Jump to content

Outfield PA the rest of the way


Frobby

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He’s only played there a small amount in the majors.  In the minors, he played CF about 75% of the time.   So, it’s not like he’s inexperienced as a CF.   

The point of contention isn't Cowser's experience, but rather the value of those defensive stats in such a small sample.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

In CF: 

Mullins (624.1 innings): -1 Rtot, -1 Rdrs, +3 OAA, +0.1 UZR

Cowser (152.0 innings): +3 Rtot, +1 Rdrs, +1 OAA, +0.5 UZR

Cowser tops Mullins in 3 of the 4 metrics, and also in the fourth one if you pro-rate it by innings played.  

So, I’m not going to say Cowser is as good or better than Mullins in CF, but where’s the evidence that he isn’t?   The only real evidence is that when they’re both in the field at the same time, Hyde plays Mullins in CF.   But that may be more of a veteran deference thing, or it may reflect, as @Sports Guysaid, that Cowser’s skill set works better than Mullins’ in a corner spot.  Honestly, I couldn’t see Mullins making the throw from the LF wall at all.   And, throwing left-handed is disadvantageous for a LF on a lot of plays Cowser throws right-handed).  
 

The bolded is honestly enough for me.

Hyde said verbatim on Sunday that "Mullins is my best defensive center fielder."

They surely have proprietary stats we are  not privy to, and there's no reason to think they're not better than what he have, and that the O's would go against them if they showed something different.

There's no evidence they do things out of "veteran deference."  If they did, they wouldn't have sat Mullins and Hays as much as they have this year.

BTW, why do you think it's disadvantageous to be LH in LF?  You do have to turn against your body to throw to second, but any ball you're moving towards the line to field is an easier play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 

There's a lot to like about Cowser.  He does a lot of things well.

Unfortunate, he has one giant gaping hole in his game, and it may well be the most important tool.

That said, I want him to play a lot going forward and I still think he can improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pickles said:

 

BTW, why do you think it's disadvantageous to be LH in LF?  You do have to turn against your body to throw to second, but any ball you're moving towards the line to field is an easier play.  

I was mostly thinking about the throwing.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Malike said:

This is good reading.

According to Tom Tango, MLB Senior Database Architect of Stats, expected stats were designed to only be descriptive. If the goal was to be predictive, they would have been designed differently. Expected stats tell you what the likely outcome should have been. They are not predictive so use them accordingly.

Properly Diving Into Expected Stats | Community Blog (fangraphs.com)

I want to make sure I understand. So what these stats refer to is the expected outcome of a play that has already happened? As in, “in this play, we expected X, And Y happened?”

And the only thing we can glean from this information is whether a player has been particularly unlucky or not?

If I’m correct, I don’t see much value in this particular stat, and if I’m still incorrect, or at least incomplete, do you mind filling in what I’m missing?

Because to be honest, when I look at a savant page and see a whole lot of red, I occasionally don’t look much deeper.

Edited by HowAboutThat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HowAboutThat said:

I want to make sure I understand. So what these stats refer to is the expected outcome of a play that has already happened? As in, “in this play as we would have expected X, And Y happened?”

And the only thing we can glean from this information is whether a player has been particularly unlucky or not?

If I’m correct, I don’t see much value in this particular stat, and if I’m still incorrect, or at least incomplete, do you mind filling in what I’m missing?

Because to be honest, when I look at a savant page and see a whole lot of red, I occasionally don’t look much deeper.

Your first paragraph is correct. If you have time you should really read the article I linked, it should answer all of your questions and I'm at work so have really limited time depending on when the next emergency happens or BS drunk annoying call, etc.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mullins is hitting .174 in July with 1 XBH and a 7:1 K/BB ratio. Cowser’s OPS on the season is now .108 points higher and he’s been worth 1.7 more WAR in almost the same number of PA’s.

Deciding who gets more PA’s between the two shouldn’t be that hard. Mullins has a .640 OPS the last calendar year. I’ll take my chances with Cowser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LGOrioles said:

Mullins is hitting .174 in July with 1 XBH and a 7:1 K/BB ratio. Cowser’s OPS on the season is now .108 points higher and he’s been worth 1.7 more WAR in almost the same number of PA’s.

Deciding who gets more PA’s between the two shouldn’t be that hard. Mullins has a .640 OPS the last calendar year. I’ll take my chances with Cowser. 

As I've mentioned previously on this board, Mullins needs to be made into the full-time 4th OF immediately. It's ridiculous that Hyde and Elias have mishandled and benched Kjerstad so much when he's a difference-making bat. And it's also bad roster management to have been benching Cowser more often recently.

Cowser is a fine defensive CF, has clearly better offensive numbers than Mullins, has gotten unlucky, and has good underlying metrics which suggest he has even more offensive upside to tap into. He needs to be this team's full-time CF as soon as possible.

Mullins is a clearly declining player. It's time to make a change. Mullins would be one of the very best 4th OF's in baseball, and can play regularly as a late-game defensive replacement for Kjerstad (pushing Cowser back to LF when Mullins comes into games). Mullins would also be a great pinch-runner for late game situations, making Jorge Mateo even more obsolete after Coby Mayo is called up.

Edited by Brooks The Great
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Cowser had elite batting analytics “red” when he makes contact. The contact is the “blue” part of his baseball savant page. 

Gotta make contact. Contact to damage ratio. Channeling Buck Showalter post game pressers. 

Cowser does K 6.7% more than Mullins but he also walks 4.4% more. Even with the K’s, his OBP is .309 (compared to a laughable .257 for Mullins) and his SLG is .430 (compared to .374 for Mullins). Striking out less isn’t really that much of an argument in favor of Mullins considering his low walk rate and how little damage he does when he makes contact. 

Since May 1st, when Cowser has struggled, he has a 78 wRC+. Mullins has a 75 wRC+ in the last calendar year. There is zero reason to be playing Mullins over Cowser. He has considerably less upside offensively and while Cowser has been going through some rookie struggles the last 2 months, he’s still been better offensively in that time frame than Mullins has been in the last calendar year (which covers 132 games and 451 PA’s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LGOrioles said:

Cowser does K 6.7% more than Mullins but he also walks 4.4% more. Even with the K’s, his OBP is .309 (compared to a laughable .257 for Mullins) and his SLG is .430 (compared to .374 for Mullins). Striking out less isn’t really that much of an argument in favor of Mullins considering his low walk rate and how little damage he does when he makes contact. 

Since May 1st, when Cowser has struggled, he has a 78 wRC+. Mullins has a 75 wRC+ in the last calendar year. There is zero reason to be playing Mullins over Cowser. He has considerably less upside offensively and while Cowser has been going through some rookie struggles the last 2 months, he’s still been better offensively in that time frame than Mullins has been in the last calendar year (which covers 132 games and 451 PA’s).

There’s a million ways to slice and dice this.   Mullins had an abysmal May, so starting with May 1 isn’t doing him any favors.  He rebounded nicely in June, while Cowser really didn’t.  They’re both getting plenty of playing time and I expect that will continue, but right now I’m leaning Mullins until Cowser heats up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There’s a million ways to slice and dice this.   Mullins had an abysmal May, so starting with May 1 isn’t doing him any favors.  He rebounded nicely in June, while Cowser really didn’t.  They’re both getting plenty of playing time and I expect that will continue, but right now I’m leaning Mullins until Cowser heats up.  

I was counting Cowser’s stats since May since that’s when he started struggling. Mullins wRC+ listed was from the last calendar year, so a much larger sample size where he has been struggling even more so than Cowser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LGOrioles said:

Cowser does K 6.7% more than Mullins but he also walks 4.4% more. Even with the K’s, his OBP is .309 (compared to a laughable .257 for Mullins) and his SLG is .430 (compared to .374 for Mullins). Striking out less isn’t really that much of an argument in favor of Mullins considering his low walk rate and how little damage he does when he makes contact. 

Since May 1st, when Cowser has struggled, he has a 78 wRC+. Mullins has a 75 wRC+ in the last calendar year. There is zero reason to be playing Mullins over Cowser. He has considerably less upside offensively and while Cowser has been going through some rookie struggles the last 2 months, he’s still been better offensively in that time frame than Mullins has been in the last calendar year (which covers 132 games and 451 PA’s).

I don't think it is clear at all. They have both been maddeningly inconsistent at the plate. Mullins is coming off an .849 June. They are both under .500 in July. Sharing time makes sense until one or the other establishes consistency. I think Mullins has an edge on defense, Cowser's OBP gives him an edge on offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...