Jump to content

Snell and Fried


Orange

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Orange said:

How would you feel if we trusted the growth of the offense to the bevy of top prospects we have already introduced to the big leagues, didn't sign any hitters in FA, and Rubenstein opened the checkbook and paid for the two exemplary left handers on the free agent market in Snell and Fried? They might be attracted to the dimensions of the park and we can finally start building the roster to take advantage of the wall.

We'd get comp picks for Santa and Burnes, pick up all of the bullpen options, and we'd just play all of the kids (and we'd have room for them in Baltimore).

A rotation of Snell, Fried, Rodriguez, Eflin, and Kremer with Suarez, Povich, and McDermott on standby plus some non-zero chance of contribution from Bradish and Wells. The bullpen could use another top righty, but if Felix comes back close to 100% the pen is already a strength. The big bet would be on the young guys, and I'd argue that it already is.

Snell is only good for about 22/23 starts …. He’d be a bad sign if he gets anywhere near Burnes deal..

Edited by Roll Tide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to resign Burnes, resign Santander (if the deal and length is fair), add another star quality bat, and then we can add to the bullpen. I absolutely love the idea of adding Max Fried (and any star left handed starter) to the rotiation, but I'm not sure I see them as a bigger priority than Burnes and boosting the lineup. I think Santander boosts the lineup because he's a rare 100 RBI per season power switch hitter who is good from both sides of the plate, and as good as any of the better switch hitters who has ever played the game. I think he is highly under rated around this message board. In other parts of Birdland, he is much more appreciated.

But resigning them will not be enough, as 2024 showed. We will need to improve the roster around them too.  And we will need more ability to manufacture runs for the offense. I think having speedsters back like Mateo will contribute to that, but the problem is we need speedsters who are more reliable at getting on base than Mateo has always been. (Maybe add a true/pure lead off hitter?) And we can use another steady power bat.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Orange said:

This is our first offseason with Uncle Ruby’s money. I think it’s burning a hole in his pocket. He wants to make a splash.

It is possible that he told Elias to come to him with whatever the best plan is and he’d be inclined to fund it. I mean, he said something to Elias, right?? What do you think he said to him about the payroll?

For all we know Elias is cheap as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just depends on what is a sustainable spend amount for the O's.  I don't want us to go crazy buying only to be sunk in a deep hole in 2 years.  We should a have a 4-5 year window of playoff appearances ahead of us.

I'd rather sign Burnes if we are going to spend big.  I think he's more realistic anyway since he knows what it's like here, and I'd feel much more comfortable with his durability than Snell/Fried.  He also appears to have figured out how to be effective without big strikeout numbers which bodes well.  I still don't see us signing him.

I'm in favor of some short-term contracts for mid-tier guys who might have a big year.  Not very exciting but I think the safer play.  Again, knowing nothing about the money situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I think he is highly under rated around this message board. In other parts of Birdland, he is much more appreciated.

I would argue the exact opposite, that Santander is wildly overrated by casual Orioles fans on Twitter, Facebook, etc.

This was easily his best season of his career so far and his overall performance was still only good for a .235/.308/.506 overall batting line.

H

in other words, he hits HRs and that's it. He has no other on-field value. Locking him up at a high AAV well into his 30s probably will not end well for whoever ends up landing him this winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burnes' West Coast chances are maybe affected if Tyler Glasnow needs TJ.

Same as Elias has trash dumped stuff we didn't know on Sarasota Day 1 the last couple seasons, Friedman and the Dodgers probably know a prognosis today that won't come out until after the World Series.

It is due diligence for Scott Boras to know the Dodgers best bid before closing an auction, especially if Burnes shuns the Mets because he hates David Stearns with the fire of a thousand suns for treating him roughly in Arb.    I don't think Burnes works that great on the Dodgers either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I'd love to have him, but why would they trade him? They are trying to contend and already have a pretty high payroll, and he isn't even arb-eligible yet, so he is exactly the kind of guy they need right now. If they trade him, they have to replace him in the lineup and that would likely have to come at a much higher price in free agency.
    • The pitch is that they have improved upon a playoff team, have the best young talent in the sport and should be a playoff team in most scenarios.     In other words, it’s the pitch any team can hope for because, for the most part, individual players don’t bring you ticket sales that make a difference.  A guy like Ohtani is obviously an exception but far from a rule.
    • In that scenario what is the marketing pitch to sell or upgrade season tickets?    My first question as an owner would be-how will that that approach generate more revenue?  What is the attendance risk if we continue to play .500 ball?    Where is the hope that they will be better or more entertaining than last year?  Will that approach put fans in the seats willing to upgrade or spend more at the park? Hope brought fans to OPACY last year and frankly I don't believe the experience over the last 100 games  brings them back-sub par defense, pitching  a tedious all or nothing offense, admitted crappy stadium experience. You are losing arguably two of your best, most productive players-the NYY are again a juggernaut, your brand of baseball (last 100 games) is not entertaining.   I don't disagree that moves at the deadline foreshadow roster construction for 2025 but I believe ownership/management will spend for two reasons: -last year's end product was subpar-they over promised and under delivered-lot's of empty seats in the playoffs was very scary from a marketing perspective. -Rubenstein is going to be under pressure to add payroll by MLPA and a very influential faction of owners.  The Orioles have not yet been added to the MLBPA grievance re: teams not spending their revenue sharing funds (Oakland, TB, Pittsburgh, Miami).  This will be a HUGE issue in the next CBA and something  that new ownership given their visibility (both inside and outside MLB) would like to avoid at all costs.      
    • If I was Elias I'd be asking the Giants what it would take to get Heliot Ramos. He hit .370 / .439 / .750 vs LH pitchers this season. He just turned 25 years old, and split time between CF and LF so it would take a lot* to get him. According to Baseball Reference his most similar player by age is.....Anthony Santander.    *Mayo + Bradfield ?
    • Elias isn’t giving relievers 3+ year contracts.    If he can get Holmes for 2 years, great but he’s not going to go nuts with the reliever contracts.  The one year deals for Soto and Dominguez make them near locks.
    • Eh, who knows.  I don't really think Rogers or Povich will stop them from improving the roster, personally. Those are good depth guys. 
    • The Os are going to look for depth they can put in the minors.  They aren’t blocking what we have for the majors.  It’s just not happening. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...