Jump to content

Clubhouse issues?


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Just Regular said:

The cameras caught Hyde racing out of the dugout perhaps even before O'Neill touched home.   I don't think that's typical behavior, but I could give a grace if he needed a few extra seconds to be ready for the Holliday play question in the presser about 10 minutes ahead.

Hyde wears his emotions on his sleeve so he probably needed to get out of there because if we're frustrated, you can only imagine how he feels. 

The Holliday error was an absolute back breaker that changed the entire situation from 1st and 3rd with two outs (assuming they would walk O'Neill) and the Red Sox having two lefties coming up against Akin, to 1st and 3rd, one out, and Akin needing to face a lefty masher.

When you're that close to getting away with a win, and your 2nd baseman can't make a simple, routing play, it was frustrating. He can't be seen screaming "WTF" so he ran into the dugout and probably screamed it in there.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Platooning Westburg????   He played in 101 of 109 games before getting hurt.   He was never platooned, unless your definition of platooning is giving a guy an occasional day off in the long grind of a season.

Platooning Mayo?   He has 10 starts.   6 vs RHP, 4 vs LHP.

Absolute nonsense.

Also don't forget that just because a player may not show a platoon advantage vs the other side, or even has slight "backwards splits",  often the pitcher does have an extreme platoon disadvantage, so even if the player is platoon neutral it or slightly backwards, could STILL be the correct move to get the bat in against the pitcher who gets hit hard by righties..

The Orioles clearly value the pitcher's splits over the hitter's splits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Hyde wears his emotions on his sleeve so he probably needed to get out of there because if we're frustrated, you can only imagine how he feels. 

The Holliday error was an absolute back breaker that changed the entire situation from 1st and 3rd with two outs (assuming they would walk O'Neill) and the Red Sox having two lefties coming up against Akin, to 1st and 3rd, one out, and Akin needing to face a lefty masher.

When you're that close to getting away with a win, and your 2nd baseman can't make a simple, routing play, it was frustrating. He can't be seen screaming "WTF" so he ran into the dugout and probably screamed it in there.

I also wonder if he was mad at Akin. He has made some comments about guys making mistakes when they have been directed to pitch around (rather than intentionally walk) dangerous hitters. 

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/brandon-hyde-s-take-on-why-the-o-s-issue-so-few-intentional-walks

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LGOrioles said:

Holliday has a .454 OPS since his last HR, just over a month ago. They are unquestionably better with Urias/Westburg at 3B/2B. They would be better off with literally any middle/corner IF combo on the roster that doesn’t include either Holliday or Mayo. 

FWIW, watching Mayo on Mon/Tue, he seemed to me to have made some progress on dialing in his timing. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him start putting up some better results with the bat in the next few games if he's allowed to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HowAboutThat said:

 

So, you are correct, we have no idea what goes on in there. But it would be ridiculous to think there isn’t any friction that needs to be dealt with. And dealing with it is Hyde’s job.

 

That's pure speculation. 

I know you've got an axe to grind against Hyde but until things are confirmed and out in the open that's all we can do...speculate.  And look for confirmation biases.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

I also wonder if he was mad at Akin. He has made some comments about guys making mistakes when they have been directed to pitch around (rather than intentionally walk) dangerous hitters. 

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/brandon-hyde-s-take-on-why-the-o-s-issue-so-few-intentional-walks

 

Perhaps, but if so, that's a bad policy. You risk exactly what happened if a pitcher misses during a pitch around. Pitchers are not perfect, but IBB almost always are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Orioles0615 said:

We can’t just keep using the injury excuse. The Orioles aren’t the only playoff teams beat up. Look at the Dodgers 

We can if it happens to be the truth.  The Orioles aren't the Dodgers, particularly when it comes to payroll.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Perhaps, but if so, that's a bad policy. You risk exactly what happened if a pitcher misses during a pitch around. Pitchers are not perfect, but IBB almost always are.

Ha. I said in the game thread we should walk him. However, that was a borderline case. You also don't want to put the go ahead run on 2nd. IBB reduces the chance of a dagger HR but allows a base hit to win it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does anyone think Dean's answer to the question has anything to do with a clubhouse issue? The reporter asked a sort of dumb question to a pitcher. Dean can only do what he can on the mound to the best of his ability. Like he said, that's his job, not "turning the team around". 

Honestly guys, there's nothing to see here.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Orioles0615 said:

We can’t just keep using the injury excuse. The Orioles aren’t the only playoff teams beat up. Look at the Dodgers 

You mean the team with a 238 million dollar payroll that has won a whole four games more than the Orioles? Come on. It's a lot easier to handle injuries when you've got a quarter of a billion dollars invested in payroll.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

We can if it happens to be the truth.  The Orioles aren't the Dodgers, particularly when it comes to payroll.  

And the Dodgers have won a whopping four games more than the Orioles! You can make a strong cate that the Orioles have actually handled injuries better than the Dodgers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

We can if it happens to be the truth.  The Orioles aren't the Dodgers, particularly when it comes to payroll.  

 

34 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

We can if it happens to be the truth.  The Orioles aren't the Dodgers, particularly when it comes to payroll.  

I was accused of "crying about payroll " when I stated that fact earlier. You can sweep some stuff under the rug at that dollar amount.

 

Theyreleased a player that would have been the fourth highest paid player in Baltimore...they are on a different level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, maybenxtyr said:

 

I was accused of "crying about payroll " when I stated that fact earlier. You can sweep some stuff under the rug at that dollar amount.

 

Theyreleased a player that would have been the fourth highest paid player in Baltimore...they are on a different level. 

The incessant emphasis on payroll is not productive and yes, comes off to me as whining.  Our wins mean more because the payroll is lower.  Our ability to overcome injuries is more impressive because our payroll is lower.    You can't expect us to win win other teams spend more.  Every year it's a constant refrain of one of more of these tropes.

Boohoo the game isn't fair.  It wouldn't be fair with a salary cap.  You think the Lakers and the Wizards have the same ability to lure free agents? 

Y'all act like the Orioles payroll is somehow an anomaly and not the norm for other teams that manage to stay competitive. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...