Jump to content

Trevor Rogers 2024


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Ceciltrav said:

True!  I still don't get the price for Soto for the simple fact that Philly was trying to get rid of him.  Johnson was the player they got back for Trey they knew he needed TJ this was his first full year back.  

Also what made me so skeptical of the 2 Philly deals is them pushing out Seranthony and Soto. World series contenders don't get rid of BP pieces if they are good .

Edited by Baseball fandom
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Safelykept said:

Why would you rather have Tanner Scott? I thought our season was cooked for bear

I didn't say that. I have said that once you get in to the tournament, it's a craps shoot. Scott shortens the game and would likely/possible be the closer on this team. Bautista is back next year so the fact that he will be a FA is lessened I think. Just my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The biggest project the Orioles have tasked Rogers with is improving his slider, a pitch he has thrown less often than any other in his repertoire each of the last two seasons. Most notably, Rogers has raised his release point with the pitch by over two inches. While that takes away from his extension — how close to the plate he releases the ball — it also allows the pitch to break more before it reaches the batter.

So far, the results are striking. Opponents are hitting .167 against the pitch while swinging and missing a staggering 48.1% of the time. Over those three quality starts, nobody has touched it. While Rogers’ overall velocity has been down a couple of ticks, Ramsey attributes that to the difference in intensity of pitching in Triple-A compared to the majors. The Orioles are hoping continued tweaks to his delivery can produce improved fastball velocity, which could set up the slider to be a true wipeout pitch."

https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/09/17/orioles-minor-league-report-trevor-rogers-triple-a/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

I didn't say that. I have said that once you get in to the tournament, it's a craps shoot. Scott shortens the game and would likely/possible be the closer on this team. Bautista is back next year so the fact that he will be a FA is lessened I think. Just my opinion. 

Not saying you did,but the board did. Tanner Scott as per board is a no factor. It does not matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MCO'sFan said:

I'd still rather have him this year. Unless Rogers and Soto improve drastically, they won't have any either. 

Or could you get Lucas Erceg for a package of Seth Johnson, Chace, Norby, and Stowers? He could have been a shut down reliever this year and potentially converted to a starter next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Warehouse said:

Or could you get Lucas Erceg for a package of Seth Johnson, Chace, Norby, and Stowers? He could have been a shut down reliever this year and potentially converted to a starter next year.

I'm not familiar with him but I'll take your word for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 7Mo said:

"The biggest project the Orioles have tasked Rogers with is improving his slider, a pitch he has thrown less often than any other in his repertoire each of the last two seasons. Most notably, Rogers has raised his release point with the pitch by over two inches. While that takes away from his extension — how close to the plate he releases the ball — it also allows the pitch to break more before it reaches the batter.

So far, the results are striking. Opponents are hitting .167 against the pitch while swinging and missing a staggering 48.1% of the time. Over those three quality starts, nobody has touched it. While Rogers’ overall velocity has been down a couple of ticks, Ramsey attributes that to the difference in intensity of pitching in Triple-A compared to the majors. The Orioles are hoping continued tweaks to his delivery can produce improved fastball velocity, which could set up the slider to be a true wipeout pitch."

https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/09/17/orioles-minor-league-report-trevor-rogers-triple-a/

I mean, this is encouraging and great to hear some of the adjustments and thank you for posting.

But this really irks me, "While Rogers’ overall velocity has been down a couple of ticks, Ramsey attributes that to the difference in intensity of pitching in Triple-A compared to the majors". His velocity was down prior to being sent down. Either Ramsey wasn't aware of that, which would be unacceptable if so, or he's trying to silver lining things and not focus on the negative to the media. But let's be frank, a soft tossing lefty who wasn't effective as a soft tossing lefty is now an even softer tossing lefty...how realistic is it that this person ends up being a middle or even backend starter?

I'm going through a list of effective starters that live in the low 90s/high 90s, and I'm hard pressed to find anybody that does well barely touching 90. The closest I could find is Trevor Williams who tops out around 89-90. So, I think for Rogers is it isn't just pitch mix re: improving his slider, because all of his pitches have a negative run value, and his slider was the absolute worst this year, but he's gotta get some of that velocity back. His pitches have been barely league average for years now. He hasn't had a pitch with a postive run value over 1 since 2021. That is incredibly concerning. 

I'm more bullish on Povich. But I'm really pulling for Rogers. But I swear if Elias pencils him into the rotation next year in the offseason, I'll lose it.

Edited by LookitsPuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

But this really irks me, "While Rogers’ overall velocity has been down a couple of ticks, Ramsey attributes that to the difference in intensity of pitching in Triple-A compared to the majors". 

This is some classic pitcher-speak head-in-the-sand nonsense. In fairness, they all do it. "I felt great out there but it just didn't go my way", etc. 

Or Cole Irvin after his sudden velocity decrease "I decided to stop focusing on velocity and get back to pitching". 

surejan.gif

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...