams don't just consider defense.  Run prevention is only part of the game. 

The idea that "you can lose more games with the glove than you can win with the bat" is just wrong. 

Lots of bat first guys had productive careers.

Every player is not going to be good at everything, decisions have to be made.

I agree.  I think defense is very important to Hyde.  I also thinks he takes other things into account.  Playing O’Hearn in RF doesn’t mean he doesn’t value defense.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

I agree.  I think defense is very important to Hyde.  I also thinks he takes other things into account.  Playing O’Hearn in RF doesn’t mean he doesn’t value defense.

But it does mean that he doesn't overly value defense.

The idea that you have to play plus defense isn't accurate.

Which is what I'm arguing against.

Every manager would rather have plus defenders out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

But it does mean that he doesn't overly value defense.

The idea that you have to play plus defense isn't accurate.

Which is what I'm arguing against.

Every manager would rather have plus defenders out there. 

Semantics.  The other poster said defense and pitching were key with Hyde.   Sounds reasonable to me.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...